Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization

International Journal of Impact Engineering

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 759-777

  Forsberg, J ^a   Nilsson, L ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Crashworthiness optimization; Kriging; LS DYNA; RSM

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; VEHICLES;

CRASHWORTHINESS OPTIMIZATION; KRIGING; LS-DYNA; RSM;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 29144466034     PISSN: 0734743X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. L.F.P. Etman, J.M.T.A. Adriaens, M.T.P. van Slagmaat, and A.J.G. Schoofs Crashworthiness design optimization using multipoint sequential linear programming Struct Opt 12 1996 222 228
2. Etman LFP. Optimization of multibody systems using approximations concepts. Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 1997.
3. P.-O. Marklund, and L. Nilsson Optimization of a car body component subjected to impact Struct Multidisc Opt 21 2001 383 392
4. T. Jansson, M. Redhe, and L. Nilsson Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization - with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming Struct Multidisc Opt 25 2003 129 140
5. Schramm U, Thomas H. Crashworthiness design using structural optimization. AIAA Paper No. 98-4729, 1998.
6. Schramm, U. Multi-disciplinary optimization for NHV and crashworthiness. In: Bathe KJ, editor. The first MIT conference on computational fluid and solid mechanics, Boston, Oxford: Elsevier; June 12-15, 2001. p. 721-4.
7. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Kodiyalam S, Yang R-J. Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crash. AIAA Paper No. 2000-1521, 2000.
8. K. Yamazaki, and J. Han Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of tubes Struct Opt 16 1998 37 46
9. Yang R-J, Gu L, Tho CH, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a full vehicle with high performance computing. AIAA Paper No. 2001-1273, 2001.
10. Giunta AA, Watson LT, Koehler J. A comparison of approximating modelling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models. Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis & optimization, St Louis, 1998. p. 392-404.
11. Gu L. A comparison of polynomial based regression models in vehicle safety analysis. In: Proceedings of ASME design engineering technical conferences, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2001.
12. R. Jin, W. Chen, and T.W. Simpson Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria Struct Multidisc Opt 23 2001
13. Simpson TW, Maurey TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F. Comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis & optimization, St Louis, 1998. p. 381-91.
14. Yang RJ, Wang N, Tho CH, Bobineau JP. Metamodelling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. In: Proceedings of ASME design engineering technical conferences, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2001.
15. Belytschko T, Welch RE, Bruce RW. Finite element analysis of automotive structures under crash loadings. Report DOT-HS-105-3-697. IIT Research Institute, Chicago, 1975. p. 37-46.
16. Benson DJ, Hallquist JO. The application of DYNA3D in large scale crashworthiness calculations. 1986 ASME international computers in engineering conference, Chicago, 1986.
17. du Bois P, Chedmail JF, Dagba B, Haug E, Pickett AK, Winkelmuller G. Numerical techniques, experimental validation and industrial applications of structural impact and crashworthiness analysis with supercomputers for the automotive industries. Supercomputer applications and automotive research and engineering development. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1986.
18. J. Nocedal, and S.J. Wright Numerical optimization 1999 Springer New York
19. J.A. Snyman A new and dynamic method for unconstrained minimization Appl Math Model 6 1982 449 462
20. J.A. Snyman An improved version of the original leap-frog dynamic method for unconstrained minimization LFOP1(b) Appl Math Model 7 1983 216 218
21. R.H. Myers, and D.C. Montgomery Response surface methodology 1995 Wiley New York
22. N.R. Draper, and H. Smith Applied regression analysis 1966 Wiley New York
23. M.L. Stein Interpolation of spatial data - some theory for kriging 1999 Springer New York
24. R.A. Olea Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists 1999 Luwer London
25. Rijpkema JJM, Etman LFP, Schoofs AJG. Metamodel based design optimization, including design sensitivities. Proceedings SMSMEO workshop. Denmark University of Technology, Lyngby, November 16-18, 2000.
26. R.S. Koshal Application of the method of maximum likelihood to the improvement of curve fitting by the method of moments J Roy Stat Soc Ser A 96 1933 303 313
27. Venter G, Haftka RT. Minimum-bias based experimental design for constructing response surfaces in structural optimization. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC, structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Kissimmee, 1997. p. 1225-38.
28. N. Stander LS-OPT user's manual v. 1 1999 Livermore Software Technology Company Livermore
29. Stander N, Burger M, Zhu X, Maker B. Springback compensation in sheet metal forming using successive response surface method. AIAA-2002-5539. In: Mistree F, editor. 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Atlanta, 2002.
30. J.O. Hallquist LS-DYNA theoretical manual 1998 Livermore Software Technology Company Livermore
31. J.O. Hallquist LS-DYNA user's manual v. 950 1999 Livermore Software Technology Company Livermore
32. Ho P. LS-PRE/POST user's manual v. 1. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Company; 2004.