Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 228-235

  Ghaleb, Nathalie ^a   Bouserhal, Joseph ^a   Bassil Nassif, Nayla ^a  

^a SAINT JOSEPH UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTIST; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PUBLIC OPINION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; MALE; MAXILLA; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PUBLIC OPINION; SMILING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957814728     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq059     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrews W A 2008 Anteroposterior relationship of the maxillary central incisor to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthodontist 78: 662-669
2. Arnett G W, Bergman R T 1993 Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 103: (Part I) 299-312 and (Part II) 395-411
3. Bass N M 2003 Measurement of the profle angle and the aesthetic analysis of the facial profle. Journal of Orthodontics 30: 3-9
4. Beall A E 2007 Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful? Dental Clinics of North America 51: 289-297
5. Bumann A et al. 1994 Références céphalomé triques de la position des incisives. Orthodontie Française 65: 11-49
6. Crétot M 1997 Modifcations dento-céphalométriques spontanées après le stade adulte jeune. Orthodontie Française 68: 41-55
7. De Brondeau F, Boileau M-J, Duhart A-M 2001 Impact esthétique des extractions. Revue d'Orthopédie Dento Faciale 35: 251-273
8. Devreese H, De Pauw G, Van Maele G, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, Dermaut L 2007 Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients. European Journal of Orthodontics 29: 314-320
9. Fitzgerald J P, Nanda R S, Currier G F 1992 An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 328-334
10. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga M I, Lagravère M O, Major P W 2004 Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. Journal of Orthodontics 31: 204-209
11. Frindel F 2001 Pour un meilleur positionnement du sourire. Revue d'Orthopédie Dento Faciale 35: 473-497
12. Howells D J, Shaw W C 1985 The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 402-408 (Pubitemid 16221365)
13. Isiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçin S 2006 Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 8-16
14. Janzen E K 1977 A balanced smile: a most important treatment objective. American Journal of Orthodontics 72: 359-372 (Pubitemid 8208494)
15. Johnston C D, Burden D J, Stevenson M R 1999 The infuence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 517-522
16. Kerns L L, Silveira A M, Kerns D G, Regennitter F J 1997 Esthetic preference of the frontal and profle views of the same smile. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 9: 76-85 (Pubitemid 127789561)
17. Kokich V O Jr, Kiyak A H, Shapiro P A 1999 Comparing the perception of dentists and laypeople to altered dental esthetics. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11: 311-324
18. Lamarque S 1999 De l'idéal à la réalité clinique: quelques concepts pour un sourire. Journal de l'Edgewise 39: 7-33
19. Mackley R J 1993 An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontist 63: 183-189
20. Moss J P, Linney A D, Lowey M N 1995 The use of three-dimensional techniques in facial esthetics. Seminars in Orthodontics 1: 94-104
21. Parekh S M, Fields H W, Beck M, Rosenstiel S 2006 Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthodontist 76: 557-563 (Pubitemid 44066008)
22. Peck H, Peck S 1970 A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthodontist 40: 284-318
23. Philippe J 1987 Les dents du sourire. Revue d'Orthopédie Dento Faciale 21: 75-86
24. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J 2005 The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127: 343-350 (Pubitemid 40386460)
25. Ross V A, Isaacson R J, Germane N, Rubenstein L K 1990 Infuence of vertical growth pattern on faciolingual inclinations and treatment mechanics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 422-429
26. Sarver D 2001 The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 120: 98-111 (Pubitemid 33601235)
27. Sarver D, Ackerman M 2003 Dynamic smile visualization and quantifcation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: (Part 1) 4-12 and (Part 2) 116-127
28. Sarver D M, Profft W R 2005 Special considerations in diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Graber T M, Vanarsdall R L, Vig K W L (eds.). Orthodontics: current principles and techniques, 4th edn. Elsevier-Mosby, St Louis, pp. 18-25. 43-55
29. Schabel B J, McNamara J A Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Jamieson S A 2008 The relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System. Angle Orthodontist 78: 579-584
30. Schlosser J B, Preston C B, Lampasso J 2005 The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127: 17-24 (Pubitemid 40092248)
31. Shaw W C, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles C R 1985 The infuence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 21-26
32. Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S 2001 Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. HarperCollins Publishers, New York
33. Tedesco L A, Albino J E, Cunat J J, Green L J, Lewis E A 1983 A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 38-43
34. Thomas J L, Hayes C, Zawaideh S 2003 The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthodontist 73: 359-364 (Pubitemid 38968898)
35. Wagner I V, Carlsson G E, Ekstrand K, Odman P, Schneider N 1996 A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 8: 199-205 (Pubitemid 126799150)
36. Zachrisson B U 1998 Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile: vertical dimension. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 32: 432-445 (Pubitemid 128113686)