An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 43, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Rubinstein, Jay T ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Compound action potential; Computational model; Electrophysiology

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CALCULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 13144295002     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abbas, P.J., Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Miller, C.A. & South, H. 2004. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neuro-Otol, 9(4), 203-213.
2. Boex, G., de Balthasar, C., Kos, M.I. & Pelizzone, M. 2003. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am, 114(4 Pt 1), 2049-2057.
3. Briaire, J.J. & Frijns, J.H. 2000. Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res, 148(1-2), 18-30.
4. Brown, C.J. & Abbas, P.J. 1990. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(5), 2205-2210.
5. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J. & Gantz, B. 1990. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 88(3), 1385-1391.
6. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear, 21(2), 151-163.
7. Chi, S.L. 2001. Correlating Loudness and EAP Measures. PhD thesis. University of Iowa.
8. Cohen, L.T., Richardson, L.M., Saunders, E. & Cowan, R.S. 2003. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res, 179(1-2), 72-87.
9. Cohen, L.T., Saunders, E. & Richardson, L.M. 2004. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol, 43, 1-10.
10. Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., Weber, B.J., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., et al. 2004. NRT recordings with the Nucleus research platform 8 system. Proceedings of the 7th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Geneva.
11. Finley, C.C., Wilson, B.S. & White, M.W. 1990. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: J.M. Miller & F.A. Spelman (eds.) Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 55-96.
12. Frijns, J.H.M. 1995. Cochlear Implants: A Modeling Approach. PhD thesis. Leiden University.
13. Gantz, B.J., Brown, C.J. & Abbas, P.J. 1994. Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol, 15(2), 137-144.
14. Girzon, G. 1987. Investigation of Current Flow in the Inner Ear During Electrical Stimulation of Intracochlear Electrodes. MS thesis. MIT.
15. Goldstein, M.H. & Kiang, N.Y.-S. 1958. Synchrony of neural activity in electric response evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 30, 107-114.
16. Hall, R.D. 1990. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res, 49(1-3), 155-168.
17. Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A.A. & Gervais, J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear, 21(2), 164-174.
18. Matsuoka, A.J., Rubinstein, J.T., Abbas, P.J. & Miller, C.A. 2001. The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation models and measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 48(4), 416-424.
19. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J. & Brown, C.J. 2000. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear, 21(4), 280-290.
20. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J., Nourski, K.V., Hu, N. & Robinson, B.K. 2003. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear Res, 175(1-2), 200-214.
21. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J. & Robinson, B.K. 2001. Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2(3), 216-232.
22. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J. & Rubinstein, J.T. 1999a. An empirically based model of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res, 135(1-2), 1-18.
23. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J., Robinson, B.K., Rubinstein, J.T. & Matsuoka, A.J. 1999b. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res, 130(1-2), 197-218.
24. Mino, H., Rubinstein, J.T., Miller, C.A. & Abbas, P.J. 2004. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal jitter with electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 51(1), 13-20.
25. Mino, H., Rubinstein, J.T. & White, J.A. 2002. Comparison of algorithms for the simulation of action potentials with stochastic sodium channels. Ann Biomed Eng, 30(4), 578-587.
26. Nadol, J.B. Jr. 1990. Degeneration of cochlear neurons in the spiral ganglion of man. Hear Res, 49, 141-154.
27. Nadol, J.B., Young, Y.-S. & Glynn, R.J. 1989. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implication for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 98, 411-416.
28. Rubinstein, J.T. 1993. Axon termination conditions for electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 40(7), 654-663.
29. Rubinstein, J.T. 1995. Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium channel model of the node of Ranvier. Biophys J, 68, 779-785.
30. Rubinstein, J.T., Miller, C.A., Mino, H. & Abbas, P.J. 2001. Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 48(10), 1065-1070.
31. Rubinstein, J.T., Wilson, B.S., Finley, C.C. & Abbas, P.J. 1999. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence with electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Hear Res, 127, 108-118.
32. Vanpoucke, F.J., Zarowski, A. & Peeters, S. 2004. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng., in press.
33. Wang, B. 1979. The Relation Between the Compound Action Potential and Unit Discharges of the Auditory Nerve. PhD, thesis. MIT.
34. Wang, B. & Kiang, N.Y.S. 1978. Synthesized compound action potentials (CAPs) of the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am, 63(suppl), S77.
35. Yoo, S.K., Wang, G., Collison, F., Rubinstein, J.T., Vannier, M.W., et al. 2004. Three-dimensional localization of cochlear implant electrodes using epipolar stereophotogrammetry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 51(5), 838-846.