Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1381-1401

  Lagaros, Nikos D ^a,b   Fotis, Andreas D ^b   Krikos, Stilianos A ^b  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Limit state dependent cost; Performance based design; Prescriptive design procedures; Pushover analysis

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; SAFETY FACTOR;

LIMIT STATE-DEPENDENT COST; PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN; PRESCRIPTIVE DESIGN PROCEDURES; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN CODES;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING CODE; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; ELASTICITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; GREECE; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 33748663279     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.585     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Seismic performance of RC frames designed to Eurocode 8 or the Greek Codes 2000. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2004; 2:221-259.
2. Browning J. Proportioning earthquake-resistant RC frames in central/ eastern U.S. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(6):1267-1280.
3. Qiang X. Need of performance-based earthquake engineering in Taiwan: a lesson from the Chichi earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(11):1609-1627.
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Methodology for evaluation and upgrade of reinforced concrete buildings. Report No. ATC-40, California Seismic Safety Commission, Sacramento, CA, 1996.
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC). NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
6. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). Vision 2000 a Framework for Performance-Based Seismic Engineering. Structural Engineers Association of California: Sacramento, CA, 1995.
7. Fajfar P. Towards nonlinear methods for the future seismic codes. In Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Booth ED (ed.). Balkema: Rotterdam, 1998.
8. Mazzolani FM, Piluso V. The Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames. E & FN Spon: London, 1996.
9. American Society of Civil Engineers. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
10. European Committee for Standardization. Draft for development of Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures. ENV 1992-1-1, 1992.
11. EKOS 2000. National code for concrete building structures of Hellas, 2000.
12. EAK 2000. National seismic code of Hellas, 2000.
13. Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM, Priestley MJN, Kowalsky MJ. The limitations and performances of different displacement based design methods. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(1):201-241.
14. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. A displacement-based seismic design procedure for RC buildings and comparison with EC8. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1439-1462.
15. FEMA 350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
16. Somerville P, Collins N. Ground motion time histories for the Humboldt bay bridge. Pasadena, CA, URS Corporation, 2002, www.peertestbeds.net/ humboldt.htm
17. Papazachos BC, Papaioannou ChA, Theodulidis NP. Regionalization of seismic hazard in Greece based on seismic sources. Natural Hazards 1993; 8(1):1-18.
18. Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(3):417-442.
19. Wen YK, Kang YJ. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering 2001; 127(3):330-337.
20. ATC- 13. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, CA, 1985.
21. FEMA 227. A Benefit-Cost Model for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council: Washington, DC, 1992.
22. Ghobarah A. On drift limits associated with different damage levels. International Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design, June 28-July 1, 2004.
23. Wen YK, Kang YJ. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering 2001; 127(3):338-346.
24. Avramidis IE, Anastasiadis K, Athantopoulou A, Katsavelos A. The myth of the excessive cost of seismic resistant structures designed for elastic behaviour for the design earthquake. 14th National Congress on RC structures, Kos, Greece, 2003.