Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 76-85

  Kerns, Lisa Loomis ^a   Silveira, Anibal M ^a   Kerns, David C ^a   Recennitter, Frederick J ^a  

^a US Army Dental Activity Fort Gordon   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KENTUCKY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMILING;

EID: 0031308649     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00921.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wylie WL. The mandibular incisor—its role in facial esthetics. Angk Orthod 1955; 25:32–41.
2. Goldstein R. Study of need for esthetics in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 21:589–598.
3. Proffit W. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis : CV Mosby, 1986.
4. Ricketts R. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968; 54:272–289.
5. Holdaway R. A soft-tissue cephafometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84:1–14.
6. Merrifield LL. Charles H. Tweed International Foundation for Orthodontic Research, 1993.
7. Scheideman G, Bell W, Lqan H, Finn R, Reisch J. Gphalometrk analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 1980; 78:404–420.
8. Burstone C. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967; 53:262–284.
9. Gonznles-Ulloa M. The role of chin correction in profile plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1961; 36:364–373.
10. Czarnecki S, Nanda R. Currier G.Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacid Orthop 1993; 103:180–187.
11. Anrnett G. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103:299–312.
12. Bell R, Kiyak A, Joondeph D. et al. perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88:323–332.
13. Prahl-Anderson B, Boarsme H, Van den Linden F, et al. Perception of dentofacial morphology by lay persons. general dentists, and orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98:209–212.
14. Lines P, Lines R, Lines C. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978; 73:648–657.
15. Riedel RA. Analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 1957; 43:103–119.
16. Moore A. A critique of orthodontic dogma. Angk Orthod 1969; 39:69–82.
17. Tabachnick BC, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 2nd Ed. New York : Harper & Row, 1989.
18. Cunningham MR. Masuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi experiments on the sociobiology of female facial bcouty J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50:925–935.
19. Bruning JL, Kintz EL. Computational handbook of Statistics. Scott. Foresman. and Company. 1968.
20. Mackley R. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993; 63:183–189.
21. Farkas L. Munro I. Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. New York : Thieme-Stratton Inc., 1987.
22. Peck S, Peck L, Kataia M. The gingiva smile. Angk Orthod 1992; 62:90–100.
23. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Some vertical lineaments of lip position. Am J Orthod 1992; 101 519–524.
24. Golub-Evans J. Unity and variety: essential ingredients of a design. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1994; 1–5 (Editorial).
25. Moskowitz M, Nayyar A. Determinants of dental esthetics: a rationale for smile analysis and treatment. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1995; 16:1164–1166.
26. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in aesthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod 1991; 61:43–48.
27. Lamontagne P. The evolution of dental esthetics. J Dentaire Quebec 1990; 8:27.