AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 662-669

  Andrews, Will Alan ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Forehead; Incisors

Indexed keywords

EID: 45849103078     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0662:AROTMC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dorsey J, Korabik K. Social and psychological motivations for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:460-467.
2. Kilpelanien P, Phillips C, Tulloch JFC. Anterior tooth position and motivation for early treatment. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:171-174.
3. McKiernan EXF, McKiernan F, Jones ML. Psychological profile and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1992;7:1887-1898.
4. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:111-127.
5. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:505-517.
6. Kvam E, Krogstad O. Variability in tracings of lateral head plates for diagnostic orthodontic purposes. Acta Odont Scand. 1969;27:359-369.
7. Richardson A. An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:637-651.
8. Sandler PJ. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements. Brit J Orthod. 1988;1:105-110.
9. Tourne LPM, Bevis RL, Cavanaugh G. A validity test of cephalometric variables as a measure of clinical applicability in antero-posterior profile assessment. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1993;8:95-112.
10. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Dann C. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1993;8:171-179.
11. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:175-183.
12. Moss JP, Linney AD, Lowey MN. The use of three-dimensional techniques in facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:94-104.
13. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning - part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:299-312.
14. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning - part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:395-411.
15. Bergman RT. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:373-389.
16. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1967;58:262-284.
17. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod. 1958;44:1-25.
18. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA, Deutsch C, Munro IR. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:52-60.
19. Hambleton RS. The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod. 1982;50:405-420.
20. Hambleton RS. The orthodontic curtain. Angle Orthod. 1963;33:294-298.
21. Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:804-822.
22. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:284-318.
23. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Esthetic Face. New York, NY: Thieme-Stratton; 1984.
24. Satravaha S, Schlegel KD. The significance of the integumentary profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:422-426.
25. Spradley FL, Jacobs JD, Crowe DP. Assessment of the anteroposterior soft-tissue contour of the lower facial third in the ideal young adult. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:316-325.
26. Fields HW, Vann WF, Vig KW. Reliability of soft tissue profile analysis in children. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:159-165.
27. Kuyl MH, Verbeek RMH, Dermaut LR. The integumental profile: a reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:597-604.
28. Kasai K. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:674-684.
29. Lin PT, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or non-extraction treatment. Aust Orthod J. 2004;21:71-86.
30. Lo FD, Hunter WS. Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:384-391.
31. Moseling KP, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:51-62.
32. Rains MD, Nanda R. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:481-488.
33. Ramos AL, Sakima MT, Pinto AS, Bowman SJ. Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction - a metallic implant study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:499-505.
34. Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:385-394.
35. Andrews LF, Andrews WA. Syllabus of the Andrews Orthodontic Philosophy. 8th ed. San Diego, Calif: Lawrence F. Andrews; 1999.
36. Schlosser JB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:17-24.
37. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.