Mean square error criteria to multiresponse process optimization by a new genetic algorithm

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 175, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 1657-1674

  Köksoy, Onur ^a   Yalcinoz, Tankut ^a  

^a NIGDE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Combined array; Experimental design; Genetic algorithm; Mean square error; Multiresponse process optimization; Quality improvement; Robust design

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; HEURISTIC METHODS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMBINED ARRAY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MULTIRESPONSE PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33645853496     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lind E.E., Goldin J., and Hickman J.B. Fitting yield and cost response surfaces. Chemical Engineering Progress 56 (1960) 62-68
2. Del Castillo E., and Montgomery D.C. A non-linear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 25 (1993) 199-204
3. Derringer G., and Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 12 (1980) 214-219
4. Khuri A.I., and Conlon M. Simultaneous optimization of multiple response represented by polynomial regression functions. Technometrics 23 (1981) 363-375
5. Ames A.E., Mattucci N., Macdonald S., Szonyi G., and Hawkins D.M. Quality loss functions for optimization across multiple response surfaces. Journal of Quality Technology 29 (1997) 339-346
6. Vining G.G. A compromise approach to multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 30 (1998) 309-313
7. Pignatiello J.J. Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE Transactions 25 (1993) 5-15
8. Chiao C., and Hamada M. Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses. Journal of Quality Technology 33 (2001) 451-465
9. Romano D., Varetto M., and Vicario G. Multiresponse robust design: A general framework based on combined array. Journal of Quality Technology 36 (2004) 27-37
10. Myers R.H., Khuri A.I., and Vining G.G. Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach. The American Statistician 46 (1992) 131-139
11. Khuri A.I. Multiresponse surface methodology. In: Ghosh S., and Rao C.R. (Eds). Handbook of Statistics Vol. 13 (1996), Elsevier Science 377-406
12. Lin D.K.J., and Tu W. Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 27 (1995) 34-39
13. Battaglia G.J. Mean square error. AMP Journal of Technology 5 (1996) 31-36
14. Vining G.G., and Myers R.H. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 22 (1990) 38-45
15. Myers R.H., and Carter W.H. Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics 15 (1973) 301-317
16. Tang L.C., and Xu K. A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 34 (2002) 437-447
17. Köksoy O., and Doganaksoy N. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods. Journal of Quality Technology 35 (2003) 239-252
18. Köksoy O., and Yalcinoz T. A hopfield neural networks approach to the dual response problem. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 21 (2005) 595-603
19. Khuri A.I., and Cornell J.A. Response Surfaces (1996), Marcel Dekker
20. Montgomery D.C., and Bettencourt V.M. Multiple response surface methods in computer simulation. Simulation 29 (1977) 113-121
21. Jeong I., Jae Kim K., and Chang S.Y. Optimal weighting of bias and variance in dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 37 (2005) 236-247
22. Wright A.H. Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. In: Rawlins J.E. (Ed). Foundations of Genetic Algorithms (1991), Morgan Kaufmann 205-218
23. Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. 2nd ed. (1994), Springer-Verlag, Berlin