Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 314-320

  Devreese, H ^a   De Pauw, G ^a   Van Maele, G ^b   Kuijpers Jagtman, A M ^c   Dermaut, L ^a  

^a School of Dentistry

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL CARE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548388930     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm011     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Almeida M A, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C J F 1995 Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthodontist 65: 43-48
2. Bailey L J, Esmailnejad A, Almeida M A 1996 Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthodontist 66: 73-78
3. Ballard C F 1956 Morphology and treatment of Class II, division 2 occlusions. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society pp.44-54
4. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971 a The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 111-127
5. Baumrind S, Frantz R C 1971b The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 505-517
6. Bennett D T, Smales F C 1968 Orientated study models. Dental Practitioner 18: 353-355
7. Berg R 1983 Stability of deep overbite correction. European Journal of Orthodontics 5: 75-83
8. Binda S K R, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, Maertens J K M, van 't Hof M A 1994 A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 301-308
9. Canut J A, Arias S 1999 A long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions: a retrospective study model analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 377-386
10. Carey C W 1952 Diagnosis and case analysis in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics 38: 149-161
11. Dahlberg G 1940 Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York
12. Dippenaar A M 2003 Utilising radiographic incisor crown markers to determine incisor inclination on lateral headfilms - an experimental study on extracted teeth, Thesis, University of Pretoria
13. Fletcher G G T 1975 The retroclined upper incisor. British Journal of Orthodontics 2: 207-216
14. Hasstedt C W 1956 A serial cephalometric study of the effects of orthodontic treatment on incisal overbite and the soft tissue profile. Thesis, University of Washington
15. Hatton M E, Grainger R M 1958 Reliability of measurements from cephalograms at the Burlington Orthodontic Research Center. Journal of Dental Research 87: 853-859
16. Hoggan B R, Sadowsky C 2001 The use of palatal rugae for assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 119: 482-488
17. Houston W J B 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
18. Houston W J B, Mayer R E, McElroy D, Sherriff M 1986 Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 149-151
19. Jacobson A 1995 Radiographic cephalometry. Quintessence, Chicago, pp. 1-5, 197-299
20. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R 2001 The clinical significance or error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. European Journal of Orthodontics 23: 569-578
21. Kim T-W, Little R M 1999 Postretention assessment of deep overbite correction in Class II division 2 malocclusion, Angle Orthodontist 69: 175-186
22. Lapatki B G, Mager A S, Schulte-Mönting J, Jonas I E 2002 The importance of the level of the lip line and resting lip pressure in Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Journal of Dental Research 81: 323-328
23. Lear C S L 1976 Three dimensional analysis of changes in location of crowns and apices of maxillary incisors. Angle Orthodontist 46: 338-344
24. Lebret L 1962 Growth changes of the palate. Journal of Dental Research 41: 1391-1404
25. Luffingham J K 1982 The lower lip and the maxillary central incisor. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 263-268
26. Lundström A 1955 Inter-maxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment in occlusion. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 12: 266-292
27. Midtgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S 1974 Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthodontist 44: 56-61
28. Mills J R E 1973 The problem of overbite in Class II, division 2 malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics 1: 34-48
29. Nicol W A 1954 The morphology of the lips in relation to the incisor teeth. Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics pp .25-28
30. Nicol W A 1955 The relationship of the lip line to the incisor teeth. Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics pp.75-81
31. Nicol W A 1963 The lower lip and the upper incisor teeth in Angle's Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Dental Practitioner 14: 179-182
32. Payne G W 1964 A cephalometric analysis of the effects of growth on certain anatomical facial planes after orthodontic treatment. Thesis, University of Washington
33. Peavy D C, Kendrick G S 1967 The effects of tooth movement on the palatine rugae. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 18: 536-542
34. Perera P S G 1981 Orientating dental casts to cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthodontist 51: 246-251
35. Proffit W R 1978 Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of teeth. Angle Orthodontist 48: 175-186
36. Richmond S 1987 Recording the dental cast in three dimensions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 92: 199-206
37. Richmond S, Jones M L 1985 A comparison of two and three dimensional incisor angles. British Journal of Orthodontics 12: 90-96
38. Richmond S, Klufas M L, Sywanyk M 1998 Assessing incisor inclination: a non-invasive technique. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 721-726
39. Ridley D R 1960 Some factors concerned with the reduction of excessive incisor overbite in Angle's Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Transactions of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics pp. 118-140
40. Riedel R A 1960 A review of the retention problem. Angle Orthodontist 30: 179-199
41. Sandler P J 1988 Effect of patient repositioning on cephalometric measurements. British Journal of Orthodontics 15: 17-22
42. Schudy F F 1968 The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist 38: 19-39
43. Schweitzer M, Pancherz H 2001 The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthodontist 71: 358-363
44. Selwyn-Barnett BJ 1991 Rationale of treatment for Class II, division 2 malocclusion. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 173-181
45. Simmons J D, Moore R N, Erickson L C 1987 A longitudinal study of anteroposterior growth changes in the palatine rugae. Journal of Dental Research 66: 1512-1515
46. Simons M E, Joondeph D R 1973 Change in overbite: a ten-year postretention study. American Journal of Orthodontics 64: 349-367
47. Tng T T H, Chan T C K, Hägg U, Cooke M S 1994 Validity of cephalometric landmarks. An experimental study on human skulls. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 110-120
48. van der Linden F P G M 1978 Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to rugae points. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 142-161
49. van der Linden F P G M 1983 Development of the dentition. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Chicago
50. van der Linden F G P M 1986 Facial growth and facial orthopedics. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Chicago
51. van der Linden F P G M, Boersma H 1988 Diagnose und Behandlungsplanung in der Kierferorthopädie. Band 3. Quintesszenz Verlag, Berlin
52. Vig P S, Cohen A M 1979 Vertical growth of the lips: a serial cephalometric study. American Journal of Orthodontics 75: 405-415
53. Weinstein S, Haack D C, Morris L Y, Snyder B B, Attaway H E 1963 On an equilibrium theory of tooth position. Angle Orthodontist 33: 1-26