Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1714, 2011, Pages 2032-2039

  Little, Anthony C ^a   de Bruine, Lisa M ^b   Jones, Benedict C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Attractiveness; Disease; Pathogens; Sexual dimorphism; Variation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ASYMMETRY; DISEASE PREVALENCE; GENETIC MARKER; MASCULINIZATION; MATE CHOICE; MORTALITY RISK; PATHOGEN; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; VISUAL CUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; FACE; FEMALE; FEMININITY; HUMAN; MALE; MASCULINITY; MIDDLE AGED; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES; CUES; FACE; FEMALE; FEMININITY; HUMANS; MALE; MASCULINITY; MIDDLE AGED; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957634914     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1925     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999 Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 452-460. (doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(99)01403-5)
2. Jasienska, G., Lipson, S. F., Ellison, P. T., Thune, I. & Ziomkiewicz, A. 2006 Symmetrical women have higher potential fertility. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 390-400. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.001)
3. Møller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998 Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151, 174-192. (doi:10.1086/286110)
4. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 2006 Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 131-144. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001)
5. Weeden, J. & Sabini, J. 2005 Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: a review. Psychol. Bull. 131, 635-653. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635)
6. Grammer, K. & Thornhill, R. 1994 Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 233-242. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233)
7. Mealey, L., Bridgestock, R. & Townsend, G. 1999 Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 76, 151-158. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76. 1.151)
8. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2001 Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1617-1623. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1703)
9. Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1999 Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues to good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1913-1917. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.1999.0866)
10. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. 2001 Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 39-44. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1327)
11. Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A. & Edwards, R. 1999 Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 295-307. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00014-8)
12. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. & Sumich, A. 1998 Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 5, 659-669
13. Little, A. C. & Jones, B. C. 2003 Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270, 1759-1763. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2445)
14. Folstad, I. & Karter, A. J. 1992 Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am. Nat. 139, 603-622. (doi:10.1086/285346)
15. Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A. & Simmons, L. W. 2003 Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, S93-S95. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0023)
16. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P. & Pike, C. L. 1990 What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 59, 61-72. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61)
17. DeBruine, L. M. et al. 2006 Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1355-1360. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3445)
18. Berry, D. S. & McArthur, L. Z. 1985 Some components and consequences of a babyface. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48, 312-323. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.312)
19. Little, A. C. & Hancock, P. J. 2002 The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. Br. J. Psychol. 93, 451-464. (doi:10.1348/000712602761381349)
20. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. 1998 Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884-887. (doi:10. 1038/29772)
21. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2002 Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1095-1100. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2002.1984)
22. Thornhill, R. & Grammer, K. 1999 The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality? Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 105-120. (doi:10.1016/S1090- 5138(98)00044-0)
23. Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F. & Thune, I. 2004 Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1213-1217. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.2004.2712)
24. Enlow, D. M. 1982 Handbook of facial growth, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
25. Law-Smith, M. J. et al. 2006 Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 135-140. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3296)
26. Cunningham, M. R. 1986 Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 50, 925-935. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925)
27. Jones, D. & Hill, K. 1993 Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum. Nat. 4, 271-296. (doi:10. 1007/BF02692202)
28. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Smith, F. G., Feinberg, D. R., Little, A. C. & Al-Dujaili, E. A. S. 2008 Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women's faces when their testosterone levels are high. Horm. Behav. 54, 703-708. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh. 2008.07.012)
29. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Waitt, C., Tiddeman, B. P., Feinberg, D. R., Perrett, D. I., Apicella, C. L. & Marlowe, F. W. 2008 Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS ONE 3, e2106. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002106)
30. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Feinberg, D. R. 2008 Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. Behav. Ecol. 19, 902-908. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arn049)
31. Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P. & Perrett, D. I. 2003 Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). J. Comp. Psychol. 117, 264-271. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264)
32. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D.M., Murray, L. K. & Minamisawa, R. 1999 Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399, 741-742. (doi:10.1038/21557)
33. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2007 Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biol. Psychol. 76, 209-216. (doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003)
34. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R. & Smith, M. J. L. 2008 Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Arch. Sexual Behav. 37, 78-84. (doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y)
35. Little, A. C., Cohen, D. L., Jones, B. C. & Belsky, J. 2007 Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 967-973. (doi:10.1007/s00265-006- 0325-7)
36. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Conway, C. A., Welling, L. L. M. & Smith, F. 2007 Sensation seeking and men's face preferences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 439-446. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav. 2007.07.006)
37. Fraccaro, P. J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Watkins, C. D. & Jones, B. C. 2010 Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices. Evol. Psychol. 8, 447-461.
38. Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L. & Marlowe, F. W. 2007 Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 3113-3117. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0895)
39. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. 2001 Male facial attractiveness: evidence for a hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 251-267. (\doi:10.1016/S1090-5138 (01)00066-6)
40. Burley, N. 1986 Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. Am. Nat. 127, 415-445. (doi:10.1086/284493)
41. Moller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. 1998 Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 55, 1507-1515. (doi:10.1006/ anbe.1998.0731)
42. Booth, A. & Dabbs, J. 1993 Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces 72, 463-477.
43. Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. 1996 Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
44. Wilson, M. & Daly, M. 1997 Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods. Br. Med. J. 314, 1271-1274.
45. Ellison, P. T. (ed.) 2001 Reproductive ecology and human evolution. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
46. Campbell, K. L. & Wood, J. W. (eds). 1994 Human reproductive ecology: interactions of environment, fertility, and behaviour. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
47. Mace, R. 2000 Evolutionary ecology of human life history. Anim. Behav. 59, 1-10. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999. 1287)
48. Geary, D. C., Vigil, J. & Byrd-Craven, J. 2004 Evolution of human mate choice. J. Sex Res. 41, 27-42. (doi:10. 1080/00224490409552211)
49. Chisholm, J. S. 1996 The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization. Hum. Nat.-Interdiscip. Biosoc. Perspect. 7, 1-37.
50. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. 1991 Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary-theory of socialization. Child Dev. 62, 647-670. (doi:10.2307/1131166)
51. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A. & Trivers, R. 2004 Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 355-370. (doi:10. 1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.002)
52. Gangestad, S. W. & Buss, D. M. 1993 Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethol. Sociobiol. 14, 89-96. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7)
53. Low, B. S. 1990 Marriage systems and pathogen stress in human societies. Am. Zool. 30, 325-339.
54. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M. & Little, A. C. 2010 The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2405-2410. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2009.2184)
55. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D. & Griskevicius, V. 2010 Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 69-74. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.003)
56. Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P. & Penton-Voak, I. S. 2010 National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 810-812. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0964)
57. Jones, B. C. et al. 2005 Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 347-354. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.2004.2962)
58. Benson, P. J. & Perrett, D. I. 1993 Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception 22, 257-262. (doi:10.1068/p220257)
59. Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2001 Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Comp. Graph. Appl. 21, 42-50. (doi:10.1109/38.946630)
60. Curtis, V., Aunger, R. & Rabie, T. 2004 Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S131-S133. (doi:10.1098/ rsbl.2003.0144)
61. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. 2006 Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychol. Inquiry 17, 75-95. (doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1702_1)