Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 951-972

  Jalayer, Fati ^a,b   Cornell, C A ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Demand and capacity factored design; Earthquake engineering; Global instability; Multiple stripe analysis; Non linear dynamic analysis; Performance based design; Probabilistic seismic assessments

Indexed keywords

BUILDING MATERIALS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DAMAGE DETECTION; DESIGN; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; VIBRATION CONTROL;

DEMAND AND CAPACITY FACTORED DESIGN; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GLOBAL INSTABILITY; MULTIPLE-STRIPE ANALYSIS; NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN; PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC ASSESSMENTS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE 1994; NUMERICAL METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; SEISMICITY;

EID: 68149100764     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.876     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wen YK. Reliability and performance-based design. Structural Safety 2001; 23:407-428.
2. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):526-533.
3. Jalayer F, Cornell CA. A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report, 2003; 2003/08.
4. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 31(3):491-514.
5. Cordova PP, Deierlein GG, Mehanny SSF, Cornell CA. Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. The Second US-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Japan, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center (PEER), 2000; 2000/10; 195-214.
6. Medina R, Krawinkler H. Seismic Demands for non-deteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center (PEER), 2003; 2003/15.
7. Jalayer F, Franchin P, Pinto PE. A scalar damage measure for seismic reliability analysis of RC frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):2059-2079.
8. Baker JW. Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36(13):1861-1883.
9. Tothong P, Cornell CA. Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37: 1013-1037.
10. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14(3):469-500.
11. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(2):357-392.
12. Baker JW, Cornell CA. Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(9):1077-1095.
13. Pincheira JA, Dotiwala FS, D'Souza JT. Seismic analysis of older reinforced concrete columns. Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(2):245-272.
14. Dotiwala FS, D'Souza JT, Pincheira JA. Drain2D-UW User's Manual. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1998.
15. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: PEER Strong Motion Database. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/ [16 September 2008].
16. McGuire RK. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bulletin of Seismic Society of America 1995; 85(5):1275-1284.
17. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. On disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 1999; 89(2):501-520.
18. Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 2665. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering: Upper Hutt, New Zealand, 2000.
19. Iervolino I, Cornell CA. Record selection for non-linear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(3):685-713.
20. Luco N, Bazzurro P. Effects of ground motion scaling on non-linear structural response. PEER Life Line Report, 1G00, 31 December 2003.
21. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. RMS Program, Report No. RMS35 (Ph.D. Thesis), Stanford University, May 1999.
22. Kennedy RP, Short SA. Basis for seismic provisions of DOE-STD-1020. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Brookhaven National Laboratory, Report Numbers UCRL-CR-111478 and BNL-52418, 1994.
23. Luco N, Cornell CA. Seismic drift demands for two SMRF structures with brittle connections. Structural Engineering World Wide. Elsevier Science Ltd.: Oxford, England, 1998. Paper T158-3.
24. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC: London, Boca Raton, FL, 1993.
25. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM. Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, Tokyo, vol. II, 1960; 895-912.
26. Yun SY, Hamburger RO, Cornell CA, Foutch DA. Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):534-545.