Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1917-1929

  Sun, Guangyong ^a,b   Li, Guangyao ^a   Gong, Zhihui ^a   Cui, Xiangyang ^a   Yang, Xujing ^a   Li, Qing ^b  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drawbead design; Dual response surface method; Multicriteria; Multiobjective robust optimization; Particle swarm optimization; Sheet metal forming

Indexed keywords

DRAWBEAD; DRAWBEAD DESIGN; DUAL-RESPONSE; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI-CRITERIA; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION;

DESIGN; DRAWING (FORMING); METAL FORMING; METALS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; SHEET METAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

EID: 72749125780     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.050     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Makinouchi A. Sheet metal forming simulation in industry. J Mater Process Technol 60 1-4 (1996) 19-26
2. Panthi S.K., Ramakrishnan N., Pathak K.K., and Chouhan J.S. An analysis of springback in sheet metal bending using finite element method (FEM). J Mater Process Technol 186 1-3 (2007) 120-124
3. Dong H.Z., and Lin Z.Q. Investigation of sheet metal forming by numerical simulation and experiment. J Mater Process Technol 103 3 (2000) 404-410
4. Chen L., Yang J.C., Zhang L.W., and Yuan S.Y. Finite element simulation and model optimization of blankholder gap and shell element type in the stamping of a washing-trough. J Mater Process Technol 182 1-3 (2007) 637-643
5. Ohata T., Nakamura Y., Katayama T., Nakamachi E., and Nakano K. Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation. J Mater Process Technol 60 1-4 (1996) 543-548
6. Naceur H., Guo Y.Q., Batoz J.L., and Knopf-Lenoir C. Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43 10 (2001) 2407-2434
7. Azaouzi M., Naceur H., Delameziere A., Batoz J.L., and Belouettar S. An Heuristic optimization algorithm for the blank shape design of high precision metallic parts obtained by a particular stamping process. Finite Elem Anal Des 44 14 (2008) 842-850
8. Guo Y.Q., Batoz J.L., Naceur H., Bouabdallah S., Mercier F., and Barlet O. Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach. Comput Struct 78 (2000) 138-148
9. Liao X.T., Li Q., Yang X.J., Zhang W.G., and Li W. Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 35 6 (2008) 561-569
10. Chengzhi S., Guanlong C., and Zhongqin L. Determining the optimum variable blank-holder forces using adaptive response surface methodology (ARSM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26 1-2 (2005) 23-29
11. Naceur H., Ben-Elechi S., Batoz J.L., and Knopf-Lenoir C. Response surface methodology for the rapid design of aluminum sheet metal forming parameters. Mater Des 29 (2008) 781-790
12. Kok S., and Stander N. Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations. Struct Optim 18 4 (1999) 277-295
13. Kayabasi O., and Ekici B. Automated design methodology for automobile side panel die using an effective optimization approach. Mater Des 28 10 (2007) 2665-2672
14. Huang Y., Lo Z.Y., and Du R. Minimization of the thickness variation in multi-step sheet metal stamping. J Mater Process Technol 177 1-3 (2006) 84-86
15. Ohata T., Nakamura Y., Katayama T., and Nakamachi E. Development of optimum process design system for sheet fabrication using response surface method. J Mater Process Technol 143 Sp. Iss. SI (2003) 667-672
16. Hu W., Yao L.G., and Hua Z.Z. Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method. J Mater Process Technol 197 1-3 (2008) 77-88
17. Breitkopf P., Naceur H., Rassineux A., and Villon P. Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications. Comput Struct 83 17-18 (2005) 1411-1428
18. Jansson T., Andersson A., and Nilsson L. Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part - an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 159 3 (2005) 426-434
19. Jansson T., and Nilsson L. Optimizing sheet metal forming processes - using a design hierarchy and response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 178 1-3 (2006) 218-233
20. Tang B.T., Sun J.X., Zhao Z., Chen J., and Ruan X.Y. Optimization of drawbead design in sheet forming using one step finite element method coupled with response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31 3-4 (2006) 225-234
21. Jakumeit J., Herdy M., and Nitsche M. Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 29 6 (2005) 498-507
22. Mourelatos Z.P., and Liang J.H. A methodology for trading-off performance and robustness under uncertainty. J Mech Des 128 4 (2006) 856-863
23. Li YQ, Cui ZS, Ruan XY, Zhang DJ. Application of six sigma robust optimization in sheet metal forming. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming processes, Detroit (MI, USA); 2005.
24. Li Y.Q., Cui Z.S., Ruan X.Y., and Zhang D.J. CAE-based six sigma robust optimization for deep-drawing process of sheet metal. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30 7-8 (2006) 631-637
25. Li Y.Q., Cui Z.S., Zhang D.J., Ruan X.Y., and Chen J. Six sigma optimization in sheet metal forming based on dual response surface model Chinese. J Mech Eng (English Edition) 19 2 (2006) 251-255
26. Demir I., Kayabasi O., and Ekici B. Probabilistic design of sheet-metal die by finite element method. Mater Des 29 3 (2008) 721-727
27. Zhang D.J., Cui Z.S., Ruan X.Y., and Li Y.Q. Sheet springback prediction based on non-linear combined hardening rule and Barlat89's yielding function. Comput Mater Sci 38 2 (2006) 256-262
28. Wang H., Li E.Y., and Li G.Y. Optimization of drawbead design in sheet metal forming based on intelligent sampling by using response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 206 1-3 (2008) 45-55
29. Naceur H., Delameziere A., Batoz J.L., Guo Y.Q., and Knopf-Lenoir C. Some improvements on the optimum process design in deep drawing using the inverse approach. J Mater Process Technol 146 2 (2004) 250-262
30. Yeniay O., Unal R., and Lepsch R.A. Using dual response surfaces to reduce variability in launch vehicle design: a case study. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 91 4 (2006) 407-412
31. Hou S.J., Li Q., Long S.Y., Yang X.J., and Li W. Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem Anal Des 43 6-7 (2007) 555-565
32. Yang R.J., Wang N., Tho C.H., and Bobineau J.P. Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J Mech Des 127 5 (2005) 1014-1020
33. Hou S.J., Li Q., Long S.Y., Yanga X.J., and Li W. Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design. Int J Impact Eng 35 11 (2008) 1355-1367
34. Koch P.N., Yang R.J., and Gu L. Design for six sigma through robust optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 26 3-4 (2004) 235-248
35. Eberhart R, Kennedy J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, Nagoya (Japan); 1995, p. 39-43.
36. Fourie P.C., and Groenwold A.A. The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization. Struct Multidisciplinary Optim 23 4 (2002) 259-267
37. Gaing Z.L. A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 19 2 (2004) 384-391
38. Parsopoulos K.E., and Vrahatis M.N. On the computation of all global minimizers through particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8 3 (2004) 211-224
39. Robinson J., and Rahmat-Samii Y. Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 52 2 (2004) 397-407
40. Salman A., Ahmad I., and Al-Madani S. Particle swarm optimization for task assignment problem. Microprocess Microsyst 26 8 (2002) 363-371
41. Yoshida H., Kawata K., Fukuyama Y., Takayama S., and Nakanishi Y. A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 4 (2000) 1232-1239
42. Lee K.C., and Jhang J.Y. Application of particle swarm algorithm to the optimization of unequally spaced antenna arrays. J Electromagnet Waves Appl 20 14 (2006) 2001-2012
43. Raquel C, Naval P. An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, Washington (DC, USA); 2005.
44. Liu D.S., Tan K.C., Goh C.K., and Ho W.K. A multiobjective memetic algorithm based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B - Cybernet 37 1 (2007) 42-50
45. Wang N.M. A mathematical model of drawbead forces in sheet metal forming. J Appl Metal Work 2 3 (1982) 193-199
46. Levy B.S. Development of a predictive model for draw bead restraining force utilizing work of Nine and Wang. J Appl Metal Work 3 1 (1983) 38-44
47. Stoughton TB. Model of drawbead forces in sheet metal forming. In: Proceedings of the 15th biennial IDDRG congress, Dearborn (USA); 1998.
48. Obermeyer E.J., and Majlessi S.A. A review of recent advances is the application of blank-holder force towards improving the forming limits of sheet metal parts. J Mater Process Technol 75 1-3 (1998) 222-234
49. Szacinski A.M., and Thomson P.F. Investigation of the existence of a wrinkling-limit curve in plastically-deforming metal sheet. J Mater Process Technol 25 2 (1991) 125-137
50. Sun C.Z., Chen G.L., Lin Z.Q., and Zhao Y.X. Novel algorithm for determining optimal blankholder forces in deep drawing of aluminum alloy sheet. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 14 4 (2004) 675-680
51. Mohan L.V., and Shunmugam M.S. An orthogonal array based optimization algorithm for computer-aided measurement of worm surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30 5-6 (2006) 434-443