Crashworthiness design of vehicle by using multiobjective robust optimization

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 99-110

  Sun, Guangyong ^a,b   Li, Guangyao ^a   Zhou, Shiwei ^b   Li, Hongzhou ^a   Hou, Shujuan ^a   Li, Qing ^b  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crashworthiness; Dual response surface method; Multicriteria; Multiobjective robust optimization; Particle swarm optimization

Indexed keywords

BASELINE DESIGN; DESIGN OBJECTIVES; DESIGN VARIABLES; DETERMINISTIC OPTIMIZATION; DUAL-RESPONSE; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTI-CRITERIA; PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES; PARETO SOLUTION; PARTICLE SWARM; PASSENGER SAFETY; ROBUST DESIGNS; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; STRUCTURAL WEIGHT; WEIGHTING FACTORS;

ABSORPTION; CRASHWORTHINESS; DESIGN; ENERGY ABSORPTION; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 79958136883     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0601-z     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. M Avalle G Chiandussi G Belingardi 2002 Design optimization by response surface methodology: application to crashworthiness design of vehicle structures Struct Multidisc Optim 24 4 325 332 10.1007/s00158-002-0243-x (Pubitemid 35354496)
2. KJ Craig N Stander DA Dooge S Varadappa 2005 Automotive crashworthiness design using response surface-based variable screening and optimization Eng Comput 22 1-2 38 61 1191.74041 (Pubitemid 40242579)
3. I Doltsinis Z Kang 2004 Robust design of structures using optimization methods Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193 23-26 2221 2237 1067.74554 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.055 (Pubitemid 38503355)
4. L Doltsinis Z Kang GD Cheng 2005 Robust design of non-linear structures using optimization methods Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194 12-16 1779 1795 1083.74041 10.1016/j.cma.2004.02.027 (Pubitemid 40262952)
5. F Duddeck 2008 Multidisciplinary optimization of car bodies Struct Multidisc Optim 35 4 375 389 10.1007/s00158-007-0130-6 (Pubitemid 351334012)
6. H Fang M Rais-Rohani Z Liu MF Horstemeyer 2005 A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization Comput Struct 83 25-26 2121 2136 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.025 (Pubitemid 41084679)
7. J Forsberg L Nilsson 2006 Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization Int J Impact Eng 32 5 759 777 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.007 (Pubitemid 41802210)
8. L Gu RJ Yang CH Tho M Makowski O Faruque Y Li 2001 Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact Int J Veh Des 26 4 348 360 10.1504/IJVD.2001.005210 (Pubitemid 34082530)
9. S Gunawan S Azarm 2005 Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept Struct Multidisc Optim 29 1 50 60 10.1007/s00158-004-0450-8 (Pubitemid 40963326)
10. SJ Hou Q Li SY Long XJ Yanga W Li 2008 Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design Int J Impact Eng 35 11 1355 1367 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.003
11. T Jansson L Nilsson M Redhe 2003 Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization-with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming Struct Multidisc Optim 25 2 129 140 10.1007/s00158-002- 0279-y
12. KC Kapur BR Cho 1996 Economic design of the specification region for multiple quality characteristics IIE Trans 28 3 237 248 10.1080/ 07408179608966270 (Pubitemid 126759984)
13. KJ Kim DKJ Lin 1998 Dual response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach J Qual Technol 30 1 1 10 (Pubitemid 128594792)
14. PN Koch RJ Yang L Gu 2004 Design for six sigma through robust optimization Struct Multidisc Optim 26 3-4 235 248 10.1007/s00158-003-0337-0
15. O Koksoy 2006 Multiresponse robust design: mean square error (MSE) criterion Appl Math Comput 175 2 1716 1729 2225619 10.1016/j.amc.2005.09.016
16. O Koksoy 2008 A nonlinear programming solution to robust multi-response quality problem Appl Math Comput 196 2 603 612 2388716 10.1016/j.amc.2007.06.023 (Pubitemid 351174322)
17. O Koksoy T Yalcinoz 2006 Mean square error criteria to multiresponse process optimization by a new genetic algorithm Appl Math Comput 175 2 1657 1674 10.1016/j.amc.2005.09.011
18. J Kovach BR Cho J Antony 2008 Development of an experiment-based robust design paradigm for multiple quality characteristics using physical programming Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35 11-12 1100 1112 10.1007/s00170-006-0792-z
19. H Kurtaran A Eskandarian D Marzougui NE Bedewi 2002 Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations Comput Mech 29 4-5 409 421 1146.74348 10.1007/s00466-002-0351-x (Pubitemid 35422280)
20. XT Liao Q Li XJ Yang W Li WG Zhang 2008 A two-stage multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness under front impact Int J Crashworthiness 13 3 279 288 10.1080/13588260801933659
21. XT Liao Q Li XJ Yang WG Zhang W Li 2008 Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model Struct Multidisc Optim 35 6 561 569 10.1007/s00158-007-0163-x
22. DKJ Lin WZ Tu 1995 Dual response-surface optimization J Qual Technol 27 1 34 39
23. DS Liu KC Tan CK Goh WK Ho 2007 A multiobjective memetic algorithm based on particle swarm optimization IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 37 1 42 50 10.1109/TSMCB.2006.883270 (Pubitemid 46358478)
24. LS-DYNA (2003) Keyword user's manual, v. 970. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
25. PO Marklund L Nilsson 2001 Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact Struct Multidisc Optim 21 5 383 392 10.1007/s001580100117 (Pubitemid 32694087)
26. Raquel C, Naval P (2005) An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. Washington DC, USA
27. M Redhe J Forsberg T Jansson PO Marklund L Nilsson 2002 Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems-an analysis of the surface approximation error versus the number of function evaluations Struct Multidisc Optim 24 3 185 194 10.1007/s00158-002-0228-9 (Pubitemid 35186125)
28. Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujii K (2005) A new efficient and useful robust optimization approach-design for multi-objective six sigma. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. Edinburgh
29. JN Siddall 1984 A new approach to probability in engineering design and optimization J Mech Transmissions Automation Des Trans ASME 106 1 5 10 10.1115/1.3258562 (Pubitemid 14546980)
30. GY Sun GY Li ZH Gong XY Cui XJ Yang Q Li 2010 Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming Mater Des 31 4 1917 1929 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.050
31. GY Sun GY Li SJ Hou SW Zhou W Li Q Li 2010 Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 527 7-8 1911 1919
32. GY Sun GY Li M Stone Q Li 2010 A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials Comput Mater Sci 49 3 500 511 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.041
33. GG Vining RH Myers 1990 Combining taguchi and response-surface philosophies-a dual response approach J Qual Technol 22 1 38 45
34. GG Wang S Shan 2007 Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization J Mech Des 129 4 370 380 2374999 10.1115/1.2429697 (Pubitemid 46736217)
35. RJ Yang A Akkerman DF Anderson OM Faruque L Gu 2000 Robustness optimization for vehicular crash simulations Comput Sci Eng 2 6 8 13 10.1109/5992.881701
36. RJ Yang N Wang CH Tho JP Bobineau 2005 Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation J Mech Des 127 5 1014 1020 10.1115/1.1906264 (Pubitemid 41250125)
37. TH Yang PH Chou 2005 Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method Math Comput Simul 68 1 9 21 1108.93305 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004 (Pubitemid 40146396)
38. TH Yang YY Kuo PH Chou 2005 Solving a multiresponse simulation problem using a dual-response system and scatter search method Simul Model Pract Theory 13 4 356 369 10.1016/j.simpat.2004.12.001 (Pubitemid 40612857)
39. O Yeniay R Unal RA Lepsch 2006 Using dual response surfaces to reduce variability in launch vehicle design: a case study Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 4 407 412 10.1016/j.ress.2005.02.007 (Pubitemid 43031342)
40. BD Youn KK Choi 2004 A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization Comput Struct 82 2-3 241 256 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.09.002
41. BD Youn KK Choi RJ Yang L Gu 2004 Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact Struct Multidisc Optim 26 3-4 272 283 10.1007/s00158-003-0345-0
42. C Zang MI Friswell JE Mottershead 2005 A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics Comput Struct 83 4-5 315 326 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.10.007 (Pubitemid 40072219)