Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructor communication and students' intent to persist in college

Communication Education

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 314-339

  Wheeless, Virginia Eman ^a   Witt, Paul L ^a   Maresh, Michelle ^a   Bryand, Meagan C ^a   Schrodt, Paul ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI   (United States)

Author keywords

College persistence; Communication; Credibility; Instructor; Students' intent

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960616135     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2011.555917     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Andrews, K.R., Silk, K.S., & Eneli, I.U. (2010). Parents as health promoters: A Theory of Planned Behavior perspective on the prevention of childhood obesity. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 95-107.
4. Babrow, A.S., Black, D.R., & Tiffany, S.T. (1990). Beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and a smokingcessation program: a planned behavior analysis of communication campaign development. Health Communication, 2, 145-154.
5. Bagozzia, R.P., Bholakia, U.M., & Mookerjee, A. (2006). Individual and group bases of social influence in online environment. Media Psychology, 8, 95-126.
6. Bauer, K.W., & Bennett, J.S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. Journal of Higher Education, 74, 210-230.
7. Bell, R.A., & Daly, J.A. (1984). The affinity-seeking function of communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 91-115.
8. Berlo, D.K., Lemert, J.B., & Mertz, R.J. (1970). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563-576.
9. Bliss, L.B., & Sandiford, J.R. (2004). Linking study behaviors and student culture to academic success among Hispanic students. Community College Journal of Research, 28, 281-295.
10. Boudreau, C.A., & Kromrey, J.D. (1994). A longitudinal study of the retention and academic performance of participants in freshmen orientation course. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 444-449.
11. Brann, M., & Sutton, M.L. (2009). The Theory of Planned Behavior and college students' willingness to talk about smoking behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 26, 198-207.
12. Braxton, J.M., Sullivan, A., & Johnson, R.M. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 107-164). Bronx, NY: Agathon Press.
13. Brigham, F.J., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastrolpieri, M.A. (1992). Teacher enthusiasm in learning disabilities classrooms: Effects on learning and behavior. Learning disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 68-73.
14. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Christensen, L.J., & Menzel, K.E. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90.
16. Christophel, D.M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-306.
17. Clark, R.K., Keith, S., & Walker, M. (2001, November). Experimentally assessing the student impacts of out-of-class communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
18. Collins, M.L. (1978). Effects of enthusiasm training on preservice elementary teachers. Research in Teacher Education, 29, 53-57.
19. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Attitude strength, attitude structure and resistance to change. In R. Petty & J. Kosnik (Eds.), Attitude strength (pp. 413-432). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Elliot, S. (1979). Perceived homophily as a predictor of classroom learning. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook III (pp. 585-602). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
21. Feldman, K.A. (1976). The superior college teacher from the students' view. Research in Higher Education, 5, 243-288.
22. Finn, A.N., Schrodt, P., Witt, P.L., Elledge, N., Jernberg, K.A., & Larson, L.M. (2009). A metaanalytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 516-537.
23. Fischer, M.J. (2007). Settling into campus life: Differences by race/ethnicity in college involvement and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 125-161.
24. Frymier, A.B. (1993). The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy, and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17.
25. Frymier, A.B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
26. Frymier, A.B., & Thompson, C.A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
27. Glascock, J., & Ruggiero, T.E. (2006). The relationship of ethnicity and sex to professor credibility at a culturally diverse university. Communication Education, 55, 197-207.
28. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to healthrelated behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87-98.
29. Gomez, C.F., & Pearson, J.C. (1990). Students' perceptions of the credibility and homophily of native and non-native English speaking teaching assistants. Communication Research Reports, 7, 58-62.
30. Grandy, J. (1998). Persistence in science of high-ability minority students. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 589-620.
31. Gudykunst, W.G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., & Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
34. Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S.L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36-74.
35. Hurtado, S., Milem, J.F., Clayton-Pederson, A.R., & Allen, W.R. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 279-302.
36. Jaasma, M.A., & Koper, R.J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
37. Jang, S.A., & Yoo, J.A. (2009). Topic avoidance in close relationships: applying the theory of planned behavior. Human Communication, 12, 119-235.
38. Johnson, S.D., & Miller, A.N. (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education, 51, 280-292.
39. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
40. Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(5), 53-76.
41. Little, T.D., Card, N.A., Slegers, D.W., & Ledford, E.C. (2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In T.D. Little, J.A. Bovaird, & N.A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121-147). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
43. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users' acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 29-39.
44. Marlin, J.W. (1991). State-mandated economic education, teacher attitudes, and student Learning. Journal of Economic Education, 22, 5-14.
45. Martin, M.M., Chesebro, J.L., & Mottet, T.P. (1997). Students' perceptions of instructors' sociocommunicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17, 431-440.
46. Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., & Simonds, C.J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 175-183.
47. McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P. (1992). Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. McCroskey, J.C., Richmond, V.P., & Daly, J.A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication, 1, 323-332.
49. McCroskey, J.C., & Teven, J.J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
50. McCroskey, J.C., Valencic, K.M., & Richmond, V.P. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 197-210.
51. McCroskey, J.C., & Wheeless, L.R. (1976). Introduction to human communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. McCroskey, J.C., & Young, T.J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24-34.
53. McDaniel, C., & Graham, S.W. (2010). Student retention in an historically Black institution. College Student Journal, 35, 143-177.
54. McGrath, M., & Braunstein, A. (1997). The prediction of freshmen attrition: An examination of the importance of certain demographic, academic, financial and social factors. College Student Journal, 31, 396-408.
55. McMillan, J.H. (1976). The development of pupil attitudes toward school subjects. Psychology in the Schools, 13, 322-325.
56. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
57. Myers, R.D. (2003). College success programs: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Pathways to College Network.
58. Myers, S. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17, 129-137.
59. Myers, S.A., Horan, S.M., Kennedy-Lightsey, C.D., Madlock, P.E., Sidelinger, R.J., Byres, K., Frisby, B., & Mansson, D.H. (2009). The relationship between college students' self-reports of class participation and perceived instructor impressions. Communication Research Reports, 26, 1-12.
60. Neuliep, J.W. (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44, 267-278.
61. Neuliep, J.W., & McCroskey, J.C. (1997). The development of a U.S. and generalized ethnocentrism scale. Communication Research Reports, 14, 385-398.
62. Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1979). Interaction effects in Spady's and Tinto's conceptual models of college dropout. Sociology of Education, 52, 197-210.
63. Patrick, B.C., Hisley, J., Kempler, T., & College, G. (2000). What's everybody so excited about?" The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 217-237.
64. Patton, T.O. (1999). Ethnicity and gender: An examination of its impact on instructor credibility in the university classroom. The Howard Journal of Communications, 10, 123-144.
65. Plax, T.G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-56.
66. Pogue, L.L., & AhYun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55, 331-344.
67. Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., & Johnson, A.D. (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 504-517.
68. Roberto, A.J., Meyer, G., Boster, F.J., & Roberto, H.L. (2003). Adolescents, decisions about verbal and Physical aggresssion: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Human Communication Research, 29, 135-147.
69. Rocca, K.A. (2004). College student attendance: Impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression. Communication Education, 53, 185-195.
70. Rocca, K.A., & McCroskey, J.C. (1999). The interrelationship of student ratings of instructors' immediacy, verbal aggressiveness, homophily, and interpersonal attractiveness. Communication Education, 48, 308-317.
71. Rogers, E.M., & Bhowmik, D.K. (1971). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523-538.
72. Sanders, J.A., & Wiseman, R.L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
73. Schrodt, P. (2003). Students' appraisals of instructors as function of students' perceptions of instructors' aggressive communication. Communication Education, 52, 106-122.
74. Schrodt, P., & Turman, P. (2005). The influence of instructional technology use on students' affect: Do course designs and biological sex make a difference? Communication Studies, 56, 109-129.
75. Schrodt, P., Turman, P.D., & Witt, P.L. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308-332.
76. Schrodt, P., & Witt, P.L. (2006). Students' attributions of instructor credibility as a function of students' expectations of instructional technology use and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 55, 1-20.
77. Schrodt, P., Witt, P.L., Turman, P.D., Myers, S., Barton, M.H., & Jernberg, K.A. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructor's prosocial communication behaviors and students' learning outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350-371.
78. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A metaanalysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.
79. Sorensen, G., & Beatty, M.J. (1988). The interactive effects of touch and touch avoidance on interpersonal evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 5, 84-90.
80. Stewart, R.A. (1989). Interaction effects of teacher enthusiasm and student notetaking on recall and recognition of lecture content. Communication Research Reports, 6, 84-89.
81. St. John, E.P., Paulsen, M.B., & Carter, D.F. (2005). Diversity, college costs, and postsecondary opportunity: An examination of the financial nexus between college choice and persistence for African Americans and Whites. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 545-569.
82. Terenzini, P.T., & Pascarella, E.T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. The Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60-75.
83. Teven, J.J. (2001). The relationships among teacher characteristics and perceived caring. Communication Education, 50, 159-169.
84. Teven, J.J., & Hanson, T.L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52, 39-53.
85. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2008). Closing the gaps*success progress. Retrieved from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/GeneralPubs/Agenda/Ag2005-04/VA/VAP.pdf-2009-05-11
86. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
87. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Statistics. (2009). Web tables*Profile of undergraduate students: Trends from selected years 1995-96 and 2007-08. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid-2010220
88. Wheeless, L.R. (1974). The effects of attitude, credibility, and homophily on selective exposure to information. Speech Monographs, 41(4), 329-338.
89. Witt, P.L. (2008, May). Communicative connection: A theoretical clarification of the role of teacher immediacy in classroom communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
90. Witt, P.L., & Schrodt, P. (2006). The influence of instructional technology use and teacher immediacy on student affect for teacher and course. Communication Reports, 19(1), 1-15.
91. Witt, P.L., Schrodt, P., & Turman, P.D. (2010). Instructor immediacy: Creating connections conducive to classroom. In D.L. Fassett & J.T. Warren (Eds.), The Handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 201-219). Los Angeles: Sage.
92. Witt, P.L., & Wheeless, L.R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342.
93. Witt, P.L., Wheeless, L.R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184-207.
94. Zhang, Q. (2009). Perceived teacher credibility and student learning: Development of a multicultural model. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 326-347.
95. Zhang, Q., Oetzel, J.G., Gao, Z., Wilcox, R.G., & Takai, J. (2007). A further test of immediacylearning models: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 36, 1-13.