Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 951-979

  Giovenale, Paolo ^a   Cornell, C Allin ^b   Esteva, Luis ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Ground motion intensity measures; Non linear dynamic analysis; Performance based earthquake engineering

Indexed keywords

DISPERSION (WAVES); EARTHQUAKES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

DEMAND ESTIMATES; GROUND MOTION;

SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GROUND MOTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 3042587107     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.386     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H. Progress and Challenges in Seismic Performance Assessment, 2000 [http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/performance/html].
2. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measure for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2001 (submitted).
3. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
4. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Non-linear Structures. Report No. RMS-35; RMS Program Stanford University, Stanford, 1999 [http://pitch.stanford.edu/rmsweb/Thesis/Nilesh Shome.pdf].
5. Cornell CA. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1968; 58: 1583-1606.
6. Abramhamson NA, Silva WJ. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68:94-127.
7. Cordova PP, Deierlein GG, Mehanny SS, Cornell CA. Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Japan, 11-13 September 2000.
8. Inoue T. Seismic Hazard Analysis of Multi-degree-of-freedom Structures. Report No. RMS-8; RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, 1990.
9. Hutchinson TC, Chai YH, Boulanger RW, Idriss IM. Inelastic seismic response of extended pile shaft supported bridge structures. Earthquake Spectra 2001 (submitted).
10. Conte JP, Pandit H, Stewart JP, Wallace J. Ground Motion Intensity Measure for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, San Francisco, California, 6-9 July 2003.
11. Hamburger RO. A Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Resistive Design. EERC-Curee Symposium in Honor of Vitelmo V. Bertero. Berkeley, California, 1997.
12. SEAOC. Vision 2000-A Framework for Performance Based Earthquake Engineering. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, 1995.
13. USGS. USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps. United States Geological Survey, 2002 [http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq//].
14. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger MO, Foutch DA. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128:526-533.
15. Jalayer F. Direct Probabilistic Seismic Analysis: Implementing Non-linear Dynamic Assessment: Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford, CA, 2003 [http://pitch.stanford.edu/rmsweb/Thesis/FatemehJalayer.pdf].
16. Krawinkler H, Medina R, Alavi B. Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions. Engineering Structures: The Journal of Earthquake, Wind and Ocean Engineering 2002 (submitted).
17. Benjamin JR, Cornell CA. Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1970.
18. Bazzurro P. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis; Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1998 [http://pitch.stanford.edu/rmsweb/Thesis/PaoloBazzurro.pdf].
19. Wolfram S. The Mathematica Book Fourth Edition-Mathematica Version 4; Cambridge University Press: Wolfram Media, 2000.
20. Ang AHS, Tang WH. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design. Volume I-Basic Principles. Wiley: New York, 1975.
21. McKenna F, Fenves GL. The OpenSees Command Language Manual-Version 1.2. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.