Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: An exploratory study

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1325-1336

  Denis, Bernard ^a,b   Sauleau, Erik André ^c   Gendre, Isabelle ^b   Piette, Christine ^d   Bretagne, Jean Franois ^d,e   Perrin, Philippe ^b  

^a Pasteur Hospital   (France)

^b ADECA Alsace   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d ADECI 35   (France)

^e PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN NUMBER OF ADENOMA; MEAN NUMBER OF POLYP; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; POLYP DETECTION RATE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FRANCE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79959600764     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.038     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. R.E. Van Gelder, C.Y. Nio, and J. Florie Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 127 2004 41 48 (Pubitemid 38962272)
2. M. Bretthauer, E. Skovlund, and T. Grotmol Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer Scand J Gastroenterol 12 2003 1268 1274 (Pubitemid 38096086)
3. W. Atkin, P. Rogers, and C. Cardwell Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy Gastroenterology 126 2004 1247 1256 (Pubitemid 38552789)
4. P.F. Pinsky, R.E. Schoen, and J.L. Weissfeld Variability in flexible sigmoidoscopy performance among examiners in a screening trial Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 2005 792 797 (Pubitemid 41116732)
5. W. Sanchez, G.C. Harewood, and B.T. Petersen Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1941 1945 (Pubitemid 39421236)
6. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, and A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
7. D.T. Simmons, G.C. Harewood, and T.H. Baron Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 2006 965 971 (Pubitemid 44326377)
8. S.C. Chen, and D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861 (Pubitemid 46496608)
9. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, and B.E. Juliar Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
10. A. Shaukat, C. Oancea, and J.H. Bond Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 2009 1335 1340
11. S.L. Peters, A.G. Hasan, and N.B. Jacobson Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 2010 439 442
12. O.S. Lin, R.A. Kozarek, and A. Arai The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 1253 1259
13. J.F. Bretagne, S. Hamonic, and C. Piette Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 335 341
14. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, and S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
15. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, and T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S16 S28
16. J.F. Bretagne, and T. Ponchon Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy 40 2008 523 528 (Pubitemid 351911845)
17. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, and E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
18. B. Denis, A.M. Weiss, and A. Peter Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28 2004 1245 1255 (Pubitemid 40070050)
19. D.G. Hewett, and D.K. Rex Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1925 1933
20. J.E. Williams, T.D. Le, and D.O. Faigel Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 498 506
21. N.N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, and S.S. Forbes Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 140 2011 65 72
22. B. Denis, M. Ruetsch, and P. Strentz Short-term outcomes of the first round of a pilot colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac based faecal occult blood test Gut 56 2007 1579 1584 (Pubitemid 350033197)
23. M.F. Dixon Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited Gut 51 2002 130 131 (Pubitemid 34717758)
24. J. Cohen Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale (NJ)
25. J.C. Pinheiro, and D.M. Bates Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS 2000 Springer New York (NY)
26. G. Claeskens, and N.L. Hjort Model selection and model averaging 2008 Cambridge University Press Cambridge (UK)
27. D.F. Bauer Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics J Am Stat Assoc 67 1972 687 690
28. M. Hollander, and D.A. Wolfe Nonparametric statistical methods 1973 John Wiley & Sons New York (NY) 115 120
29. W.J. Conover, M.E. Johnson, and M.M. Johnson A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data Technometrics 23 1981 351 361 (Pubitemid 12456651)
30. R.J. Hilsden, A. Rostom, and C. Dube Is polyp detection rate a valid proxy for adenoma detection rate for measuring the technical quality of colonoscopy? [abstract] Gastroenterology 138 2010 S-57
31. D.L. Francis, D.T. Rodriguez-Correa, and A. Buchner Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 493 497
32. M.S. Sawhney, M.S. Cury, and N. Neeman Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection Gastroenterology 135 2008 1892 1898
33. H.D. Appelman Should HGD or degree of villous changes in colon polyps be reported? CON: high-grade dysplasia and villous features should not be part of the routine diagnosis of colorectal adenomas Am J Gastroentrol 103 2008 1329 1331 (Pubitemid 351813944)
34. R.D. Odze Should HGD or degree of villous changes in colon polyps be reported? A balancing view: pathologist-clinician interaction is essential Am J Gastroentrol 103 2008 1331 1333
35. B. Denis, C. Peters, and C. Chapelain Diagnostic accuracy of community pathologists in the interpretation of colorectal polyps Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 2009 1153 1160
36. K. Glatz, B. Pritt, and D. Glatz A multinational, internet-based assessment of observer variability in the diagnosis of serrated colorectal polyps Am J Clin Pathol 127 2007 938 945
37. A.B. Farris, J. Misdraji, and A. Srivastava Sessile serrated adenoma: challenging discrimination from other serrated colonic polyps Am J Surg Pathol 32 2008 30 35
38. D.K. Rex Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps Gastroenterology 136 2009 1174 1181
39. A. Ignjatovic, J.E. East, and N. Suzuki Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 10 2009 1171 1178
40. C. Hassan, P.J. Pickhardt, and D.K. Rex A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 2010 865 869
41. B. Denis, J. Bottlaender, and A.M. Weiss Some diminutive colorectal polyps can be removed and discarded without pathological examination Endoscopy 43 2011 81 86
42. P. Chatrenet, C. Milan, and P. Arveux Colorectal hyperplasic polyps in the population of Cte-d'Or, between 1976 and 1985 [in French] Bull Cancer 78 1991 229 235
43. J.H. Bond Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology Am J Gastroenterol 95 2000 3053 3063
44. D. Klling, A.D. Christ, and N. Karaaslan Is histological investigation of polyps always necessary? Endoscopy 33 2001 428 432 (Pubitemid 32586449)
45. S. Manfredi, C. Piette, and G. Durand Colonoscopy results of a French regional FOBT-based colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance Endoscopy 40 2008 422 427 (Pubitemid 351696381)
46. D.K. Rex, A.J. Overhiser, and S.C. Chen Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 149 153
47. J.T. Hetzel, C.S. Huang, and J.A. Coukos Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2656 2664
48. M. Colonna, P. Grosclaude, and J. Faivre Cancer registry data based estimation of regional cancer incidence: application to breast and colorectal cancer in French administrative regions J Epidemiol Community Health 53 1999 558 564 (Pubitemid 29401831)