Modulation of the glycerol and ethanol syntheses in the yeast Saccharomyces kudriavzevii differs from that exhibited by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their hybrid

Food Microbiology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 628-637

  Arroyo López, F Noé ^a   Pérez Torrado, Roberto ^b   Querol, Amparo ^b   Barrio, Eladio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Glycerol; GPDH activity; Response surface methodology; Saccharomyces; Wine

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLYCEROL; GLYCEROL 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ETHANOL; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GLYCEROL; GLYCEROLPHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII IFO 1802;

EID: 77954818150     PISSN: 07400020     EISSN: 10959998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. +-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. EMBO J. 1997, 16:2179-2187.
2. Arroyo-López F.N., Orlić S., Querol A., Barrio E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 131:120-127.
3. Baranyi J., Pin C., Ross T. Validating and comparing predictive models. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 48:159-166.
4. Belloch C., Orlić S., Barrio E., Querol A. Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122:188-195.
5. Bely L., Sablayrolles J., Barre P. Description of alcoholic fermentations kinetics: its variability and significance. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1990, 49:319-324.
6. Bertolini L., Zambonelli C., Giudici P., Castellari L. Higher alcohol production by cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1996, 47:343-345.
7. Bradbury J., Richards K., Niederer H., Lee S., Rod Dunbar P., Gardner R. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 2006, 89:27-37.
8. Castellari L., Ferruzi M., Magrini A., Giudici P., Passarelli P., Zambonelli C. Unbalanced wine fermentation by cryotolerant vs. non-cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains. Vitis 1994, 33:49-52.
9. Cronwright G.R., Rohwer J.M., Prior B.A. Metabolic control analysis of glycerol synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:4448-4456.
10. Eustace R., Thornton R.J. Selective hybridization of wine yeast for higher yields of glycerol. Can. J. Microbiol. 1987, 33:112-117.
11. Gardner N., Rodrigues N., Champagne C.P. Combined effects of sulfites, temperature, and agitation time on production of glycerol in grape juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59:2022-2028.
12. Giudici P., Zambonelli C., Passarelli P., Castellari L. Improvement of wine composition with cryotolerant Saccharomyces strains. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1995, 46:143-147.
13. González, S.S., 2005. El papel de nuevas especies de Saccharomyces y sus híbridos en procesos de vinificación. Doctoral thesis, Department of Chemistry, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.
14. González S.S., Barrio E., Gafner J., Querol A. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6:1221-1234.
15. González S.S., Gallo L., Climent M.D., Barrio E., Querol A. Enological characterization of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 116:11-18.
16. Hayashi M., Maeda T. Activation of the HOG pathway upon cold stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biochem. 2006, 139:797-803.
17. Hittinger C.T., Rokas A., Carroll S.B. Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:14144-14149.
18. Izawa S., Sato M., Yokoigawa K., Inoue Y. Intracellular glycerol influences resistance to freeze stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of a quadruple mutant in glycerol dehydrogenase genes and glycerol-enriched cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66:108-114.
19. Johansson M., Sjöstrom J.E. Enhanced production of glycerol in an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH 1) deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett. 1984, 6:49-54.
20. Jones G.V., White M.A., Cooper O.R., Storchmann K. Climate change and global wine quality. Clim. Change 2005, 73:319-343.
21. Michnick S., Roustan J.L., Remize F., Barre P., Dequin S. Modulation of glycerol and ethanol yields during alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressed or disrupted for GPD1 encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Yeast 1997, 13:783-793.
22. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York. second ed.
23. Naumov G.I., James S.A., Naumova E.S., Louis E.J., Roberts I.N. Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces mikatae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50:1931-1942.
24. Nevoigt E., Stahl U. Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 21:231-241.
25. Ough C.S., Fong D., Amerine M.A. Glycerol in wine: determination and some factors affecting. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1972, 23:1-5.
26. Panadero J., Pallotti C., Rodríguez-Vargas S., Randez-Gil F., Prieto J.A. A downshift in temperature activates the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, which determines freeze tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:4638-4645.
27. Pretorius I.S. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 2000, 16:675-729.
28. Prior B.A., Baccari C., Mortimer R.K. Selective breeding of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase glycerol levels in wine. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 1999, 33:57-65.
29. Querol A., Huerta T., Barrio E., Ramón D. Dry yeast-strain for use in fermentation of Alicante wines - selection and DNA patterns. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57:183.
30. Querol A., Fleet G. Yeasts in Food and Beverages 2006, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
31. Redzepović S., Orlić S., Sikora S., Majdar A., Pretorius I.S. Identification and characterisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains isolated from Croatian vineyards. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 35:305-310.
32. Remize F., Roustan J.L., Sablayrolles J.M., Barre P., Dequin S. Glycerol overproduction by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains leads to substantial changes in byproduct formation and to a stimulation of fermentation rate in the stationary phase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:143-149.
33. + acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66:3151-3159.
34. Remize F., Sablayrolles J.M., Dequin S. Re-assessment of the influence of yeast strain and environmental factors on glycerol production in wine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88:371-378.
35. Remize F., Barnavon L., Dequin S. Glycerol export and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, but not glycerol phosphatase, are rate limiting for glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2001, 3:301-312.
36. Rossignol T., Dulau L., Julien A., Blondin B. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 2003, 20:1369-1385.
37. Sampaio J.P., Gonçalves P. Natural population of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:2144-2152.
38. Scanes K.T., Hohmann S., Prior B.A. Glycerol production by yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relevance to wine: a review. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 1998, 19:17-24.
39. Schütz M., Gafner J. Dynamics of the yeast strain population during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation determined by CHEF gel electrophoresis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1994, 19:253-257.
40. +-dependent glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, explains their different contributions to redox-driven glycerol production. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:3977-3985.
41. Yalcin S.K., Ozbas Z.Y. Effects of pH and temperature on growth and glycerol production kinetics of two indigenous wine strains of S. cerevisiae from turkey. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2008, 39:325-332.