Exclusion of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from a wine model system mediated by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 423-435

  Arroyo López, F Noé ^a   Pérez Través, Laura ^b   Querol, Amparo ^b   Barrio, Eladio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Competitive exclusion; Hybridization; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces kudriavzevii; Wine fermentation

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ARTICLE; AUXOTROPHIC MUTANT; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; FUNGUS ISOLATION; GROWTH INHIBITION; GROWTH RATE; HIGH TEMPERATURE; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; WINE; WINE INDUSTRY; YEAST;

ANTIBIOSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GROWTH INHIBITORS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES; SELECTION, GENETIC; TEMPERATURE; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII;

EID: 79957967441     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1848     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arneborg N, Siegumfeldt H, Andersen HH, et al. 2005. Interactive optical trapping shows that confinement is a determinant of growth in a mixed yeast culture. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245: 155-159.
2. Arroyo-López FN, Orlić S, et al. 2009. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol 131: 120-127.
3. Arroyo-López FN, Pérez-Torrado R, Querol A, Barrio E. 2010a. Modulation of the glycerol and ethanol syntheses in the yeast Saccharomyces kudriavzevii differs from that exhibited by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their hybrid. Food Microbiol 27: 628-637.
4. Arroyo-López FN, Salvadó Z, Tronchoni J, et al. 2010b. Susceptibility and resistance to ethanol in Saccharomyces strains isolated from wild and fermentative environments. Yeast 27: 1005-1015.
5. Belloch C, Orlić S, Barrio E, Querol A. 2008. Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Int J Food Microbiol 122: 188-195.
6. Belloch C, Pérez-Torrado R, González SS, et al. 2009. Chimeric genomes of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2534-2544.
7. Bely L, Sablayrolles J, Barre P. 1990. Description of alcoholic fermentations kinetics: its variability and significance. Am J Enol Viticult 49: 319-324.
8. Boeke JD, Trueheart J, Natsoulis G, Fink GR. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol 154: 164-175.
9. Bradbury J, Richards K, Niederer H, et al. 2006. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Anton Leeuw Int J G 89: 27-37.
10. Casey GP, Ingledew WM. 1986. Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 13: 219-280.
11. Charoenchai C, Fleet G, Henschke PA. 1998. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth rates and cell biomass of wine yeasts. Am J Enol Viticult 49: 283-288.
12. de Barros Lopes M, Bellon JR, Shirley NJ, Ganter PF. 2002. Evidence for multiple interspecific hybridization in Saccharomyces sensu stricto species. FEMS Yeast Res 1: 323-331.
13. Demuyter C, Lollier M, Legras JL, Le Jeune C. 2004. Predominance of Saccharomyces uvarum during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation, for three consecutive years, in an Alsatian winery. J Appl Microbiol 97: 1140-1148.
14. Gangl H, Batusic M, Tscheik G, et al. 2008. Exceptional fermentation characteristics of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii. New Biotechnol 25: 244-251.
15. Gao C, Fleet GH. 1988. The effects of temperature and pH on the ethanol tolerance of the wine yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida stellata and Kloeckera apiculata. J Appl Bacteriol 65: 405-409.
16. Gibson AM, Bratchell N, Roberts TA. 1987. The effect of sodium chloride and temperature on the rate and extent of growth of Clostridium botulinum type A in pasteurized pork slurry. J Appl Bacteriol 62: 479-490.
17. Goddard MR. 2008. Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation. Ecology 89: 2077-2082.
18. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R, et al. 2010. A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol 12: 63-73.
19. González SS, Barrio E, Gafner J, Querol A. 2006. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. bayanus and S. kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 1221-1234.
20. González SS, Gallo L, Climent MD, et al. 2007. Enological characterization of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. Int J Food Microbiol 116: 11-18.
21. González SS, Barrio E, Querol A. 2008. Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2314-2320.
22. Granchi L, Ganucci D, Messini A, et al. 1998. Dynamics of yeast populations during the early stages of natural fermentations for the production of Brunello di Montalcino wines. Food Technol Biotechnol 36: 313-318.
23. Heard GM, Fleet GH. 1987. Occurrence and growth of killer yeasts during wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 53: 2171-2174.
24. Holm Hansen E, Nissen P, Sommer P, et al. 2001. The effect of oxygen on the survival of non-Saccharomyces yeasts during mixed culture fermentations of grape juice with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 91: 541-547.
25. Kenneth SZ, Sherman F. 1985. α-Aminoadipate as a primary nitrogen source for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants. J Bacteriol 162: 579-583.
26. Kishimoto M. 1994. Fermentation characteristics of hybrids between the cryophilic wine yeast Saccharomyces bayanus and the mesophilic wine yeast S. cerevisiae. J Ferment Bioeng 77: 432-435.
27. Le Jeune C, Lollier M, Demuyter C, et al. 2007. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. bayanus var. uvarum. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 540-549.
28. Lopandic K, Gangl H, Wallner E, et al. 2007. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 953-965.
29. Lopes CA, Barrio E, Querol A. 2010. Natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii share alleles with European wild populations of S. kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 10: 412-421.
30. Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, et al. 1998. New hybrid Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3887-3892.
31. McMeekin TA, Olley JN, Ross T, Ratkowsky DA. 1993. Predictive Microbiology: Theory and Application. Wiley: New York.
32. Mendoza LM, Manca de Nadra M, Farías ME. 2007. Kinetics and metabolic behaviour of a composite culture of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine-related strains. Biotechnol Lett 29: 1057-1063.
33. Monteiro FF, Bisson LF. 1991. Biological assay of nitrogen content of grape juice and prediction of sluggish fermentations. Am J Enol Viticult 42: 301-308.
34. Moreira N, Mendes F, Hogg T, Vasconcelos I. 2005. Alcohols, esters and heavy sulphur compounds production by pure and mixed cultures of apiculate wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 103: 285-294.
35. Moreira N, Mendes F, Guedes de Pinho P, et al. 2008. Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and H. guilliermondi grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must. Int J Food Microbiol 124: 231-238.
36. Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Louis EJ. 1995. Two new genetically isolated populations of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex from Japan. J Gen Appl Microbiol 41: 499-505.
37. Naumov GI, Masneuf I, Naumova ES, et al. 2000a. Association of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum with some French wines: genetic analysis of yeast populations. Res Microbiol 151: 683-691.
38. Naumov GI, James SA, Naumova ES, et al. 2000b. Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: S. cariocanus, S. kudriavzevii and S. mikatae. Int J System Evol Microbiol 50: 1931-1942.
39. Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Antunovics Z, Sipiczki M. 2002. Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum in Tokaj wine-making of Slovakia and Hungary. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59: 727-730.
40. Nissen P, Arneborg N. 2003. Characterization of early deaths of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol 180: 257-263.
41. Nissen P, Nielsen D, Arneborg N. 2003. Viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells at high concentrations causes early growth arrest of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures by a cell-cell contact-mediated mechanisms. Yeast 20: 331-341.
42. Piškur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, et al. 2006. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer?. Trends Genet 22: 183-186.
43. Pretorius IS. 2000. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16: 675-729.
44. Puig S, Querol A, Barrio E, Pérez-Ortín JE. 2000. Mitotic recombination and genetic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 2057-2061.
45. Pulvirenti A, Zambonelli C, Todaro A, Giudici P. 2002. Interspecific hybridisation by digestive tract of invertebrates as a source of environmental biodiversity within Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann Microbiol 52: 245-255.
46. Querol A, Huerta T, Barrio E, Ramón D. 1992. Dry yeast strain for use in fermentation of Alicante wines-selection and DNA patterns. J Food Sci 57: 183-185.
47. Querol A, Fleet G. 2006. Yeasts in Food and Beverages. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
48. Rainieri S, Zambonelli C, Kaneko Y. 2003. Saccharomyces sensu stricto: systematics, genetic diversity and evolution. J Biosci Bioeng 96: 1-9.
49. Rementería A, Rodríguez JA, Cadaval A, et al. 2003. Yeast associated with spontaneous fermentations of white wines from the 'Txakoli de Bizkaia' region (Basque Country, North Spain). Int J Food Microbiol 86: 201-207.
50. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. 2003. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20: 1369-1385.
51. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. 2008. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2144-2152.
52. Sato M, Kishimoto M, Watari J, Takashio M. 2002. Breeding of brewer's yeast by hybridization between a top-fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a cryophilic yeast S. bayanus. J Biosci Bioeng 93: 509-511.
53. Serra A, Strehaiano P, Taillandier P. 2005. Influence of temperature and pH on Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum growth; impact of a wine yeast interspecific hybridization on these parameters. Int J Food Microbiol 104: 257-265.
54. Sipiczki M. 2008. Interspecies hybridization and recombination in Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 996-1007.
55. Spencer JFT, Spencer DM. 1996. Rare-mating and cytoduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Methods in Molecular Biology. Yeast Protocols, Evans I (ed.). Humana Press: Totowa, NJ; 39-44.
56. Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, et al. 2005. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat Genet 37: 630-635.
57. Torija MJ, Rozès N, Poblet M, et al. 2003. Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 80: 47-53.
58. Tosi E, Azzolini M, Guzzo F, Zapparoli G. 2009. Evidence of different fermentation behaviours of two indigenous strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. uvarum isolated from Amarone wine. J Appl Microbiol 107: 210-218.
59. Van Boekel MAJS. 2002. On the use of the Weibull model to describe thermal inactivation of microbial vegetative cells. Int J Food Microbiol 74: 139-159.
60. Winer BJ. 1962. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill: New York.