Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: Strategies and students' perceptions;Bewertung kollaborativer arbeit in einem gemischten hochschulbildungs- lernkontext: Strategien und wahrnehmungen der studenten

Educational Media International

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 217-229

  Pombo, Lúcia ^a   Loureiro, Maria João ^a   Moreira, António ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Collaborative work; Evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959651492     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2010.518814     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. APDSI (Association for the Promotion and Development of the Information Society). (2007). e-Inclusão-Um desafio para Portugal, [e-inclusion-a Portuguese challenge]. Retrieved from http://www.apdsi.pt.
2. Bradley, S.A., & McConnel, D. (2008). Virtual groups in learning environments: Collaboration, cooperation or (self) centred individualism? Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, Halkidiki.
3. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duigard, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 1, 32-41.
4. Carneiro, R. (2003). A evolução do e-Learning em Portugal [The evolution of e-learning in Portugal] (Colecção Formação a Distância & e-Learning, 3). Lisbon: INOFOR.
5. Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2004). Criteria for evaluation of success of blended learning methodology. Paper presented at the EAGE 66th Conference & Exhibition, Paris.
6. Coughlan, A. (2004). Evaluating the learning experience: The case for a student feedback system. Quality Promotion Office. Maynooth, National University of Ireland. Retrieved from http://qpo.nuim.ie/quality/documents/DocumentA.pdf
7. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
8. Draper, S. W. (2007). A momentary review of assessment principles. Paper presented at the REAP Conference-Assessment design for learner responsibility. Retrieved from http:// www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/rap/nicol7.html.
9. Ehlers, U-D. (2007). Towards greater quality literacy in a eLearning Europe. eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1-11.
10. European Commission (Directorate-General for Education and Culture) (2006). TELL: Towards Effective network supported collaborative learning activities. Introducing a Framework for the Evaluation of Network Supported Collaborative Learning. WP1 Deliverable, Project number: EAC/61/03/GR009, ELearning Initiative.
11. Felder R.M., & Brent, R. (2004). How to evaluate teaching. Chemical Engineering Education, 38(3), 200-202.
12. Gray, R. (2002). Assessing students written projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 91, 37-42.
13. Johnson, D. W., Johnson R.T., & Stanne, M.B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A metaanalysis. Retrieved 9 February 2010, from http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods. html
14. Jones, C. (2007). Designing for practice: Practising design in the social sciences. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 167-179). London: Routledge.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Liang, X., & Creasy, K. (2004). Classroom assessment in web-based instructional environment: instructors' experience. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(7). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=7.
17. Loureiro, M. J., Pombo, L., Balula, A., & Moreira, A (2007a). Integrating e-assessment as an inmost part of the teaching and learning process. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Chesapeake, Quebec City.
18. Loureiro, M.J., Neto, A., Oliveira, T., Chagas, I., Bettencourt, T., Cid, M., Marques, L., Praia, J., Santos, C., Costa, N., & Guerra, C. (2007b). Science education research and school practices: Building an online community of practice. Paper presented at the International Council of Educational Media, Nicosia.
19. Meyen, E.L., Aust, R.J., Bui, Y.N., & Isaacson, R. (2002). Assessing and monitoring student progress in an e-learning personnel preparation environment. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(2), 187-198.
20. Naismith, L., Pilkington, R., Lee, B-H., & Weeden, P. (2007). EcoWiki-Evaluating collaborative and constructive learning with wikis, Final Report, University of Birmingham. Retrieved from http://portal.cetadl.bham.ac.uk/msprojects/Lists/Publication%20Library/DispForm. aspx?ID=19
21. Ozogul, G., Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2008). Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by pre-service teachers. Education Technology Research and Development, 56, 181-201.
22. Pombo, L., Loureiro, M.J., Balula, A., & Moreira, A. (2008). Teaching and evaluation strategies in online contexts-The case study of educational software evaluation. Paper presented at the International Conference Teaching and Learning, Aveiro.
23. Pombo, L., Loureiro, M.J., Balula, A., & Moreira, A. (2009). Diversity of strategies to promote effective b-learning: A case study in higher education. In Ulrich Bernath, András Szücs, Alan Tait and Martine Vidal (Eds.), Distance and e-learning in transition-Learning innovation, technology and social challenges (pp. 627-644). New York: ISTE & John Wiley & Sons.
24. Stacey, E., & Fountain, W. (2001). Student and supervisor perspectives in a computer-mediated research relationship. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 519-528). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.
25. Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. Paper presented at the 4th international conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
26. Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 135-147.
27. Vygostky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493-516.