Refractive surgery and the glaucoma patient

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 215-221

  Shrivastava, Anurag ^a,b   Madu, Assumpta ^a   Schultz, Jeffrey ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

cornea; glaucoma; laser assisted in situ keratomileusis; ocular hypertension; photorefractive keratectomy; pressure induced intralamellar stromal keratitis; refractive surgery; steroid response

Indexed keywords

STEROID;

CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CORNEA SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KERATITIS; KERATOMILEUSIS; LONG TERM CARE; NONHUMAN; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OPTIC NERVE FIBER; OPTIC NERVE LESION; PERIMETRY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; TONOMETRY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REFRACTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 79959187197     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: 15317021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283477c73     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Hoyt WF, Frisen L, Newman NM. Fundoscopy of nerve fiber layer defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol 1973; 12:814-829.
2. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, Wang JJ. The Blue Mountain Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:2010-2015.
3. Xu L, Wang Y, Wang S, et al. High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility: The Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:216-220. (Pubitemid 46161786)
4. Perkins ES, Phelps CD. Open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, low-tension glaucoma and refraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100:1464-1467. (Pubitemid 12055533)
5. Farrar SM, Shields MB, Miller KN, Stoup CM. Risk factors for the development and severity of glaucoma in the pigment dispersion syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108:223-229. (Pubitemid 19228957)
6. Niyadurupola N, Broadway DC. Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma: a major review. Clin Exper Ophthalmol 2008; 36:868-882.
7. Tripathi RC, Parapuram SK, Tripathi BJ, et al. Corticosteroids and glaucoma risk. Drugs Aging 1999; 15:439-450. (Pubitemid 30025747)
8. Podos SM, Becker B, Morton WR. High myopia and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 62:1038-1043.
9. Spaeth GL. Traumatic hyphaema, angle recession, dexamethasone hypertension, and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1967; 78:714-721.
10. Kersey JP, Broadway DC. Corticosteroid-induced glaucoma: a review of the literature. Eye 2006; 20:407-416.
11. Samuelson, TW. Refractive surgery in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15:112-118. (Pubitemid 38457130)
12. Conway ML, Wevill M, Benavente-Perez A, Hosking SL. Ocular blood-flow hemodynamics before and after application of a laser in situ keratomileusis ring. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:268-272.
13. Ozdamar A, Ocakoglu O. Optic nerve head blood flow using scanning laser Doppler flowmetry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2003; 19:433-437. (Pubitemid 36890563)
14. Agrawal PK. The effect of experimental ischaemia on the retinal vessels in the rat. Oriental Arch Ophthalmol 1965; 3:184-188.
15. Dollery CT, Henkind P, Kohner EM, et al. Effect of raised intraocular pressure on the retinal and choroidal circulation. Invest Ophthalmol 1968; 7:191-198.
16. Kirwan C, OKeefe M. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Refract Surg 2008; 24:366-370. (Pubitemid 351544003)
17. Ryan DS, Coe CD, Howard RS, et al. Corneal biomechanics following Epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg 2011:1-7.
18. Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, et al. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:1774-1788.
19. Liu L, Lei C, Li X, Dong J. Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2006; 26:372-373; 377.
20. Duba I, Wirthlin AC. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocularpressure measurements. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2004; 221:347-350. (Pubitemid 38807951)
21. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:746-751. (Pubitemid 38501466)
22. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143:39-47.
23. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44:3790-3794. (Pubitemid 37047947)
24. Belin MW, Hannush SB, YauCW, Schultze RL. Elevated intraocular pressureinduced interlamellar stromal keratitis. Ophthalmology 2002; 109:1929-1933.
25. Galal A, Artola A, Belda J, et al. Interface corneal edema secondary to steroidinduced elevation of intraocular pressure simulating diffuse lamellar keratitis. J Refract Surg 2006; 22:441-447. (Pubitemid 43736470)
26. Moya Calleja T, Iribarne Ferrer Y, Sanz Jorge A, SedóFernandez S. Steroidinduced interface fluid syndrome after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2009; 25:235-239.
27. Frucht-Pery J, Landau D, Raiskup F, et al. Early transient visual acuity loss after LASIK due to steroid-induced elevation of intraocular pressure. J Refract Surg 2007; 23:244-251. (Pubitemid 46452468)
28. Shaikh NM, Shaikh S, Singh K, Manche E. Progression to end-stage glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:356-359. (Pubitemid 34132493)
29. Xu L, Li Y, Wang S, et al. Characteristics of highly myopic eyes: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:121-126. (Pubitemid 46014285)
30. Garzozi HJ, Chung HS, Lang Y, et al. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers. Cornea 2001; 20:33-36. (Pubitemid 32038152)
31. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M, et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:2154-2160. (Pubitemid 30194239)
32. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123:767-772. (Pubitemid 27250923)
33. Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landao D, et al. Intraocular pressure after LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology 2002; 109:1659-1661. (Pubitemid 35006397)
34. Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, et al. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010. [Epub ahead of print].
35. Lam AK, Wu R, Wang Z, et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:631-636.
36. Vakili R, Choudhri SA, Tauber S, Shields MB. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer. J Glaucoma 2002; 11:493-496. (Pubitemid 36015107)
37. West CE, Capella JA, Kaufman HE. Measurement of intraocular pressure with a pneumatic applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1972; 74:505-509.
38. Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005; 15:81-88. (Pubitemid 40462734)
39. Abbasoglu OE, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105:2193-2196. (Pubitemid 30191658)
40. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
41. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology 2010; 117:730-737.
42. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52 (Suppl 2):S109-S114. (Pubitemid 350060960)
43. Morita T, Shoji N, Kamiya K, et al. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 248:607.
44. Gyatsho J, Kaushik S, Gupta A, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous Indian eyes: an optical coherence tomography study. J Glaucoma 2008; 17:122-127. (Pubitemid 351412401)
45. Katsanos A, Kóthy P, Nagy ZZ, Holló G. Scanning laser polarimetry of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): stability of the values after the third post-LASIK month. Acta Physiol Hung 2004; 91:119-130. (Pubitemid 39145532)
46. Sharma N, Sony P, Gupta A, Vajpayee RB. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:446-455.
47. Whitson JT, McCulley JP, Cavanagh HD, et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on optic nerve head topography and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:2302-2305. (Pubitemid 38049727)
48. Zangwill LM, Abunto T, Bowd C, et al. Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:200-207. (Pubitemid 40202552)
49. Hamada N, Kaiya T, Oshika T, et al. Optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis with scanning laser tomography after LASIK. J Refract Surg 2006; 22:372-375.
50. Kook MS, Lee S, Tchah H, et al. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by scanning laser polarimetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:670-675. (Pubitemid 34286788)
51. Holló G, Nagy ZZ, Vargha P, et al. Influence of post-LASIK corneal healing on scanning laser polarimetric measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:627-631. (Pubitemid 34627951)
52. Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Paschalis EI, et al. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer measurements, after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis, using scanning laser polarimetry (GDX VCC). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248:731-736.
53. Dada T, Chaudhary S, Muralidhar R, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement following laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser polarimetry. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007; 55:191-194.
54. Austin MW, Sreekantam S, Martin S, Hill RJ. Bilateral ring scotomas following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:1062-1064. (Pubitemid 43928463)
55. Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59 (Suppl):S53-S58.
56. Hsu SY, Chang MS, Lee CJ. Intraocular pressure assessment in both eyes of the same patient after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:76-82.
57. Paciuc M, Velasco CF, Naranjo R. Acute angle-closure glaucoma after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:620-623. (Pubitemid 30213266)
58. Lyle WA, Jin GJ. Interface fluid associated with diffuse lamellar keratitis and epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25:1009-1012. (Pubitemid 29309803)
59. Najman-Vainer J, Smith RJ, Maloney RK. Interface fluid after LASIK: misleading tonometry can lead to end-stage glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:471-472. (Pubitemid 30212937)
60. Hamilton DR, Manche EE, Rich LF, Maloney RK. Steroid-induced glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with interface fluid. Ophthalmology 2002; 109:659-665. (Pubitemid 34270121)
61. Clark AF. Steroids, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1995; 4:354-369.
62. Mitchell P, Cumming RG, Mackey DA. Inhaled corticosteroids, family history, and risk of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:2301-2306. (Pubitemid 30191442)
63. Kasetsuwan N, Pangilinan RT, Moreira LL, et al. Real time intraocular pressure and lamellar corneal flap thickness in keratomileusis. Cornea 2001; 20:41-44. (Pubitemid 32040941)
64. Sachs HG, Lohmann CP, Op de Laak JP. Intraocular pressure in sections with microkeratomes in vitro. Ophthalmologe 1997; 94:707-709. (Pubitemid 27465800)
65. Chaurasia SS, Luengo Gimeno F, Tan K, et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51:4641-4645.
66. Hernández-Verdejo JL, de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA. Comparison of real-time intraocular pressure during laser in situ keratomileusis and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis in porcine eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:477-482.
67. Bradley JC, McCartney DL, Craenen GA. Continuous intraocular pressure recordings during lamellar microkeratotomy of enucleated human eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:869-872. (Pubitemid 46656453)
68. Maden A, Yilmaz S, Yurdakul NS. Nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy after LASIK with femtosecond laser flap creation. J Neuroophthalmol 2008; 28: 242-243.
69. Montezuma SR, Lessell S, Pineda R. Optic neuropathy after epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg 2008; 24:204-208. (Pubitemid 351252326)
70. Hayreh SS, Weingeist TA. Experimental occlusion of the central artery of the retina. I. Ophthalmoscopic and fluorescein fundus angiographic studies. Br J Ophthalmol 1980; 64:896-912. (Pubitemid 11217299)
71. Mirshahi A, Baatz H. Posterior segment complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Surv Ophthalmol 2009; 54:433-440.
72. Osman ET, Al Turki T, AlSaleh A, et al. Bilateral acute angle closure glaucoma after hyperopic LASIK correction. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2009; 23:215-217.
73. Jabbur NS, Tuli S, Barequet IS, OBrien TP. Outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:110-114. (Pubitemid 38234339)
74. Jewelewicz DA, Radcliffe NM, Liebmann J, Ritch R. Temporal evolution of intraocular pressure elevation after pupillary dilation in pigment dispersion syndrome. J Glaucoma 2009; 18:184-185.
75. Gürses-Ozden R, Liebmann JM, Schuffner D, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness remains unchanged following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132:512-516. (Pubitemid 32904573)
76. Piette S, Liebmann JM, Ishikawa H, et al. Acute conformational changes in the optic nerve head with rapid intraocular pressure elevation: implications for LASIK surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003; 34:334-341. (Pubitemid 36869632)
77. Nevyas JY, Nevyas HJ, Nevyas-Wallace A. Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:2123-2128. (Pubitemid 36026088)