Justice as a Dynamic Construct: Effects of Individual Trajectories on Distal Work Outcomes

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 872-880

  Hausknecht, John P ^a   Sturman, Michael C ^b   Roberson, Quinetta M ^c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b 335 Statler Hall   (United States)

^c VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Organizational justice; Time; Turnover intentions; Work attitudes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; JOB SATISFACTION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; EMPLOYMENT; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JOB SATISFACTION; PERSONNEL TURNOVER; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 79960540770     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022991     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen N.J., Meyer J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 1990, 63:1-18.
2. Ambrose M.L., Cropanzano R. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:266-275. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.266.
3. Ariely D., Carmon Z. Gestalt characteristics of experiences: The defining features of summarized events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000, 13:191-201. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<191::AID-BDM330>3.0.CO;2-A.
4. Ariely D., Carmon Z. Summary assessments of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice 2003, 323-349. Sage, New York, NY. G. Loewenstein, D. Read, R. Baumeister (Eds.).
5. Bentein K., Vandenberg R., Vandenberghe C., Stinglhamber F. The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:468-482. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468.
6. Boswell W.R., Boudreau J.W., Tichy J. The relationship between job change and job satisfaction: The honeymoon-hangover effect. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:882-892. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.882.
7. Boswell W.R., Shipp A.J., Payne S.C., Culbertson S.S. Changes in newcomer job satisfaction over time: Examining the pattern of honeymoons and hangovers. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:844-858. doi: 10.1037/a0014975.
8. Chen G. Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:101-116.
9. Chen, G., Ployhart, R. E., Cooper-Thomas, H., Anderson, N., & Bliese, P. D. (in press). The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal.
10. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:386-400. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
11. Colquitt J.A., Conlon D.E., Wesson M.J., Porter C.O.L.H., Ng K.Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:425-445. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.
12. Fredrickson B.L., Kahneman D. Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:45-55. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45.
13. Greenberg J., Colquitt J.A. The handbook of organizational justice 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Hackman J.R., Oldham G.R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60:159-170. doi: 10.1037/h0076546.
15. Harrison D.A., Virick M., William S. Working without a net: Time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:331-345. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.331.
16. Holtz B.C., Harold C.M. Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:1185-1199. doi: 10.1037/a0015900.
17. Hsee C.K., Abelson R.P. Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:341-347. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.341.
18. Inness M., LeBlanc M.M., Barling J. Psychosocial predictors of supervisor, peer, subordinate, and service provider targeted aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:1401-1411. doi: 10.1037/a0012810.
19. Kahneman D. Objective happiness. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology 1999, 3-25. Sage, New York, NY. D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwartz (Eds.).
20. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291. doi: 10.2307/1914185.
21. Kammeyer-Mueller J.D., Wanberg C.R., Glomb T.M., Ahlburg D. The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: It's about time. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:644-658. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.644.
22. Kelloway E.K., Gottlieb B.H., Barham L. The source, nature, and direction of work and family conflict: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1999, 4:337-346. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.4.4.337.
23. Lind E.A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in organizational justice 2001, 56-88. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (Eds.).
24. Lindsley D.H., Brass D.J., Thomas J.B. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20:645-678. doi: 10.2307/258790.
25. Loi R., Yang J., Diefendorff J.M. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:770-781. doi: 10.1037/a0015714.
26. Louis M.R. Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly 1980, 25:226-251. doi: 10.2307/2392453.
27. Mathieu J.E., Rapp T.L. Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:90-103. doi: 10.1037/a0013257.
28. Piccolo R.F., Colquitt J.A. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49:327-340.
29. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
30. Reb J., Cropanzano R. Evaluating dynamic performance: The influence of salient Gestalt characteristics on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:490-499. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.490.
31. Richardson H.A., Simmering M.J., Sturman M.C. A tale of three paradigms: Examining post hoc statistical corrections for common method variance from three divergent perspectives. Organizational Research Methods 2009, 12:762-800. doi: 10.1177/1094428109332834.
32. Siemsen E., Roth A., Oliveira P. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods 2010, 13:456-476. doi: 10.1177/1094428109351241.
33. Singer J.D., Willett J.B. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence 2003, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
34. Sturman M.C. The past, present, and future of dynamic performance research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 2007, 26:49-110. doi: 10.1016/S0742-7301(07)26002-5.
35. Sturman M.C., Trevor C.O. The implications of linking the dynamic performance and turnover literatures. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:684-696. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.684.
36. Taylor M.S. Reflections on fairness: Continuing the progression of justice research and practice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001, 58:243-253. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1796.
37. Thelen E., Smith L.B. Dynamic systems theories. Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development 1998, 563-634. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 5th ed. W. Damon, R.M. Lerner (Eds.).
38. Truxillo D.M., Bauer T.N., Campion M.A., Paronto M.E. Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:1020-1031. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1020.
39. Vandenberg R.J., Lance C.E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 2000, 3:4-70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002.
40. van den Bos K. Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice 2001, 63-84. Information Age, Greenwich, CT. S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, D. Skarlicki (Eds.).
41. van den Bos K., Burrows J.W., Umphress E., Folger R., Lavelle J.J., Eaglestone J., Gee J. Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference in social justice: The influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors. Social Justice Research 2005, 18:99-120. doi: 10.1007/s11211-005-7365-4.