Variations in Recollection: The Effects of Complexity on Source Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 861-873

  Parks, Colleen M ^a   Murray, Linda J ^b   Elfman, Kane ^b   Yonelinas, Andrew P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Familiarity; Receiver operating characteristics; Recognition; Recollection; Source

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMNESIA; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960321944     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022798     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bacon F.T. Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1979, 5:241-252.
2. DeCarlo L.T. Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2003, 47:292-303.
3. Diana R.A., Reder L.M., Arndt J., Park H. Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1-21.
4. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:730-740.
5. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:1808-1818.
6. Elfman K.W., Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:752-768.
7. Elfman, K., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2011). Testing recognition memory predictions of the complementary learning system model. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Glanzer M., Hilford A., Kim K. Six regularities of source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:1176-1195.
9. Gruppuso V., Lindsay D.S., Kelley C.M. The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:259-278.
10. Harvey E.H. Reader's Digest book of facts 1987, The Reader's Digest Association, New York, NY.
11. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
12. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
13. Kelley R., Wixted J.T. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:701-722.
14. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
15. Malmberg K.J. On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:380-387.
16. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
17. Manns J.R., Hopkins R.O., Reed J.M., Kitchener E.G., Squire L.R. Recognition memory and the human hippocampus. Neuron 2003, 37:171-180.
18. Norman K.A., O'Reilly R.C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review 2003, 110:611-646.
19. Onyper S.V., Zhang Y., Howard M.W. Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:341-364.
20. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:188-201.
21. Parks T.E. Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. Psychological Review 1966, 73:44-58.
22. Qin J., Raye C.L., Johnson M.K., Mitchell K.J. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1110-1115.
23. Quamme J.R., Yonelinas A.P., Norman K.A. Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus 2007, 17:192-200.
24. Rempel-Clower N.L., Zola S.M., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G. Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:5233-5255.
25. Sherman S.J., Atri A., Hasselmo M.E., Stern C.E., Howard M.W. Scopolamine impairs human recognition memory: Data and modeling. Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 117:526-539.
26. Slotnick S.D., Dodson C.S. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:151-170.
27. Slotnick S.D., Klein S.A., Dodson C.S., Shimamura A.P. An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1499-1517.
28. Staresina B.P., Davachi L. Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:9162-9172.
29. Symons M. The other book of the most perfectly useless information 2006, HarperCollins, New York, NY.
30. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology 1985, 26:1-12.
31. Wechsler D. Manual for Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised 1987, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
32. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176.
33. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1341-1354.
34. Yonelinas A.P. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1415-1434.
35. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
36. Yonelinas A.P., Aly M., Wang W.C., Koen J.D. Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus 2010, 20:1178-1194. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20864.
37. Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Quamme J.R., Lazzara M.M., Sauve M.J., Widaman K.F., Knight R.T. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:1236-1241.
38. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:800-832.
39. Yonelinas A.P., Quamme J.R., Widaman K.F., Kroll N.E.A., Sauvé M.J., Knight R.T. Mild hypoxia disrupts recollection, not familiarity. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4:393-400.