In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 4641-4645

  Chaurasia, Shyam S ^a   Gimeno, Federico Luengo ^a   Tan, Kim ^a   Yu, Shangjuan ^a   Tan, Donald T ^a,b,c   Beuerman, Roger W ^a,c,d   Mehta, Jodhbir S ^a,b,e  

^a SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d Duke NUS   (Singapore)

^e DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TISSUE FLAP; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA LIMBUS; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; METHODOLOGY; NEEDLE; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; RABBIT;

ANIMALS; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; FEMALE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEEDLES; RABBITS; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 77957356233     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5228     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sakimoto T, Rosenblatt MI, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors. Lancet. 2006;367:1432-1447.
2. O'Doherty M, O'Keeffe M, Kelleher C. Five-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:20-23.
3. Solomon KD, Fernandez de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, et al. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:691-701.
4. Slade SG. The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization ofcorneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:314-317.
5. Netto MV, Mohan RR, Medeiros FW, et al. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:667-676.
6. Soong HK, Malta JB. Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. Am JOphthalmol. 2009;147:189-197.
7. Hammond MD, Madigan WP Jr, Bower KS. Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 200-2003. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 184-190.
8. Bailey MD, Zadnik K. Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDAapproved lasers. Cornea. 2007;26:246-254.
9. Stulting RD, Carr JD, Thompson KP, et al. Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis for the corrections of myopia. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:13-20.
10. Arevalo JF. Posterior segment complications after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:177-184.
11. Mirshahi A, Baatz H. Poster segment complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54:433-440.
12. Krueger RR, Seiler T, Gruchman T. Stress wave amplitudes during laser surgery of the cornea. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1070-1074.
13. Samuelson TW. Refractive surgery in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:112-118.
14. Bashford KP, Shafranov G, Tauber S, Shields MB. Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:245-251.
15. Flaxel CJ, Choi YH, Sheety M, Oeinck SC, Lee JY, McDonnell PJ. Proposed mechanism for retinal tears alters LASIK: an experimental model. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:24-27.
16. Chateris DG, Cooling RJ, Lavin MJ, McLeod D. Retinal detachment following excimer laser. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:759-761.
17. Hu J, Zeng J, Huang L, Qin B. Retinal detachment after laser in situkeratomileusis in myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:921-923.
18. Cameron BD, Saffra NA, Strominger MB. Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:660-665.
19. Arevalo JF, Mendoza AJ, Velez-Vazquez W, et al. Full-thicknessmacular hole after LASIK for the correction of myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112: 1207-1212.
20. Ruiz-Moreno JM, Perez-Santonja JJ, Alio JL. Choroidal neovascularization n myopic eyes after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Retina. 2001;21:115-120.
21. Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, et al. Accuracy of Goldmann, cular response analyzer, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in eratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1661-665.
22. Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Amariotakis GA, et al. The accuracy f continued clinical use of Goldmann applanation tonometers ith known calibration errors. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:9-13.
23. Hernandez-Verdejo J, Teus MA, Roman JM, Bolvar G. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:68-72.
24. Bissen-Miyajima H, Suzuki S, Ohashi Y, Minami K. Experimental observation of intraocular pressure changes during microkeratome globe suction in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:590-594.
25. Kasetsuwan N, Pangilinan RT, Moreira LL, et al. Real time intraocular pressure and lamellar corneal flap thickness in keratomileusis. Cornea. 2001;20:41-44.
26. Maden A, Yilmaz S, Yurdakul NS. Nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy after LASIK with femtosecond laser flap creation. J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 2008;28:242-243.
27. Bushley DM, Parmley VC, Paglen P. Visual field defect associated with laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129: 668-671.
28. Jue B, Maurice DM. The mechanical properties of the rabbit and human cornea. J Biomech. 1986;19:847-853.