Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 8, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Brill, Stefan ^a   Müller, Joachim ^a   Hagen, Rudolf ^a   Möltner, Alexander ⁱ   Brockmeier, Steffi Johanna ^b,g   Stark, Thomas ^b,c   Helbig, Silke ^d   Maurer, Jan ^e   Zahnert, Thomas ^f   Zierhofer, Clemens ^h   Nopp, Peter ⁱ   Anderson, Ilona ⁱ   Strahl, Stefan ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c St Elisabeth Hospital Bochum   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^e Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^g HNO Universitatsklinik   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

ⁱ MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY NERVE RESPONSE; CLINICAL INVESTIGATION; COCHLEAR REGIONS; COMPETENT AUTHORITIES; ELECTRODE ARRAYS; EVOKED COMPOUND ACTION POTENTIAL; GROWTH FUNCTIONS; INSERTION ANGLES; NEURAL TISSUE; REGISTRATION NUMBER; STEEPER SLOPES; STIMULATING ELECTRODES; STIMULATION SITES; SURVIVAL RATE; SYSTEM SOFTWARES;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; REFRACTORY MATERIALS; TISSUE;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649261456     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-40     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz BJ. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24 M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998, 19(3):320-327.
2. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000, 21(2):151-163. 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009, 10777022.
3. Franck KH. A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential. Ear Hear 2002, 23(1 Suppl):67S-71S. 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00008, 11883769.
4. Franck KH, Norton SJ. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24 M device. Ear Hear 2001, 22(4):289-299. 10.1097/00003446-200108000-00004, 11527036.
5. Hughes ML, Vander Werff KR, Brown C, Abbas P, Kelsay D, Teagle H, Lowder MW. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing 2001, 22:471-486.
6. Hochmair-Desoyer I, Schulz E, Moser L, Schmidt M. The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users. Am J Otol 1997, 18(6 Suppl):S83.
7. Zimmerling M, Hochmair ES. EAP recordings in ineraid patients - correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting. Ear & Hearing 2002, 23:81-91.
8. Abbas PJ, Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Miller CA. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiology & Neuro-Otology 2004, 9(4):203-213. 10.1159/000078390, 15205548.
9. Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, Cowan RSC. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hearing Research 2003, 179:72-87. 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00096-0, 12742240.
10. Cohen LT, Saunders E, Richardson LM. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2004, 43(6):346-355. 10.1080/14992020400050044, 15457817.
11. Zierhofer CM. Multichannel cochlear implant with neural response telemetry. US Patent 2003,
12. Hochmair I, Arnold W, Nopp P, Jolly C, Müller J, Roland P. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol 2003, 123(5):612-617. 10.1080/000164803100001844, 12875584.
13. Polak M, Hodges A, King J, Balkany T. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Hearing Research 2004, 188:104-116. 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00309-5, 14759574.
14. Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear & Hearing 2002, 23:184-197.
15. Anderson I, Deibl M. FS1 Clinical investigation CRD2005CIP001: experienced users final report. 2007,
16. Anderson I, Deibl M. FS1 Clinical investigation CRD2005CIP001: inexperienced users final report. 2007,
17. Marques de Sá J. Applied statistics: Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R 2007, Berlin: Springer, 2.
18. Mauchly J. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1940, 11:204-209.
19. Greenhouse S, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24(2):95-112.
20. Bortz J. Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler 2005, Berlin: Springer.
21. Morsnowski A, Charasse B, Collet L, Killian M, Müller-Deile J. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Audiol Neurootol 2006, 11(6):389-402. 10.1159/000095966, 17008774.
22. Adamson CL, Reid MA, Mo ZL, Bowne-English J, Davis RL. Firing features and potassium channel content of murine spiral ganglion neurons vary with cochlear location. J Comp Neurol 2002, 447(4):331-350. 10.1002/cne.10244, 11992520.
23. Reid MA, Flores-Otero J, Davis RL. Firing patterns of type II spiral ganglion neurons in vitro. J Neurosci 2004, 24(3):733-742. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3923-03.2004, 14736859.
24. Glueckert R, Pfaller K, Kinnefors A, Rask-Andersen H, Schrott-Fischer A. The Human Spiral Ganglion: New insights into ultrastructure, survival rate and implications for cochlear implants. Audiology & Neuro-Otology 2005, 10:258-273. 10.1159/000086000, 15925863.
25. Glueckert R, Pfaller K, Kinnefors A, Schrott-Fischer A, Rask-Andersen H. High resolution scanning electron microscopy of the human organ of Corti. A study using freshly fixed surgical specimens. Hearing Research 2005, 199(1-2):40-56.
26. Lai WK, Dillier N. A Simple Two-Component Model of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in the Human Cochlea. Audiology & Neuro-Otology 2000, 5:333-345. 10.1159/000013899, 11025333.
27. Hamzavi J, Arnoldner C. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception. Acta Otolaryngol 2006, 126(11):1182-1187. 10.1080/00016480600672683, 17050311.