A new method for dealing with the stimulus artefact in electrically evoked compound action potential measurements

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 137-143

  Klop, W Martin C ^a   Hartlooper, Aran ^a   Briare, Jeroen J ^a   Frijns, Johan H M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternating polarity; Artefact rejection; Cochlear implant; Compensation; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Forward masking; Neural response imaging; Stimulus artefact

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; AMPLIFIER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICALLY EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; GUINEA PIG; LATENT PERIOD; MASKING; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEURAL RESPONSE IMAGING; NEURAL RESPONSE TELEMETRY; NOMENCLATURE; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TELEMETRY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AMPLIFIERS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; GUINEA PIGS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 1642350274     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480310016901     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Prijs VF, Eggermont JJ. Narrow-band analysis of compound action potentials for several stimulus conditions in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1981; 4: 23-41.
2. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz BJ. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 320-7.
3. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 184-97.
4. Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, Van Dijk JE. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurotol 2002; 7: 335-47.
5. Charlet de Sauvage R, Hadj-Saïd H. Analog cancellation of an electrical stimulus artefact using a numeric model, application to the auditory system. Innov Tech Biol Med 1988; 9: 357-69.
6. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 2205-10.
7. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Robinson BK, Matsuoka AJ, Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res 1998; 119: 142-54.
8. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45-59.
9. Frijns JH, van Wijngaarden A, Peeters S. A multichannel simultaneous data acquisition and waveform generator system designed for medical applications. J Med Eng Technol 1994; 18: 54-60.
10. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, Schoonhoven R. Integrated use of volume conduction and neural models to simulate the response to cochlear implants. Simul Pract Theory 2000; 8: 75-97.
11. Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, ten Kate JH. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 1996; 95: 33-48.
12. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 280-90.
13. Peeters S, Van Immerseel L, Zarowski A, Houben V, Govaerts P, Offeciers E. New developments in cochlear implants. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998; 52: 115-27.
14. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ. NRI/NRT and the evaluation of channel interaction: insights from computational modeling. 2001 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prosthesis, Asilomar, CA, 19-24 August, 2001: 41 (Abstract).