Does gender have a role in ICT among finnish teachers and students?

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 325-340

  Ilomäki, Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Competencies; Gender; Generation; ICT

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958801163     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.576910     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alexander, P.A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D.Y. Dai & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Ching, C., Basham, J., & Jang, E. (2005). The legacy of the digital divide: Gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults. Urban Education, 40, 394-411.
3. Clegg, S. (2001). Theorising the machine: Gender, education and computing. Gender and Education, 13, 307-324.
4. Facer, K. (2002). What do we mean by the digital divide? Exploring the roles of access, relevance and resource networks, A collection of papers from the Toshiba/Becta Seminar 19th February, 2002. Retrieved June 29, 2005, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/research.cfm?section=1&id=529
5. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: Children and computing in the home. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Facer, K., Sutherland, R., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2001). What's the point of using computers? The development of computer expertise in the home. New Media & Society, 3, 199-219.
7. Gansmo, H., Lagesen, V., & Sørensen, K. (2003). Out of the boy's room? A critical analysis of the understanding of gender and ICT in Norway. NORA, 11, 130-139.
8. Hakkarainen, K., Ilomäki, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., Tuominen, T., Lehtinen, E. (2000). Students' skills and practices of using ICT: Results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers & Education, 34, 103-117.
9. Hakkarainen, K., Järvelä, S., Lipponen, L., & Lehtinen, E. (1998). Culture of collaboration in computer- supported learning: Finnish perspectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9, 271-288.
10. Hakkarainen, K., Muukkonen, H., Lipponen, L., Ilomäki, L., Rahikainen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001). Teachers' information and communication technology (ICT) skills and practices of using ICT and their pedagogical thinking. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 181-197.
11. Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2003). Patterns of female and male students' participation in peer interaction in computer-supported learning. Computers & Education, 40, 327-342.
12. Ilomäki, L., & Rantanen, P. (2007). Intensive use of information and communication technology (ICT) in lower secondary school: Development of student expertise. Computers & Education, 48, 119-136.
13. Ilomäki, L., Tapola, A., Hakkarainen, K., Koivisto, J., Lakkala, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2001). Opettajien tieto- ja viestintätekniikan osaaminen ja käyttö sekä pedagoginen soveltaminen: Vertailututkimus helsinkiläisten opettajien käsityksistä vuosina 1997 ja 1999, [Teachers' ICT competence and pedagogical application: A comparative study on teachers' concepts in 1997 and 1999.] Helsingin kaupungin opetusviraston julkaisusarja A3:2001.
14. Jenson, J., & Brushwood Rose, C. (2003). Women@Work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers' talk about new technologies. Gender & Education, 15, 169-181.
15. Keskinen, V. (2001). Kiirettä pitää: Kaverit, koti, koulu ja nuorten vapaa-aika Helsingissä 2000, [In a hurry: Friends, home, school, and the leisure time of young people in Helsinki.] Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus. Tutkimuksia 2001:10.
16. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of new technologies on teachers and students. Education and Information Technologies, 7, 369-376.
17. Krapp, A., & Lewalter, D. (2001). Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations: A longitudinal study in vocational school and work settings. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 209-232). London: Pergamon/Elsevier.
18. Lehtinen, E., Sinko, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). ICT in Finnish education: How to scale up best practices. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research and Practice, 2, 77-89.
19. Lewin, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Harrison, C., Hawe, K., Lunzer, E., et al. (2004). The UK ImpaCT2 Project. Education, Communication & Information, 4, 336-340.
20. Melkas, T. (2004). Leisure uses of ICTs among persons aged 15-34. In J. Nurmela, T. Melkas, T. Sirkiä, M. Ylitalo, & L. Mustonen (Eds.), Finnish people's communication capabilities in interactive society of the 2000s (pp. 33-45). Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
21. Mieg, H.A. (2001). The social psychology of expertise: Case studies in research, professional domains, and expert roles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Ministry of Education. (1999). Education, training and research in the information society: A national strategy 2000-2004. Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://www.minedu.fi/julkaisut/ information/englishU/index.html
23. Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., Hakkarainen, K., Lakkala, M., Lipponen, L., Ilomälo, L., & Lehtinen, E. (1999). Oppilaiden tietotekninen osaaminen sekä oppimis- ja tietokäsitykset: Yläasteen ja lukion oppilaat, [Students' ICT comptence and their concepts about learning and knowledge: Students in lower and upper secondary schools.] Helsingin kaupungin opetusviraston julkaisuja A4:1999.
24. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide? Civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet in democratic societies. New York: Cambridge Press.
25. Nurmela, J. (1998). Valikoiko uusi tieto- ja viestintätekniikka käyttäjänsä?, [Does the new information and communication technology choose its users?]. Statistics Finland, Reviews 1998:1. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus.
26. Nurmela, J., Heinonen, R., Ollila, P., & Virtanen, V. (2000). Mobile phones and computers as parts of everyday life in Finland, Statistics Finland, Reviews 2000:5. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus.
27. Nurmela, J., & Ylitalo, M. (2003). Tietoyhteiskunnan kehkeytyminen. Suomalaisten tietoyhteiskunavalmiuksien ja: Asenteiden muutokset 1996-2002, [The emergence of the knowledge society: Changes in the readiness and attitudes of Finnish people 1996-2002.]. Katsauksia 2003/3. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus.
28. Perrons, D. (2002). Gendered divisions in the new economy: Risks and opportunities. GeoJournal, 56, 271-280.
29. Rahikainen, M., Ilomäki, L., Hakkarainen, K., Lehtinen, E., Lipponen, L., & Muukkonen, H. (2001). Peruskoulun ja lukion oppilaiden käsityksiä tietotekniikasta ja oppimisesta. Vuosien 1998 ja 2000 aineistojen vertailu. [The concepts of lower and upper secondary students about information technology and learning: A comparison of the data in 1998 and 2000]. Helsingin kaupunki, Opetusvirasto, Mediakeskus. Työpapereita 1:2001.
30. Shade, L.R. (1998). A gendered perspective on access to the information infrastructure. Information Society, 4, 33-44.
31. Shuchat Shaw, F., & Giacquinta, J. (2000). A survey of graduate students as end users of computertechnology: New roles for faculty. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18, 21-40.
32. Sirkiä, T., Muttilainen, V., Kangassalo, P., & Nurmela, J. (2005). Suomalaisten viestintävalmiudet 2000-luvun vuorovaikutusyhteiskunnassa. Osa 2. [Finnish people's communication capabilities in the interactive society of the 2000s. Part 2.]. Katsauksia 2005/2. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
33. Stein, E.W. (1997). A look at expertise from a social perspective. In P.J. Feltovich, K.M. Ford, & R.R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 181-194). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
34. Stepulevage, L. (2001). Gender/technology relations: Complicating the gender binary. Gender and Education, 13, 325-338.
35. Sølvberg, A. (2002). Gender differences in computer-related control beliefs and home computer use. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 408-426.
36. van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Information Society, 19, 315-326.
37. Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2004). New technologies, new differences: Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45, 35-55.
38. Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7(7). Retrieved April 10, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/index.html