Cdk5rap2 exposes the centrosomal root of microcephaly syndromes

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 470-480

  Megraw, Timothy L ^a   Sharkey, James T ^a   Nowakowski, Richard S ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CDK5RAP2 PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; MESSENGER RNA; MICROCEPHALIN; MYOMEGALIN; PERICENTRIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CENTRIOLE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; DNA DAMAGE; EUKARYOTIC FLAGELLUM; HUMAN; MICROCEPHALY; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE; SECKEL SYNDROME; SPINDLE CELL;

ANIMALS; CENTROSOME; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICE; MICROCEPHALY; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS;

MUS;

EID: 79960921403     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.007     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Rakic P. Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:724-735.
2. Gotz M., Huttner W.B. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:777-788.
3. Buchman J.J., Tsai L.H. Spindle regulation in neural precursors of flies and mammals. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:89-100.
4. Noctor S.C., et al. Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008, 508:28-44.
5. Caviness V.S., et al. Histogenetic processes leading to the laminated neocortex: migration is only a part of the story. Dev. Neurosci. 2008, 30:82-95.
6. Zhong W., Chia W. Neurogenesis and asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:4-11.
7. Kaindl A.M., et al. Many roads lead to primary autosomal recessive microcephaly. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 90:363-383.
8. Thornton G.K., Woods C.G. Primary microcephaly: do all roads lead to Rome?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:501-510.
9. Bilguvar K., et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies recessive WDR62 mutations in severe brain malformations. Nature 2010, 467:207-210.
10. Bond J., et al. A centrosomal mechanism involving CDK5RAP2 and CENPJ controls brain size. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:353-355.
11. Bond J., Woods C.G. Cytoskeletal genes regulating brain size. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18:95-101.
12. Darvish H., et al. A clinical and molecular genetic study of 112 Iranian families with primary microcephaly. J. Med. Genet. 2010, 47:823-828.
13. Guernsey D.L., et al. Mutations in centrosomal protein CEP152 in primary microcephaly families linked to MCPH4. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 87:40-51.
14. Kumar A., et al. Mutations in STIL, encoding a pericentriolar and centrosomal protein, cause primary microcephaly. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84:286-290.
15. Nicholas A.K., et al. WDR62 is associated with the spindle pole and is mutated in human microcephaly. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:1010-1014.
16. Yu T.W., et al. Mutations in WDR62, encoding a centrosome-associated protein, cause microcephaly with simplified gyri and abnormal cortical architecture. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:1015-1020.
17. Berbari N.F., et al. The primary cilium as a complex signaling center. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R526-535.
18. Goetz S.C., Anderson K.V. The primary cilium: a signalling centre during vertebrate development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:331-344.
19. Nigg E.A., Raff J.W. Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease. Cell 2009, 139:663-678.
20. Barrera J.A., et al. CDK5RAP2 regulates centriole engagement and cohesion in mice. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:913-926.
21. Buchman J.J., et al. Cdk5rap2 interacts with pericentrin to maintain the neural progenitor pool in the developing neocortex. Neuron 2010, 66:386-402.
22. Lizarraga S.B., et al. Cdk5rap2 regulates centrosome function and chromosome segregation in neuronal progenitors. Development 2010, 137:1907-1917.
23. Barr A.R., et al. CDK5RAP2 functions in centrosome to spindle pole attachment and DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 189:23-39.
24. Bettencourt-Dias M., Glover D.M. Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:451-463.
25. Shimada M., Komatsu K. Emerging connection between centrosome and DNA repair machinery. J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo) 2009, 50:295-301.
26. Pulvers J.N., et al. Mutations in mouse Aspm (abnormal spindle-like microcephaly associated) cause not only microcephaly but also major defects in the germline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:16595-16600.
27. Trimborn M., et al. Establishment of a mouse model with misregulated chromosome condensation due to defective Mcph1 function. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9242.
28. Liang Y., et al. BRIT1/MCPH1 is essential for mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair and maintaining genomic stability in mice. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000826.
29. Barker J.E., et al. High incidence, early onset of histiocytic sarcomas in mice with Hertwig's anemia. Exp. Hematol. 2005, 33:1118-1129.
30. Zhang J., Megraw T.L. Proper recruitment of gamma-tubulin and D-TACC/Msps to embryonic Drosophila centrosomes requires Centrosomin Motif 1. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:4037-4049.
31. Loncarek J., Khodjakov A. Ab ovo or de novo? Mechanisms of centriole duplication. Mol. Cells 2009, 27:135-142.
32. Fish J.L., et al. Aspm specifically maintains symmetric proliferative divisions of neuroepithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10438-10443.
33. Alderton G.K., et al. Regulation of mitotic entry by microcephalin and its overlap with ATR signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:725-733.
34. Brown J.A., et al. MCPH1/BRIT1 limits ionizing radiation-induced centrosome amplification. Oncogene 2010, 29:5537-5544.
35. Kalay E., et al. CEP152 is a genome maintenance protein disrupted in Seckel syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:23-26.
36. Basto R., et al. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 2008, 133:1032-1042.
37. Ganem N.J., et al. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 2009, 460:278-282.
38. Acilan C., Saunders W.S. A tale of too many centrosomes. Cell 2008, 134:572-575.
39. Tibelius A., et al. Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:1149-1157.
40. Tarui T., et al. Overexpression of p27 Kip 1, probability of cell cycle exit, and laminar destination of neocortical neurons. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1343-1355.
41. Lesage B., et al. Neural stem cells: the need for a proper orientation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2010, 20:438-442.
42. Siller K.H., Doe C.Q. Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:365-374.
43. Rebollo E., et al. Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 2007, 12:467-474.
44. Rusan N.M., Peifer M. A role for a novel centrosome cycle in asymmetric cell division. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 177:13-20.
45. Feng Y., Walsh C.A. Mitotic spindle regulation by Nde1 controls cerebral cortical size. Neuron 2004, 44:279-293.
46. Konno D., et al. Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:93-101.
47. Morin X., et al. Control of planar divisions by the G-protein regulator LGN maintains progenitors in the chick neuroepithelium. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:1440-1448.
48. Imai F., et al. Inactivation of aPKClambda results in the loss of adherens junctions in neuroepithelial cells without affecting neurogenesis in mouse neocortex. Development 2006, 133:1735-1744.
49. Yamashita Y.M., Fuller M.T. Asymmetric centrosome behavior and the mechanisms of stem cell division. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:261-266.
50. Conduit P.T., Raff J.W. Cnn dynamics drive centrosome size asymmetry to ensure daughter centriole retention in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2187-2192.
51. Januschke J., Gonzalez C. The interphase microtubule aster is a determinant of asymmetric division orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:693-706.
52. Wang X., et al. Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex. Nature 2009, 461:947-955.
53. Han Y.G., Alvarez-Buylla A. Role of primary cilia in brain development and cancer. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2010, 20:58-67.
54. Delaval B., Doxsey S.J. Pericentrin in cellular function and disease. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:181-190.
55. Graser S., et al. Cep164, a novel centriole appendage protein required for primary cilium formation. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:321-330.
56. Cizmecioglu O., et al. Cep152 acts as a scaffold for recruitment of Plk4 and CPAP to the centrosome. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:731-739.
57. Dzhindzhev N.S., et al. Asterless is a scaffold for the onset of centriole assembly. Nature 2010, 467:714-718.
58. Conduit P.T., et al. Centrioles regulate centrosome size by controlling the rate of Cnn incorporation into the PCM. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2178-2186.
59. Wang Z., et al. Conserved motif of CDK5RAP2 mediates its localization to centrosomes and the Golgi complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:22658-22665.
60. Griffith E., et al. Mutations in pericentrin cause Seckel syndrome with defective ATR-dependent DNA damage signaling. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:232-236.
61. Rauch A., et al. Mutations in the pericentrin (PCNT) gene cause primordial dwarfism. Science 2008, 319:816-819.
62. Willems M., et al. Molecular analysis of pericentrin gene (PCNT) in a series of 24 Seckel/MOPD II families. J. Med. Genet. 2009, 47:797-802.
63. Piane M., et al. Majewski osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II (MOPD II) syndrome previously diagnosed as Seckel syndrome: report of a novel mutation of the PCNT gene. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2009, 149A:2452-2456.
64. Al-Dosari M.S., et al. Novel CENPJ mutation causes Seckel syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 2010, 47:411-414.
65. Loffler H., et al. Structure meets function - centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312:2633-2640.
66. Bourke E., et al. DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8:603-609.
67. Alderton G.K., et al. Seckel syndrome exhibits cellular features demonstrating defects in the ATR-signalling pathway. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13:3127-3138.
68. Jeffers L.J., et al. Distinct BRCT domains in Mcph1/Brit1 mediate ionizing radiation-induced focus formation and centrosomal localization. Oncogene 2008, 27:139-144.
69. Fujimori A., et al. Ionizing radiation downregulates ASPM, a gene responsible for microcephaly in humans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 369:953-957.
70. Inanc B., et al. A centrosome-autonomous signal that involves centriole disengagement permits centrosome duplication in G2 phase after DNA damage. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:3866-3877.
71. Ruzankina Y., et al. Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:113-126.
72. Januschke J., et al. Drosophila neuroblasts retain the daughter centrosome. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:243.
73. Basto R., et al. Flies without centrioles. Cell 2006, 125:1375-1386.
74. Graser S., et al. Cep68 and Cep215 (Cdk5rap2) are required for centrosome cohesion. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120:4321-4331.
75. Fong K.W., et al. CDK5RAP2 is a pericentriolar protein that functions in centrosomal attachment of the gamma-tubulin ring complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:115-125.
76. Zhang X., et al. CDK5RAP2 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1206-1216.
77. Haren L., et al. Plk1-dependent recruitment of gamma-tubulin complexes to mitotic centrosomes involves multiple PCM components. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5976.
78. Fong K.W., et al. Interaction of CDK5RAP2 with EB1 to track growing microtubule tips and to regulate microtubule dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:3660-3670.
79. Lee S., Rhee K. CEP215 is involved in the dynein-dependent accumulation of pericentriolar matrix proteins for spindle pole formation. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:774-783.
80. Tsou M.F., et al. Polo kinase and separase regulate the mitotic licensing of centriole duplication in human cells. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:344-354.
81. Blachon S., et al. Drosophila asterless and vertebrate Cep152 are orthologs essential for centriole duplication. Genetics 2008, 180:2081-2094.
82. Hatch E.M., et al. Cep152 interacts with Plk4 and is required for centriole duplication. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:721-729.
83. Megraw T.L., et al. Zygotic development without functional mitotic centrosomes. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:116-120.
84. Samejima I., et al. Fission yeast Mto1 regulates diversity of cytoplasmic microtubule organizing centers. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1959-1965.
85. Lucas E.P., Raff J.W. Maintaining the proper connection between the centrioles and the pericentriolar matrix requires Drosophila centrosomin. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:725-732.
86. Samejima I., et al. Two distinct regions of Mto1 are required for normal microtubule nucleation and efficient association with the gamma-tubulin complex in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:3971-3980.
87. Choi Y.K., et al. CDK5RAP2 stimulates microtubule nucleation by the gamma-tubulin ring complex. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:1089-1095.
88. Gonzalez C. Spindle orientation, asymmetric division and tumour suppression in Drosophila stem cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:462-472.
89. Farkas L.M., Huttner W.B. The cell biology of neural stem and progenitor cells and its significance for their proliferation versus differentiation during mammalian brain development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:707-715.
90. Yamashita Y.M., et al. Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science 2007, 315:518-521.