The relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO objective grading system

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 579-584

  Schabel, Brian J ^a   McNamara, James A ^a,b,c,d   Baccetti, Tiziano ^e,f   Franchi, Lorenzo ^e,f   Jamieson, Scott A ^a,g  

^a School of Dentistry ^*

^b School of Dentistry

^c School of Medicine

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^g The American Board of Orthodontics   (United States)

Author keywords

American Board of Orthodontics; Digital imaging; Q sort; Smile esthetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 45849138832     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0579:TRBPSE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:589-599.
2. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, et al. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:125-139.
3. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). J Orthod. 2000;27:149-162.
4. Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:2-11.
5. Schabel BJ, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Q-Sort Assessment vs Visual Analog Scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. In press.
6. Stephenson W. The Study of Behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1953.
7. Coy K, Speltz ML, Jones K. Facial appearance and attachment in infants with orofacial clefts: a replication. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39:66-72.
8. American Board of Orthodontics. Information for the Candidates. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: American Board of Orthodontics; 1997.
9. Riedel RA. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 1950;20:168-178.
10. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos. 1899;41:248-264.
11. Downs WB. Analysis of the dento-facial profile. Angle Orthod. 1956;26:191-212.
12. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:8-29.
13. Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:234-241.
14. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res. 1997;2:49-52.