Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 54-64

  Skinner, Christopher H ^a,d   Belfiore, Phillip J ^b   Mace, Holly W ^c   Williams Wilson, Shandra ^a   Johns, Gregg A ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^d Box 9727 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041716673     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0088947     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albers, A. E., & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predicator of effective instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337-354.
2. Arter, J. A., & Jenkins, J. R. (1979). Differential diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517-555.
3. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
4. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. H. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying human behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
5. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus upon applied behavior analysis in education (pp.58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6. Ivarie, J. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 25-30.
7. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54, 228-239.
8. Kirk, S., McCarthy, J., & Kirk, W. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
9. Kulak, A. G. (1993). Parallels between math and reading disability: Common issues and approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 666-673.
10. Reschley, D. J., & Wilson, M. S. (1990). Cognitive processing versus traditional intelligence: Diagnostic utility, intervention implications, and treatment validity. School Psychology Review, 19, 443-458.
11. Shapiro, E. S. (1989). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford.
12. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenburg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
13. Sisterhen, D. H., & Gerber, P. J. (1989). Auditory, visual and multisensory nonverbal social perceptions in adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 245-249.
14. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., & Watson, T. S. (1995). Assessing the relative effects of interventions in students with mild disabilities: Assessing instructional time. Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 2, 207-220.
15. Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M., & Yunker, B. D. (1991). A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behavior disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 56-65.
16. Skinner, C. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123-133.
17. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-368.
18. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, R. G. (1986). Achieving educational excellence: Using behavioral strategies. New York: Holt.
19. Van Houten, R., & Thompson, C. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 227-230.
20. Wong, B. Y. L. (1986). Problems and issues in definition of learning disabilities. In J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 3-26). New York: Academic Press.