Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions

Hearing Research

Volumn 211, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 33-45

  Stickney, Ginger S ^a,e   Loizou, Philipos C ^b   Mishra, Lakshmi N ^b,d   Assmann, Peter F ^a   Shannon, Robert V ^c   Opie, Jane M ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

^c HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f NONE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Channel interaction; Cochlear implants; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VOWEL; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 30944438227     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Battmer, R.D., Goldring, J.E., Kuzma, J., Lenarz, T., 2000a. New CLARION Hi-Focus intracochlear electrode: long-term clinical results. Presented at the 6th International Cochlear Implant Conference, Miami Beach, FL.
2. Battmer, R.D., Goldring, J.E., Kuzma, J., Lenarz, T., 2000b. Intraoperative measures and postoperative clinical results with new modiolus hugging electrodes and simultaneous analog stimulation (SAS) in young children. Presented at the 6th International Cochlear Implant Conference, Miami Beach, FL.
3. C. Boëx, C. de Balthasar, K. Maria-Izabel, and M. Pelizzone Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114 4 2003 2049 2057
4. C. Boëx, M. Pelizzone, and P. Montandon Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant Am. J. Otol. 17 1996 61 68
5. R. Carhart, and J.F. Jerger Preferred method for clinical determination of puretone thresholds J. Speech Hear. Disord. 24 4 1959 330 345
6. M. Chatterjee Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 1999 850 860
7. L. Cohen, L. Richardson, E. Saunders, and R. Cowan Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking Hear. Res. 179 2003 72 87
8. C. De Balthasar, C. Boex, G. Cosendai, G. Valentini, A. Sigrist, and M. Pelizzone Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects Hear. Res. 182 1-2 2003 77 87
9. O. Dunn Multiple comparisons among means J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56 1961 52 64
10. Eddington, D.K., Whearty, M., 2001. Electrode interaction and speech reception using lateral-wall and medial-wall electrode systems. Presented at the 2001 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Pacific Grove, CA.
11. Eddington, D.K., Noel, V.A., Rabinowitz, W.M., Svirsky, M.A., Tierney, J., Zissman, M.A., 1994. Eighth quarterly progress report. In: Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses, NIH N01-DC-2-2402.
12. D.K. Eddington, W.H. Dobelle, D.E. Brackmann, M.G. Mladejovsky, and J.L. Parkin Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87 Suppl. 53 1978 5 38
13. L.M. Friesen, R.V. Shannon, D. Baskent, and X. Wang Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 2 2001 1150 1163
14. J.H.M. Frijns, S.L. de Snoo, and R. Schoonhoven Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea Hear. Res. 87 1995 170 186
15. J.H.M. Frijns, S.L. de Snoo, and J.H. ten Kate Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea Hear. Res. 95 1996 33 48
16. J.M. Frijns, J.J. Briaire, and J.J. Grote The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants Otol. Neurotol. 22 2001 340 349
17. R. Hartmann, G. Topp, and R. Klinke Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea Hear. Res. 13 1984 47 62
18. J.J. Hanekom, and R.V. Shannon Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 4 1998 2372 2384
19. J. Hillenbrand, L.A Getty, M.J. Clark, and K. Wheeler Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1995 3099 3111
20. D.T. Kaplan Resampling Stats in Matlab 1999 Resampling Stats, Inc. Arlington, VA
21. A. Kral, R. Hartmann, D. Mortazavi, and R. Klinke Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents Hear. Res. 121 1998 11 28
22. H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 1971 467 477
23. D.H. Liang, H.S. Lusted, and R.L. White The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: Current spread IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 1999 35 43
24. F.H. Lithicum Jr., J. Fayd, S.R. Otto, F.R. Galey, and W.F. House Cochlear implant histopathology Am. J. Otol. 12 1991 245 311
25. P.C. Loizou, G. Stickney, L. Mishra, and P.F. Assmann Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion speech processor Ear Hear. 24 1 2003 12 19
26. C.A. Miller, P.J. Abbas, K.V. Nourski, N. Hu, and B.K. Robinson Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties Hear. Res. 175 2003 200 214
27. M. Nilsson, S. Soli, and J. Sullivan Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 1994 1085 1099
28. ® cochlear implant Ann. Otol. Rinol. Laryngol. 108 1999 74 79
29. B.E. Pfingst, A.L. Miller, D.J. Morris, T.A. Zwolan, F.A. Spelman, and B.M. Clopton Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 166 1995 127 131
30. B.E. Pfingst, T.A. Zwolan, and L.A. Holloway Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants Hear. Res. 112 1997 247 260
31. S.J. Rebscher, R.L. Snyder, and P.A. Leake The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 5 Pt. 1 2001 2035 2048
32. A.F. Ryan, J.M. Miller, Z.X. Wang, and N.K. Woolf Spatial distribution of neural activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea Hear. Res. 50 1990 57 70
33. R.A. Schindler, D.A. Kessler, and M. Barker Clarion patient performance: an update on the clinical trials Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104 suppl. 166 1995 269 272
34. R.V. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man: II. Channel interaction Hear. Res. 12 1983 1 16
35. R.V. Shannon Loudness summation as a measure of channel interaction in a cochlear prosthesis R.A. Schindler M.M. Merzenich Cochlear implants 1985 Raven Press New York 323 333
36. R.V. Shannon, A. Jensvold, M. Padilla, M. Robert, and X. Wang Consonant recordings for speech testing J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (ARLO) 106 1999 L71 L74
37. R.K. Shepherd, S. Hatsushika, and G.M. Clark Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation Hear. Res. 66 1993 108 120
38. G.A. Studebaker A 'rationalized' arcsine transform JSHR 28 1985 455 462
39. C. van den Honert, and P.H. Stypulkowski Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings Hear. Res. 14 1984 225 243
40. C. van den Honert, and P.H. Stypulkowski Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve Hear. Res. 29 1987 195 206
41. M.W. White, M.M. Merzenich, and J.N. Gardi Multichannel cochlear implants: Channel interactions and processor design Arch. Otolaryngol. 110 1984 493 501
42. B.S. Wilson, C.C. Finley, D.T. Lawson, R.D. Wolford, D.K. Eddington, and W.M. Rabinowitz Better speech recognition with cochlear implants Nature 352 1991 236 238
43. Wygonski, J.J., Faltys, M., Shannon, R.V., Tateyama, T., Alabashayan, J., 2001. Research interface for Clarion CII cochlear implant system. Presented at the 2001 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prosthesis, Pacific Grove, CA.
44. T. Zwolan, P.R. Kileny, S. Smith, D. Mills, D. Koch, and M.J. Osberger Adult cochlear implant patient performance with evolving electrode technology Otol. Neurotol. 22 6 2001 844 849