Building design based on energy dissipation: A critical assessment

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1375-1396

  Mitropoulou, Chara Ch ^a   Lagaros, Nikos D ^a   Papadrakakis, Manolis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Behaviour factor; Life cyclecost analysis; Performance based design; RC buildings; Structural optimization

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOUR FACTOR; BUILDING DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION COSTS; CRITICAL ASSESSMENT; CROSS SECTION; DESIGN VARIABLES; ECONOMICAL DESIGN; EUROCODES; LIFE-CYCLECOST ANALYSIS; LIFE-TIMES; MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION; MULTISTOREY BUILDINGS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; RC BUILDINGS; SEISMIC DESIGN CODE; STEEL REINFORCEMENTS; TOTAL LIFE;

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; DESIGN; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FUNCTIONS; LIFE CYCLE; OCEAN STRUCTURES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN;

EUROPE;

EID: 78650075589     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9182-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ATC-13: (1985) Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
2. ATC-19: (1995) Structural response modification factors. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
3. ATC-34: (1995) A critical review of current approaches to earthquake resistance design. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
4. Borzi B, Elnashai AS (2000) Refined force reduction factors for seismic design. Eng Struct 22(10): 1244-1260.
5. Chan C-M, Zou X-K (2004) Elastic and inelastic drift performance optimization for reinforced concrete buildings under earthquake loads. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33(8): 929-950.
6. Cuesta I, Aschheim MA, Fajfar P (2003) Simplified R-factor relationships for strong ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 19(1): 25-45.
7. EN 1998-1: 2003 (2003) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Commission of the European Communities, European Committee for Standardization, October.
8. Elenas A, Meskouris K (2001) Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures. Eng Struct 23: 698-704.
9. Ellingwood BR, Wen Y-K (2005) Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low-probability/high consequence earthquake events in mid-America. Prog Struct Eng Mater 7(2): 56-70.
10. Fajfar P (1998) Towards nonlinear methods for the future seismic codes. In: Booth (Ed.) Seismic design practice into the next century. Balkema.
11. FEMA 227 (1992) A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington.
12. Frangopol DM (1986) Computer-automated design of structural systems under reliability-based performance constraints. Eng Comput 3(2): 109-115.
13. Gasparini DA, Vanmarcke EH (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. MIT civil engineering research report R76-4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
14. Ghobarah A, Abou-Elfath H, Biddah A (1999) Response-based damage assessment of structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28(1): 79-104.
15. Ghobarah A (2004) On drift limits associated with different damage levels. International Workshop on Performance- Based Seismic Design, June 28-July 1.
16. Kappos AJ (1999) Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies. Eng Struct 21(9): 823-835.
17. Kang Y-J, Wen YK (2000) Minimum life-cycle cost structural design against natural hazards, Structural Research Series No. 629. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
18. Karavasilis TL, Bazeos N, Beskos DE (2007) Behaviour factor for performance-based seismic design of plane steel moment resisting frames. J Earthquake Eng 11(4): 531-559.
19. Karakostas CZ, Athanassiadou CJ, Kappos AJ, Lekidis VA (2007) Site-dependent design spectra and strength modification factors, based on records from Greece. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 27(11): 1012-1027.
20. Lagaros ND (2007) Life-cycle cost analysis of construction practices. Bull Earthquake Eng 5: 425-442.
21. Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2007) Seismic design of RC structures: a critical assessment in the framework of multi-objective optimization. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 36(12): 1623-1639.
22. Lagaros ND, Garavelas ATh, Papadrakakis M (2008) Innovative seismic design optimization with reliability constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1): 28-41.
23. Lam N, Wilsont J, Hutchinson G (1998) The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 27: 749-769.
24. Lee K, Foutch DA (2006) Seismic evaluation of steel moment frame buildings designed using different R-values. J Struct Eng 132(9): 1461-1472.
25. Li G, Cheng G (2001) Optimal decision for the target value of performance-based structural system reliability. Struct Multidiscip Optim 22(4): 261-267.
26. Lu Y, Hao H, Carydis PG, Mouzakis H (2001) Seismic performance of RC frames designed for three different ductility levels. Eng Struct 23(5): 537-547.
27. Mazzolani FM, Piluso V (1996) The theory and design of seismic resistant steel frames. E & FN Spon.
28. Miranda E, Bertero VV (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design. Earthquake Spectra 10(2): 357-379.
29. Moharrami H, Grierson DE (1993) Computer-automated design of reinforced concrete frameworks. J Struct Eng 119(7): 2036-2058.
30. Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O (2003) On latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 25(1): 47-68.
31. Palazzo B, Petti L (1996) Reduction factors for base isolated structures. Comput Struct 60(6): 945-956.
32. Papaioannou I, Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (2005) Inelastic analysis of framed structures using the fiber approach, Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Computational Mechanics (GRACM 05), Limassol, Cyprus, June 29-July 1.
33. Papazachos BC, Papaioannou ChA, Theodulidis NP (1993) Regionalization of seismic hazard in Greece based on seismic sources. Natural Hazards 8(1): 1-18.
34. PrEN 1992-1-1: 2002 (2002) Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures- Part 1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Commission of the European Communities, European Committee for Standardization, December.
35. Rackwitz R (2006) The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(4): 469-484.
36. Rackwitz R, Lentz A, Faber M (2005) Socio-economically sustainable civil engineering infrastructures by optimization. Struct Saf 27(3): 187-229.
37. Sarma KC, Adeli H (1998) Cost optimization of concrete structures. J Struct Eng 124(5): 570-578.
38. Wen YK, Kang YJ (2001) Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology. J Struct Eng 127(3): 330-337.
39. Wen YK, Kang YJ (2001) Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: Applications. J Struct Eng 127(3): 338-346.
40. Whittaker A, Hart G, Rojahn C (1999) Seismic response modification factors. J Struct Eng 125(4): 438-444.