An investigation of the partial-assignment completion effect on students' assignment choice behavior

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 433-442

  Hawthorn Embree, Meredith L ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^a   Parkhurst, John ^a   Conley, Elisha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Discrete task completion hypothesis; Partial assignment completion effect; Student choice; Task interruption

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MALE; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; STUDENTS;

EID: 79959864593     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Billington E.J., Skinner C.H., Cruchon N.M. Improving sixth-grade student's perceptions of high-effort assignments by assigning more work: Interaction of additive interspersal and assignment effort on assignment choice. Journal of School Psychology 2004, 42:477-490.
2. Butterfield E.C. The role of competence motivation in interrupted task recall and repetition choice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1965, 2:354-370.
3. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H. Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 40% more problems? An investigation of the strength of the interspersal procedure. Psychology in the Schools 2000, 37:339-347.
4. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H., Watson T.W., Meadows T.J., Weaver A., Jackson B. Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of Interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review 2003, 32:601-616.
5. Cooke N.L., Guzaukas R., Pressley J.S., Kerr K. Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children 1993, 16:213-234.
6. Deno S.L., Mirkin P.K. Data-based program modification: A manual 1977, Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA.
7. Friman P.C., Poling A. Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1995, 28:583-590.
8. Fudge D.L., Skinner C.H., Williams J.L., Cowden D., Clark J., Bliss S.L. The color wheel classroom management system: Increasing on-task behavior in every student in a second-grade classroom. Journal of School Psychology 2008, 46:575-592.
9. Gardner R., Heward W.L., Grossi T.A. Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994, 27:63-71.
10. Haring N.G., Eaton M.D. Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. The fourth R: Research in the classroom 1978, 23-40. Merrill, Columbus OH. N.G. Haring, T.C. Lovitt, M.D. Eaton, C.L. Hansen (Eds.).
11. Haydon T., Mancil G.R., Van Loan C. Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children 2009, 32:267-278.
12. Ivarie J.J. Effects of proficiency rates of later performance of recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education 1986, 7:25-30.
13. Joseph L.M., Nist L.M. Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education 2006, 15:69-79.
14. Katz E. Some factors affecting resumption of interrupted activities by preschool children. The Institute of Child Welfare Monograph Series 1938, 16. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
15. MacMillan D.L. Resumption of interrupted tasks by normal and educable mentally retarded subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1969, 73:657-660.
16. MacQuarrie-Klender L.L., Tucker J.A., Burns M., Hartman B. Comparison of retention rates using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review 2002, 31:584-595.
17. McCurdy M., Skinner C.H., Grantham K., Watson T.S., Hindman P.M. Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seat-work by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review 2001, 30:23-32.
18. Navarro A.D., Fantino E. The sunk-time effect: An exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2009, 22:252-270.
19. Neef N.A., Iwata B.A., Page T.J. The effects of known-item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight-reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1977, 10:738.
20. Neef N.A., Shade D., Miller M.S. Assessing the influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1994, 27:575-583.
21. Nist L., Joseph L.M. Effectiveness and efficiency of variations of flash card drills on word recognition maintenance and generalization. School Psychology Review 2008, 37:294-308.
22. Rickers-Ovsiankina The resumption of interrupted activities. Field theory as human Science 1976, 49-109. Gardner Press, New York. J. De Rivera (Ed.).
23. Roberts M.C., Shapiro E.S. Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a general education classroom. Journal of School Psychology 1996, 34:73-91.
24. Roberts M.C., Turco T.C., Shapiro E.S. Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 1991, 9:308-318.
25. Shapiro E.S. Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention 2004, Guilford Press, New York. 3rd Ed.
26. Skinner C.H. An empirical analysis of interspersal research: Evidence, implications and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology 2002, 40:347-368.
27. Skinner C.H. Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review 2008, 37:309-315.
28. Skinner C.H. Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools 2010, 47:166-172.
29. Skinner C.H., Bamberg H., Smith E.S., Powell S. Subvocal responding to increase division fact fluency. Remedial and Special Education 1993, 14:49-56.
30. Skinner C.H., Belfiore P.J., Mace H.W., Williams S., Johns G.A. Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly 1997, 12:54-64.
31. Skinner C.H., Daly E.J. Improving generalization of academic skills: Commentary on the special series. Journal of Behavioral Education 2010, 19:106-115.
32. Skinner C.H., Fletcher P.A., Henington C. Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly 1996, 11:313-325.
33. Skinner C.H., Robinson S.L., Johns G.A., Logan P., Belfiore P.J. Applying Herrnstein's matching law to influence students' choice to complete difficult academic assignments. Journal of Experimental Education 1996, 65:5-17.
34. Skinner C.H., Wallace M.A., Neddenriep C.E. Academic remediation: Educational applications of research on assignment preference and choice. Child and Family Behavior Therapy 2002, 24:51-65.
35. Slate J.R., Saudargas R.A. Differences in learning disabled and average students' classroom behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly 1986, 9:61-67.
36. Thames E.A. The sunk-cost effect: The importance of context. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1996, 11:817-826.
37. Tobin K.G. The effects of wait-time on classroom learning. European Journal of Science Education 1983, 5:35-48.
38. Wallace M.A., Cox E.A., Skinner C.H. Increasing independent seat-work: Breaking large assignments into smaller assignments and teaching a student with retardation to recruit reinforcement. School Psychology Review 2003, 23:132-142.