Devices to improve colon polyp detection

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1092-1097

  Mamula, Petar ^a   Tierney, William M ^a   Banerjee, Subhas ^a   Desilets, David ^a   Diehl, David L ^a   Farraye, Francis A ^a   Kaul, Vivek ^a   Kethu, Sripathi R ^a   Kwon, Richard S ^a   Pedrosa, Marcos C ^a   Rodriguez, Sarah A ^a   Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

ADENOMA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS;

EID: 79957845959     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:129-31.
3. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130-60.
4. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
5. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50. (Pubitemid 43381678)
6. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2866-77. (Pubitemid 44902662)
7. Huh KC, Rex DK. Advances in colonoscope technique and technology. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2008;8:223-32.
8. Farraye FA, Adler DG, Chand B, et al. Update on CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:393-8.
9. Song LM, Adler DG, Conway JD, et al. Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:581-9. (Pubitemid 351406354)
10. DiSario JA, Petersen BT, Tierney WM, et al. Enteroscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:872-80. (Pubitemid 47600195)
11. Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. . Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2000-5. (Pubitemid 37185796)
12. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2138-42. (Pubitemid 39524703)
13. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R, et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:109-14. (Pubitemid 50008421)
14. Tada M, Inoue H, Yabata E, et al. Feasibility of the transparent cap-fitted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:618-21. (Pubitemid 27200708)
15. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:75-81. (Pubitemid 46072045)
16. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:341-5. (Pubitemid 351248707)
17. Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, et al. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:637-44.
18. Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ, et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:41-6.
19. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 1998;30:444-7. (Pubitemid 28353551)
20. Dafnis GM. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study. Endoscopy 2000;32:381-4. (Pubitemid 30219154)
21. Triadafilopoulos G, Watts HD, Higgins J, et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:139-44. (Pubitemid 44932165)
22. East JE, Saunders BP, Burling D, et al. Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2529-35. (Pubitemid 47631767)
23. Triadafilopoulos G, Li J. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2008;40:478-82. (Pubitemid 351911836)
24. Waye JD, Heigh RI, Fleischer DE, et al. A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:551-6.
25. DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, et al. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:542-50.
26. Leufkens A, Demarco C, Rastogi C, et al. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:480-9.
27. Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW, et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 2006;38:739-42. (Pubitemid 44044405)