Sequential transformations to access polycyclic chemotypes: Asymmetric crotylation and metal carbenoid reactions

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 50, Issue 26, 2011, Pages 5938-5942

  Wu, Jie ^a   Becerril, Jorge ^a   Lian, Yajing ^b   Davies, Huw M L ^b   Porco Jr , John A ^a   Panek, James S ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

carbenoids; cyclization; diastereoselectivity; diversity oriented synthesis; sequential transformations

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC CROTYLATION; CARBENOID REACTION; CARBENOIDS; CHEMOTYPES; DIASTEREO-SELECTIVITY; DIVERSITY-ORIENTED SYNTHESIS; HECK CYCLIZATION; PENTACYCLES; PHOTOCYCLOADDITION; POLYCYCLES; SEQUENTIAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

FUNCTIONAL GROUPS;

CYCLIZATION;

BICYCLO COMPOUND; CARBENE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; METAL; METHANE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CYCLIZATION; STEREOISOMERISM;

BICYCLO COMPOUNDS; CATALYSIS; CYCLIZATION; METALS; METHANE; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 79959200320     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201101366     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. For select recent examples of sequential transformations, see
2. X. Gao, D. G. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9308-9309
3. M. B. Boxer, H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2762-2763
4. Y. Nishihara, M. Miyasaka, M. Okamoto, H. Takahashi, E. Inoue, K. Tanemura, K. Takagi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12634-12635
5. P. Jiao, M. Kawasaki, H. Yamamoto, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 3383-3386
6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3333-3336
7. E. Yoshioka, S. Kohtani, H. Miyabe, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1956-1959.
8. For select examples, see
9. J. H. Rigby, N. C. Warshakoon, M. J. Heeg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6094-6095
10. N. Chatani, K. Kataoka, S. Murai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9104-9105
11. L. Deng, A. J. Giessert, O. O. Gerlitz, X. Dai, S. T. Diver, H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1342-1343
12. N. A. Miller, A. C. Willis, M. N. Paddon-Row, M. S. Sherburn, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 955-958
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 937-940.
14. J. S. Panek, M. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6594-6600
15. J. S. Panek, M. Yang, F. Xu, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5790-5792
16. R. T. Beresis, J. S. Solomon, M. G. Yang, N. F. Jain, J. S. Panek, Org. Synth. 1997, 75, 78
17. J. Wu, Y. Chen, J. S. Panek, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2112-2115
18. J. Wu, J. S. Panek, Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 6301-6304
19. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6165-6168.
20. S. Kesavan, Q. Su, J. Shao, J. A. Porco, Jr., J. S. Panek, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4435-4438
21. Y. Chen, J. A. Porco, Jr., J. S. Panek, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1529-1532
22. S. Kesavan, J. S. Panek, J. A. Porco, Jr., Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5203-5206
23. Y. Zhang, J. S. Panek, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3366-3369.
24. H. M. L. Davies, P. R. Bruzinski, D. H. Lake, N. Kong, M. J. Fall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6897-6907
25. H. M. L. Davies, N. Kong, M. R. Churchill, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6586-6589
26. S. J. Hedley, D. L. Ventura, P. M. Dominiak, C. L. Nygren, H. M. L. Davies, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5349-5356
27. Y. Lian, H. M. L. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 440-441.
28. For the "build/couple/pair" strategy, see:, T. E. Nielsen, S. L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 52-61
29. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 48-56.
30. For select reviews and seminal papers on diversity-oriented synthesis, see
31. S. L. Schreiber, Science 2000, 287, 1964-1969
32. G. L. Thomas, E. E. Wyatt, D. R. Spring, Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2006, 9, 700-712
33. K. Grabowski, K. H. Baringhaus, G. Schneider, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 892-904
34. W. R. Galloway, A. Bender, M. Welch, D. R. Spring, Chem. Commun. 2009, 2446-2462
35. J. D. Sunderhaus, S. F. Stephen, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1300-1308
36. P. Mukherjee, S. S. Roy, T. K. Sarkar, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2472-2475
37. H. F. Sore, D. T. Blackwell, S. J. F. MacDonald, D. R. Spring, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2806-2809
38. J. Barjau, G. Schnakenburg, S. R. Waldvogel, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 1451-1455
39. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1415-1419.
40. E. A. Couladouros, A. T. Strongilos, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3829-3832
41. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3677-3680
42. N. Kumagai, G. Muncipinto, S. L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 3717-3720
43. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3635-3638
44. E. Comer, E. Rohan, L. Deng, J. A. Porco, Jr., Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2123-2126
45. A. Zhou, D. Rayabarapu, P. Hanson, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 531-534
46. D. Morton, S. Leach, C. Cordier, S. Warriner, A. Nelson, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 110-115
47. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 104-109.
48. A. Padwa, M. D. Weingarten, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 223-269
49. M. P. Doyle, M. Protopopova, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7919-7946
50. K. M. Lydon, M. A. Mckervey, Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis I-III 1999, 2, 539-580
51. M. P. Doyle, Modern Rhodium-Catalyzed Organic Reactions 2005, 341-355
52. H. M. L. Davies, S. J. Hedley, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1109-1119
53. H. Pellissier, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7041-7095.
54. In a control reaction, a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers of 3c afforded product 4c as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers.
55. See the Supporting Information for complete mechanistic and conformational analyses and NOE measurements.
56. X-ray crystal structure analysis was carried out on DMAP salt derivative 6a and acid derivative 7a and 10a. CCDC 808910 (5a), CCDC 809096 (diastereomer of 5a), CCDC 809097 (diastereomer of 5c), CCDC 809098 (6a), CCDC 809099 (7a), CCDC 809100 (8b), and CCDC 809101 (10a) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via.
57. A possible mechanism for the partial racemization is provided in the Supporting Information.
58. The relative stereochemistry of compound 11 was tentatively assigned based on analogy to compound 12. All efforts to grow suitable crystals of compound 11 have been unsuccessful thus far.
59. M. T. Crimmins, Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1453-1473.
60. S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3981-3989
61. K. Inanaga, K. Takasu, M. Ihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3668-3669.
62. 2, MeCN, MeOH, acetone, and THF (tetrahydrofuran), all of which resulted in sluggish reactions or significant decomposition.
63. Attempts to prepare enantioenriched 2d were unsuccessful because of racemization of the allylic ether under the crotylation reaction conditions.
64. A structural-similarity search of the framework 13 at ¥90% threshold showed no hits. Structural similarity is measured using the Tanimoto equation and the PubChem. dictionary-based binary fingerprint (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/).
65. (+)-Nodulisporic Acid F
66. A. B. Smith III, A. H. Davulcu, L. Kürti, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1665-1668; JBIR-03
67. M. Ogata, J. Ueda, M. Hoshi, J. Hashimoto, T. Nakashima, K. Anzai, M. Takagi, K. Shin-ya, J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 645-648; asporyzin C
68. M. Qiao, N. Ji, X. Liu, K. Li, Q. Zhu, Q. Xue, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5677-5680.