Writing groups for doctoral education

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 905-916

  Aitchison, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960596655     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070902785580     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aitchison, C. 2003. Thesis writing circles. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 8, no. 2: 97–115.
2. Aitchison, C., and A. Lee. 2006. Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 3: 265–78.
3. Bazerman, C., and P. Prior. 2004. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analysing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Boud, D., and A. Lee. 2009. Changing practices of doctoral education. London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. 1981. Distinction. Trans. R. Nice. London: Routledge.
5. Brew, A., and T. Peseta. 2009. Supervision development and recognition in a reflexive space. In Changing practices of doctoral education, ed. D. Boud and A. Lee, 126–39. London: Routledge.
6. Caffarella, R.S., and B.G. Barnett. 2000. Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education 25: 39–54.
7. Elbow, P. 1997. High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. New directions for teaching and learning 69: 5–13.
8. Ivanic, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Kamler, B., and P. Thomson. 2006. Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.
10. Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2000. Participatory action research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 567–605. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Lea, M.R. 2004. Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 6: 739–56.
13. Leander, K., and P. Prior. 2004. Speaking and writing: How talk and text interact in situated practices. In What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, ed. C. Bazerman and P. Prior, 201–37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Lee, A., and C. Aitchison. 2009. Writing for the doctorate and beyond. In Changing practices of doctoral education, ed. D. Boud and A. Lee 2009, 87–99. London: Routledge.
15. Lillis, T.M. 2001. Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
16. Lillis, T.M. 2006. Moving towards an ‘Academic Literacies’ pedagogy: Dialogues of participation. In Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practices and models, ed. L. Ganobcsik-Williams, 30–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. McIntyre, J., and C. Symes, eds. 2000. Working knowledge: The new vocationalism and higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
18. Morss, K., and R. Murray. 2001. Researching academic writing within a structured programme: Insights and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education 26, no. 1: 35–52.
19. Murray, R., and S. Moore. 2006. The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
20. Mutch, A. 2003. Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education 4, no. 1: 24–38.
21. Orrell, J. 2006. Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 4: 441–56.
22. Paltridge, B., and S. Starfield. 2007. Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge.
23. Rollinson, P. 2005. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 59, no. 1: 23–30.
24. Wingate, U. 2006. Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 4: 457–69.
25. Yates, L. 2004. What does good education research look like? Maidenhead: Open University Press.