A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 139-144

  Triadafilopoulos, George ^a   Watts, H David ^a   Higgins, Jack ^a   Van Dam, Jacques ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; DEVICE; IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; VIDEORECORDING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 33845476094     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.044     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 1977-1981
2. Winawer S.J., Stewart E.T., Zauber A.G., et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance following polypectomy. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1766-1772
3. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
4. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 162-168
5. Citarda F., Tomaselli G., Capocaccia R., et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 48 (2001) 812-815
6. Winawer S.J., and Zauber A.G. Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut 48 (2001) 753-754
7. Lieberman D. Quality and colonoscopy: a new imperative. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 392-394
8. Van Dam J. Prevention of colorectal cancer by endoscopic polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 123 (1995) 949-950
9. Van Dam J., and Friedman L.S. Missed cancers at colonoscopy: learning the hard way. Gastrointest Endosc 45 (1997) 530-533
10. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 37 (1991) 125-127
11. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
12. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
13. Pickhardt P.J. Limitations of virtual colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 155
14. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
15. Hwang I., and Wong R.K.H. Limitations of virtual colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 142 (2005) 154-155
16. Waye J.D., and Braunfeld S. Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 14 (1982) 79-81
17. Bensen S., Mott L.A., Dain B., et al. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 94 (1999) 194-199
18. Kasugai K., Miyata M., Hashimoto T., et al. Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy. Dig Endosc 17 (2005) 44-49
19. Rex D.K., Rahmani E.Y., Haseman J.H., et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 17-23
20. Haseman J.H., Lemmel G.T., Rahmani E.Y., et al. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 45 (1997) 451-455
21. Pabby A., Schoen R.E., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 385-391
22. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
23. Sanchez W., Petersen B.T., Ott B., et al. Evaluation of diagnostic yield in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) AB213
24. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
25. Rex D., Bond J., and Feld A. Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 951-956
26. Plumeri P.A. Colonoscopic gamble. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 946-947
27. Feld A.D. Malpractice risks associated with colon cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1641-1644
28. Matsumoto T., Iida M., Kuwano Y., et al. Minute non-polypoid adenoma of the colon detected by colonoscopy: correlation between endoscopic and histologic findings. Gastrointest Endosc 38 (1992) 645-650
29. Tada S., Iida M., Matsumoto T., et al. Small flat cancer of the rectum: clinicopathologic and endoscopic features. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 109-113
30. Yokota T., Sugihara K., Yokoyama T., et al. Small depressed cancer of the large bowel: report of three cases. Am J Gastroenterol 90 (1995) 134-136
31. Mitooka H., Fujimori T., Maeda S., et al. Minute flat depressed neoplastic lesions of the colon detected by contrast chromoscopy using an indigo carmine capsule. Gastrointest Endosc 41 (1995) 453-459
32. Jaramillo E., Watanabe M., Slezak P., et al. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 114-122
33. Wada R., Matsukuma S., Abe H., et al. Histopathological studies of superficial-type early colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 77 (1996) 44-50
34. Kanamori T., Itoh M., Yokoyama Y., et al. Endoscopic and clinicopathologic evaluation of four cases of minute flat invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 44 (1996) 75-79
35. Hart A.R., Kudo S., Mackay E.H., et al. Flat adenomas exist in asymptomatic people: important implications for colorectal cancer screening programmes. Gut 43 (1998) 229-231
36. Fujii T., Rembacken B.J., Dixon M.F., et al. Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed?. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 437-443
37. Rembacken B.J., Caims A., Dixon M.F., et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1,000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 255 (2000) 1211-1214
38. Saitoh Y., Waxman I., West A.B., et al. Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 120 (2001) 1657-1665
39. Tsuda S., Veress B., Tóth E., et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51 (2002) 550-555
40. Hurlstone D.P., Cross S.S., Adam I., et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the UK. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2543-2549
41. O'Brien M.J., Winawer S.J., and Zauber A.G. Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 (2004) 905-911
42. Ross A.S., and Waxman I. Flat and depressed neoplasms of the colon in western populations. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 172-180
43. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
44. ° wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
45. Rex D.K. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 1504-1507
46. Harrison M., Singh N., and Rex D.K. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 519-522
47. Matsushita M., Hajiro K., Okazaki K., et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 444-447
48. Fidler J.L., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., et al. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27 (2002) 292-300
49. Johnson C.D., Harmsen W.S., Wilson L.A., et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125 (2003) 311-319
50. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
51. Van Gelder R.E., Nio C.Y., Florie J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 41-48
52. Nicholson F.B., Barro J.L., Bartram C.I., et al. The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 100 (2005) 2315-2323
53. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311
54. Banerjee S., and Van Dam J. CT colonography for colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 121-133