Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-12

  Sarver, David M ^a,d   Ackerman, Marc B ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; ESTHETICS; EVOLUTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECORDING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0038383531     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00306-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wuerpel E.H. My friend, Edward Hartley Angle. Dent Cosmos. LXXI:1931;908-921.
2. Krogman WS, Sassouni V. A syllabus in roentgenographic cephalometry. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Growth Study; 1957.
3. Hulsey C.M. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 57:1970;132-144.
4. Mackley R.J. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 63:1993;183-190.
5. Peck S., Peck L., Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod. 62:1992;91-100.
6. Zachrisson B.U. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile vertical dimension . J Clin Orthod. 32:1998;432-445.
7. Phillips E. The classification of smile patterns. J Can Dent Assoc. 65:1999;252-254.
8. Ackerman M.B., Ackerman J. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 36:2002;221-236.
9. Ackerman J.L. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res. 2:1999;49-52.
10. Sarver D.M., Ackerman J.L. Orthodontics about face the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 117:2000;575-576.
11. Angle E.H. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos. 41:1899;248-264. 350-7.
12. Brisman A.S. Esthetics a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts . J Am Dent Assoc. 100:1980;345-352.
13. Ackerman J.L., Proffit W.R. The characteristics of malocclusion a modern approach to classification and diagnosis . Am J Orthod. 56:1969;443-454.
14. Ackerman J.L., Proffit W.R. Diagnosis and planning treatment in orthodontics. Graber T.M., Swain B.F. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques. 1975;1-100 WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
15. Braun S. Diagnosis driven vs. appliance driven treatment outcomes. Sachdeva R.C.L. Orthodontics for the next millennium. 1997;32-45 Ormco, Glendora, Calif.
16. Sarver D.M. Esthetic orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1998;Mosby, St. Louis.
17. Kokich V.O. Jr, Kiyak H.A., Shapiro P.A. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 11:1999;311-324.
18. Sarver D.M. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile the smile arc . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 120:2001;98-111.
19. Morley J., Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc. 132:2001;39-45.
20. Darwin C. The expression of emotions in man and animals. 1882;Meredith Publishing, Des Moines, Iowa.
21. Duchenne de Boulogne G.M. The mechanism of human facial expression. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
22. Vig R.G., Brundo G.C. The kinetics of anterior tooth display. J Prosthet Dent. 39:1975;502-504.
23. Rigsbee O.H., Sperry T.P., BeGole E.A. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 3:1988;233-239.
24. Nafziger Y.J. A study of patient facial expressivity in relation to orthodontic/surgical treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 106:1993;227-237.
25. Ackerman MB. Digital video as a clinical tool in orthodontics: dynamic smile design in diagnosis and treatment planning. In: McNamara JA, editor. 29th Annual Moyer's Symposium. Vol 40. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Department of Orthodontics; 2003.
26. Ackerman J.L., Proffit W.R. Treatment response as an aid in diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 57:1970;490-496.
27. Brodie A.G. Cephalometric roentgenology history, technics, and uses . J Oral Surg. 7:1949;185-198.
28. Janzen E. A balanced smile - a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod. 72:1977;359-372.
29. Ackerman J.L., Ackerman M.B., Brensinger C.M., Landis J.R. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1:1998;2-11.
30. Rubin L.R. The anatomy of a smile its importance in the treatment of facial paralysis . Plast Reconstr Surg. 53:1974;384-387.
31. Subtelny J.D. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod. 45:1959;481-507.
32. Vig P.S., Cohen A.M. Vertical growth of the lips a serial cephalometric study . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 75:1979;405-415.
33. Mammandras A.H. Linear changes of the maxillary and mandibular lips. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 94:1988;405-410.
34. Dickens S, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. The dynamics of the maxillary incisor and the upper lip: a cross-sectional study of resting and smile hard tissue characteristics. World J Orthod 2003;3:313-20.
35. Gillen R.J., Schwartz R.S., Hilton T.J., Evans D.B. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont. 7:1994;410-417.