Some-or-None Recollection: Evidence From Item and Source Memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 341-364

  Onyper, Serge V ^a   Zhang, Yaofei X ^b   Howard, Marc W ^b  

^a ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual process model; Recognition memory; ROC; Signal detection theory (SDT); Source memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 77954792293     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018926     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aggleton J.P., Vann S.D., Denby C., Dix S., Mayes A.R., Roberts N., Yonelinas A.P. Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1810-1823.
2. Banks W.P. Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science 2000, 11:267-273.
3. Batchelder W.J., Riefer D.M. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 1990, 97:548-564.
4. Bowles B., Crupi C., Mirsattari S.M., Pigott S.E., Parrent A.G., Pruessner J.C., Kohler S. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:16382-16387.
5. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach 2002, Springer, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
6. Coltheart M. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981, 33A:497-505.
7. Criss A.H., Shiffrin R.M. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review 2004, 111:800-807.
8. DeCarlo L.T. Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review 2002, 109:710-721.
9. DeCarlo L.T. An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:767-778.
10. DeCarlo L.T. Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2003, 47:292-303.
11. DeCarlo L.T. The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:18-33.
12. Dennis S., Humphreys M.S. A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review 2001, 108:452-478.
13. Diana R.A., Reder L.M., Arndt J., Park H. Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1-21.
14. Dunn J.C. Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review 2004, 111:524-542.
15. Duzel E., Yonelinas A.P., Mangun G.R., Heinze H.J., Tulving E. Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1997, 94:5973-5978.
16. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:123-152.
17. Elfman K.W., Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:752-768.
18. Farovik A., Dupont L.M., Arce M., Eichenbaum H. Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:13428-13434.
19. Fortin N.J., Wright S.P., Eichenbaum H. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 2004, November 1, 431:188-191.
20. Glanzer M., Adams J.K., Iverson G.J., Kim K. The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review 1993, 100:546-567.
21. Glanzer M., Hilford A., Kim K. Six regularities of source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 30:1176-1195.
22. Glanzer M., Kim K., Hilford A., Adams J.K. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:500-513.
23. Good M.A., Barnes P., Staal V., McGregor A., Honey R.C. Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 121:218-223.
24. Hautus M.J., Macmillan N.A., Rotello C.M. Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 15:889-905.
25. Healy M.R., Light L.L., Chung C. Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: Evidence from receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:768-788.
26. Heathcote A. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:1210-1230.
27. Heathcote A., Raymond F., Dunn J. Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:495-514.
28. Hilford A., Glanzer M., Kim K., DeCarlo L.T. Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:494-510.
29. Holdstock J.S., Mayes A.R., Roberts N., Cezayirli E., Isaac C.L., O'Reilly R.C., Norman K.A. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?. Hippocampus 2002, 12:341-351.
30. Howard M.W., Bessette-Symons B.A., Zhang Y., Hoyer W.J. Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: Evidence from modeling and ROC curves. Psychology and Aging 2006, 21:96-106.
31. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90:773-795.
32. Kelley R., Wixted J.T. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:701-722.
33. Macho S. Modeling associative recognition: A comparison of two-high-threshold, two-high-threshold signal detection, and mixture distribution models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:83-97.
34. Macmillan N.A., Rotello C.M., Miller J.O. The sampling distributions of Gaussian ROC statistics. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:406-421.
35. Malmberg K.J. On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:380-387.
36. Malmberg K.J., Xu J. The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:99-105.
37. Meiser T., Broder A. Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:116-137.
38. Meiser T., Sattler C., Weisser K. Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:32-49.
39. Mickes L., Wais P.E., Wixted J.T. Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Psychological Science 2009, 20:509-515.
40. Mickes L., Wixted J.T., Wais P.E. A direct test of the unequal-variance signal-detection model of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:858-865.
41. Murdock B.B. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004). Psychological Review 2006, 113:648-656.
42. Norman K.A., O'Reilly R.C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychological Review 2003, 110:611-646.
43. Paller K.A., Hutson C.A., Miller B.B., Boehm S.G. Neural manifestations of memory with and without awareness. Neuron 2003, 38:507-516.
44. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:188-202.
45. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Postscript: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:201-202.
46. Pitt M.A., Myung I.J., Zhang S. Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review 2002, 109:472-491.
47. Ratcliff R., McKoon G., Tindall M. Empirical generality of data from recognition memory ROC functions and implications for GMMs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:763-785.
48. Ratcliff R., Sheu C.F., Gronlund S.D. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review 1992, 99:518-535.
49. Robitsek R.J., Fortin N.J., Koh M.T., Gallagher M., Eichenbaum H. Cognitive aging: A common decline of episodic recollection and spatial memory in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:8945-8954.
50. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., Reeder J.A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review 2004, 111:588-616.
51. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., Reeder J.A., Wong M. The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:865-873.
52. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
53. Sauvage M.M., Fortin N.J., Owens C.B., Yonelinas A.P., Eichenbaum H. Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:16-18.
54. Schwartz G., Howard M.W., Jing B., Kahana M.J. Shadows of the past: Temporal retrieval effects in recognition memory. Psychological Science 2005, 16:898-904.
55. Sherman S.J., Atri A., Hasselmo M.E., Stern C.E., Howard M.W. Scopolamine impairs human recognition memory: Data and modeling. Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 117:526-539.
56. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:145-166.
57. Slotnick S.D., Dodson C.S. Support for a continuous (single process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:151-170.
58. Slotnick S.D., Klein S.A., Dodson C.S., Shimamura A.P. An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1499-1517.
59. Starns J.J., Hicks J.L. Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1213-1220.
60. Starns J.J., Hicks J.L., Brown N.L., Martin B.A. Source memory for unrecognized items: Predictions from multivariate signal detection theory. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1-8.
61. Uncapher M.R., Rugg M.D. Encoding and the durability of episodic memory: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:7260-7267.
62. Verfaillie M., Treadwell J.R. Status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology 1993, 7:5-13.
63. Wagenmakers E.J., Farrell S. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:192-196.
64. Wais P.E., Wixted J.T., Hopkins R.O., Squire L.R. The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuron 2006, 49:459-466.
65. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176.
66. Wixted J.T. Spotlighting the probative findings: Reply to Parks and Yonelinas (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:203-209.
67. Wixted J.T., Stretch V. In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:616-641.
68. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1341-1354.
69. Yonelinas A.P. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1415-1434.
70. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
71. Yonelinas A.P., Dobbins I.G., Szymanski M.D., Dhaliwal H.S., King S. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. Consciousness and Cognition 1996, 5:418-441.
72. Yonelinas A.P., Kroll N.E., Quamme J.R., Lazzara M.M., Sauvé M.J., Widaman K.F., Knight R.T. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:1236-1241.
73. Yonelinas A.P., Otten L.J., Shaw K.N., Rugg M.D. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:3002-3008.
74. Yonelinas A.P., Parks C.M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:800-832.
75. Yovel G., Paller K.A. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: When a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage 2004, 21:789-800.