A balancing view: Pathologist-clinician interaction is essential

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1331-1333

  Odze, Robert ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; DYSPLASIA; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; VILLOUS ADENOMA;

ADENOMA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 44949207270     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02005_4.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (4)

1. Winawer S, Zuaber A, Fletcher R, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1872-85.
2. Morson B, Dawson I, Day D, et al. Benign epithelial tumours and polyps. In: Morson & Dawson's gastrointestinal pathology, 3rd Ed. London, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1989:567.
3. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251-7700.
4. O'Brien M, Winawer S, Graham Zauber A, et al. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990;98:371-9.