The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning

Communication Education

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 331-344

  Pogue, Lanette L ^b   AhYun, Kimo ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Affective Learning; Student Motivation; Teacher Credibility; Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745558587     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520600748623     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen, P. A. (1973, November). An experimental study to assess the effects of source credibility on apprehension. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New York: New York.
3. Beatty, M. J., & Behnke, R. R. (1980). Teacher credibility as a function of verbal content and paralinguistic cues. Communication Quarterly, 28, 55-59.
4. Beatty, M. J., & Zahn, C. J. (1990). Are student ratings of communication instructors due to 'easy' grading practices? An analysis of teacher credibility and student-reported performance levels. Communication Education, 39, 275-282.
5. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
7. Brophy, J. (1987). On motivating students. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201-245). New York: Random House.
8. Chamberlin, C. R. (2000). Nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of trustworthiness in teacher-supervisor relationships. Communication Education, 49, 352-364.
9. Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52, 135-147.
10. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The relationship of teacher clarity and teacher immediacy with students' experiences of state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Quarterly, 46, 446-456.
11. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59-68.
12. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
13. Christophel, D. M., Sx Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-316.
14. Ellis, K. (1995). Apprehension, self-perceived competency, and teacher immediacy in the laboratory-supported public speaking course: Trends and relationships. Communication Education, 44, 64-78.
15. Frymier, A. B. (1993). The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17.
16. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
17. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207-219.
18. Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). "What's in it for me?" Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40-50.
19. Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
20. Fusani, D. S. (1994). "Extra-class" communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-257.
21. Gigliotti, R. J. (1987). Are they getting what they expect? Teaching Sociology, 15, 365-375.
22. Hunter, J. E., & Hamilton, M. A. (1992). CFA. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
23. Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48, 41-47.
24. Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1991). An attributional analysis of college students' resistance decisions. Communication Education, 40, 325-342.
25. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Smith, V. R., & Sorensen, G. (1988). Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on-task demands. Communication Education, 37, 54-67.
26. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33, 61-74.
27. Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
28. Knight, A. B. (2002). Teacher credibility: A tool for diagnosing problems in teacher/student relationships. Retrieved October 2, 2004, from University of Oklahoma, Instructional Development Program Web site: http://www.ou.edu/idp/ tips/ideas/credibility.html
29. Levine, T. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62-72.
30. Martin, M. M., Chesebro, J. L., & Mottet, T. P. (1997). Students' perceptions of instructors' socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17, 431-440.
31. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.
33. McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24-34.
34. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35. Messman, S. J., & Jones-Corley, J. (2001). Effects of communication environment, immediacy, and communication apprehension on cognitive and affective learning. Communication Monographs, 68, 184-200.
36. Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
37. Munn, H. E., & Giffin, K. (1973). Relationships between teachers' task-oriented behavior, interpersonal maintenance behavior, student achievement, and student satisfaction. Speech Teacher, 22, 304-309.
38. Myers, S. A., & Bryant, L. E. (2004). College students' perceptions of how instructors convey credibility. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 5, 22-27.
39. Myers, S. A., & Knox, R. L. (2001). The relationship between college student information-seeking behaviors and perceived instructor verbal behaviors. Communication Education, 50, 343-357.
40. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
42. Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
43. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44. Rodriguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
45. Rubin, R. B., & Feezel, J. D. (1986). Elements of teacher communication competence. Communication Education, 35, 254-268.
46. Scott, M. D., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Student perceptions of instructor communication behaviors and their relationship to student evaluation. Communication Education, 30, 44-53.
47. Teven, J. J., & Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52, 39-53.
48. Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-8.
49. Thweatt, K. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47, 348-358.
50. Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342.
51. Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184-207.