Evolution of human mate choice

Journal of Sex Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-42

  Geary, David C ^a   Vigil, Jacob ^a   Byrd Craven, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; HUMAN; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; WELLBEING; ANIMAL; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENDER IDENTITY; MALE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUALITY;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SEXUAL PARTNERS;

EID: 4444315114     PISSN: 00224499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224490409552211     Document Type: Review

References (174)

1. Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., et al. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15-24.
2. Alexander, R. D. (1979). Darwinism and human affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
3. Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
4. Amundsen, T. (2000). Why are female birds ornamented? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 149-155.
5. Andersen, A.-M. N., Wohlfahrt, J., Christens, P., Olsen, J., & Melbye, M. (2000). Maternal age and fetal loss: Population based register linkage study. British Medical Journal, 320, 1708-1712.
6. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of social class. New York: Routledge.
8. Banfield, S., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 119-142.
9. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395-424.
10. Beck, S. P., Ward-Hull, C. I., & McClear, P. M. (1976). Variables related to women's somatic preferences of the male and female body. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1200-1210.
11. Beckerman, S., Lizarralde, R., Ballew, C., Schroeder, S., Fingelton, C., Garrison, A., et al. (1998). The Barí partible paternity project: Preliminary results. Current Anthropology, 39, 164-167.
12. Bellis, M. A., & Baker, R. R. (1990). Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humans. Animal Behaviour, 40, 997-999.
13. Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 17-35.
14. Betzig, L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproductiou: A Darwinian view of history. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
15. Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654-676.
16. Betzig, L. (1992). Roman polygyny. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 309-349.
17. Betzig, L. (1995). Medieval monogamy. Journal of Family History, 20, 181-216.
18. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1996). Monogamy and sperm competition in birds. In J. M. Black (Ed.), Partnerships in birds: The study of monogamy (pp. 323-343). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Bonnerup, J. A., Gramkow, A., Sorensen, P., Melbye, M., Adami, H.-O., Glimelius, B., et al. (2000). Correlates of heterosexual behavior among 23-87 year olds in Denmark and Sweden, 1992-1998. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 91-106.
20. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 65-82). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1990). Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: Evidence for female choice in mammals? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 255-264.
22. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2000). Optimizing offspring: The quantity-quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 391-410.
23. Brewer, D. D., Potterat, J. J., Garrett, S. B., Muth, S. Q., Roberts, J. M., Kasprzyk, D., et al. (2000). Prostitution and the sex discrepancy in reported number of sexual partners. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 97, 12385-12388.
24. Buckle, L., Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Rodd, Z. A. (1996). Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 363-377.
25. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
26. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
27. Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: The Guilford Press.
28. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251-255.
29. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
30. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346-361.
31. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271-278.
32. Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Cerda-Flores, R. M., Barton, S. A., Marty-Gonzalez, L. F., Rivas, F., & Chakraborty, R. (1999). Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: A validation study with blood group markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 281-293.
34. Chagnon, N. A. (1988, February 26). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985-992.
35. Chagnon, N. A. (1997). Yanomamö (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
36. Clark, R. D., III, & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2, 39-55.
37. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 236, 339-372.
38. Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991, May 2). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58-60.
39. Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935.
41. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality, and Social Psychology, 59, 61-72.
42. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution and behavior (2nd. ed.). Boston: Willard Grant.
43. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
44. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11-27.
45. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
46. Darwin, C., & Wallace, A. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties, and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 3, 45-62.
47. Davidson, J. K., Sr., & Moore, N. B. (Eds.). (2001). Speaking of sexuality: Interdisciplinary readings. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
48. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Diamond, J. (1992). The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal. New York: Harper Perennial.
50. Dickemann, M. (1981). Paternal confidence and dowry competition: A biocultural analysis of purdah. In R. D. Alexander & D. W. Tinkle (Eds.), Natural selection and social behavior (pp. 417-438). New York: Chiron Press.
51. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). The mating system of callitrichid primates: 1. Conditions for the coevolution of pair bonding and twinning. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1057-1070.
52. Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. The Journal of Sex Research, 27, 527-555.
53. Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977, July 15). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215-223.
54. Essock-Vitale, S. M., & McGuire, M. T. (1988). What 70 million years hath wrought: Sexual histories and reproductive success of a random sample of American women. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 221-235). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
56. Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
57. Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 11, 154-158.
58. Flinn, M. V. (1988a). Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 1-28.
59. Flinn, M. V. (1988b). Parent-offspring interactions in a Caribbean village: Daughter guarding. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 189-200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Flinn, M. V., & Low, B. S. (1986). Resource distribution, social competition, and mating patterns in human societies. In D. I. Rubenstein & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Ecological aspects of social evolution: Birds and mammals (pp. 217-243). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
62. Forsberg, A. J. L., & Tullberg, B. S. (1995). The relationship between cumulative number of cohabiting partners and number of children for men and women in modern Sweden. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 221-232.
63. Furlow, F. B., Armijo-Prewitt, T., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 823-829.
64. Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Sexual selection and physical attractiveness. Human Nature, 4, 205-235.
65. Gangestad, S. W., Bennett, K. L., & Thornhill, R. (2001). A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1677-1684.
66. Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.
67. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
68. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69-88.
69. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927-933.
70. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women's sexual interests and their partner's mate retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 975-982.
71. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
72. Gaulin, S. J. C., McBurney, D. H., & Brakeman-Wartell, S. L. (1997). Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: A consequence and measure of paternity uncertainty. Human Nature, 8, 139-151.
73. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
74. Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55-77.
75. Geary, D. C. (2002). Sexual selection and human life history. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 41-101). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
76. Geary, D. C., DeSoto, M. C., Hoard, M. K., Sheldon, M. S., & Cooper, L. (2001). Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Human Nature, 12, 299-320.
77. Geary, D. C., & Flinn, M. V. (2001). Evolution of human parental behavior and the human family. Parenting: Science and Practice, 1, 5-61.
78. Geary, D. C., Rumsey, M., Bow-Thomas, C. C., & Hoard, M. K. (1995). Sexual jealousy as a facultative trait: Evidence from the pattern of sex differences in adults from China and the United States. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 355-383.
79. Gil-Burmann, C., Peláez, F., & Sánchez, S. (2002). Mate choice differences according to sex and age: An analysis of personal advertisements in Spanish newspapers. Human Nature, 13, 493-508.
80. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242.
81. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Shebilske, L. J., & Lundgren, S. R. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 522-531.
82. Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of male attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59-72.
83. Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. (1983). Too many women? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
84. Hames, R. (1992). Variation in paternal care among the Yanomamö. In B. S. Hewlett (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 85-110). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
85. Hames, R. (1996). Costs and benefits of monogamy and polygyny for Yanomamö women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 181-199.
86. Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., & Tanese, R. (1990). Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (A review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 87, 3566-3573.
87. Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982, October 22). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218, 384-387.
88. Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78, 1082-1091.
89. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 728-750.
90. Hewlett, B. S. (1992). Husband-wife reciprocity and the father-infant relationship among Aka pygmies. In B. S. Hewlett (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 153-176). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
91. Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
92. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
93. Hume, D. K., & Montgomerie, R. (2001). Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of "quality" in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 93-112.
94. Irons, W. (1979). Cultural and biological success. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Natural selection and social behavior (pp. 257-272). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
95. Irons, W. (1983). Human female reproductive strategies. In S. Wasser & M. Waterhouse (Eds.), Social behavior of female vertebrates (pp. 169-213). New York: Academic Press.
96. Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Review, 75, 21-64.
97. Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny. Current Anthropology, 36, 723-748.
98. Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271-296.
99. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
100. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
101. Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Gabrielidis, C., & Cornelius, J. S. (1996). Adolescents' age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. Child Development, 67, 1499-1511.
102. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97-116.
103. Lancaster, J. B. (1989). Evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives on single-parenthood. In R. W. Bell & N. J. Bell (Eds.), Interfaces in psychology: Sociobiology and the social sciences (pp. 63-72). Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.
104. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
105. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 39-44.
106. Low, B. S. (2000). Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
107. MacDonald, K. (1992). Warmth as a developmental construct: An evolutionary analysis. Child Development, 63, 753-773.
108. MacDonald, K. (1995). The establishment and maintenance of socially imposed monogamy in Western Europe. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 3-46.
109. Macrae, C. N., Alnwick, K. A., Milne, A. B., & Schloerscheidt, A. M. (2002). Person perception across the menstrual cycle: Hormonal influences on social-cognitive functioning. Psychological Science, 13, 532-536.
110. Manning, J. T., Koukourakis, K., & Brodie, D. A. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and sexual selection in human males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 15-21.
111. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223-236.
112. Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Hunter, D. J., Hankinson, S. E., et al., (1995). Body weight and mortality among women. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 677-685.
113. McBurney, D. H., Simon, J., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Geliebter, A. (2002). Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: Replication in a population presumed to have high paternity certainty. Human Nature, 13, 391-402.
114. McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A., & De Lisi, R. (Eds.). (2002). Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
115. McGraw, K. J. (2002). Environmental predictors of geographic variation in human mate preferences. Ethology, 108, 303-317.
116. Menken, J., Trussell, J., & Larsen, U. (1986, September 26). Age and infertility. Science, 233, 1389-1394.
117. Miller, L. C., Putcha-Bhagavatula, A., & Pedersen, W. C. (2002). Men's and women's mating preferences: Distinct evolutionary mechanisms? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 88-93.
118. Moller, A. P., Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207-219.
119. Murdock, G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
120. Nei, M., & Hughes, A. L. (1991). Polymorphism and evolution of the major histocompatibility complex loci in mammals. In R. K. Selander, A. G., Clark, & T. S. Whittam (Eds.), Evolution at the molecular level (pp. 222-247). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
121. Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473-491.
122. Ober, C., Elias, S., Kostyu, D. D., & Hauck, W. W. (1992). Decreased fecundability in Hutterite couples sharing HLA-DR. American Journal of Human Genetics, 50, 6-14.
123. Ober, C., Weitkamp, L. R., Cox, N., Dytch, H., Kostyu, D., & Elias, S. (1997). HLA and mate choice in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 61, 497-504.
124. Oda, R. (2001). Sexual dimorphic mate preference in Japan: An analysis of lonely hearts advertisements. Human Nature, 12, 191-206.
125. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29-51.
126. Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271-291.
127. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39-48.
128. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999, June 24). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741-742.
129. Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., Schmidt, N., et al. (2002). Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 873-880.
130. Pérusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrialized societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267-322.
131. Phillips, D. I. W., Handelsman, D. J., Eriksson, J. G., Forsén, T., Osmond, C., & Barker, D. J. P. (2001). Prenatal growth and subsequent marital status: Longitudinal study. British Medical Journal, 322, 771.
132. Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143-150.
133. Potthoff, R. F., & Whittinghill, M. (1965). Maximum-likelihood estimation of the proportion of nonpaternity. American Journal of Human Genetics, 17, 480-494.
134. Pratto, F. (1996). Sexual politics: The gender gap in the bedroom, the cupboard, and the cabinet. In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 179-230). New York: Oxford University Press.
135. Pratto, F., & Hegarty, P. (2000). The political psychology of reproductive strategies. Psychological Science, 11, 57-62.
136. Reynolds, J. D., & Székely, T. (1997). The evolution of parental care in shorebirds: Life histories, ecology, and sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 126-134.
137. Roulin, A. (1999). Nonrandom pairing by male barn owls (Tyto alba) with respect to a female plumage trait. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 688-695.
138. Roulin, A., Jungi, T. W., Pfister, H., & Dijkstra, C. (2000). Female barn swallows (Tyto alba) advertise good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 937-941.
139. Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Nicastle, L. D., & Millevoi, A. (2003). Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 17-23.
140. Saino, N., Møller, A. P., & Bolzern, A. M. (1995). Testosterone effects on the immune system and parasite infestations in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): An experimental test of the immunocompetence hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 397-404.
141. Saino, N., Primmer, C. R., Ellegren, H., & Møller, A. P. (1997). An experimental study of paternity and tail ornamentation in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Evolution, 51, 562-570.
142. Sargent, R. C., Rush, V. N., Wisenden, B. D., & Yan, H. Y. (1998). Courtship and mate choice in fishes: Integrating behavioral and sensory ecology. American Zoologist, 38, 82-96.
143. Sasse, G., Muller, H., Chakraborty, R., & Ott, J. (1994). Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Human Heredity, 44, 337-343.
144. Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1913-1917.
145. Scutt, D., & Manning, J. T. (1996). Symmetry and ovulation in women. Human Reproduction, 11, 2477-2480.
146. Segerstrale, U. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The sociobiology debate. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
147. Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456-466.
148. Singh, D. (1993a). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
149. Singh, D. (1993b). Body shape and women's attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature, 4, 297-321.
150. Singh, D. (1995a). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1089-1101.
151. Singh, D. (1995b). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481.
152. Singh, D., & Bronstad, P. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 797-801.
153. Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51-65.
154. Smuts, B. B. (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
155. Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
156. Surbey, M. K., & Conohan, C. D. (2000). Willingness to engage in casual sex: The role of parental qualities and perceived risk of aggression. Human Nature, 11, 367-386.
157. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
158. Szykman, M., Engh, A. L., Van Horn, R. C., Funk, S. M., Scribner, K. T., & Holekamp, K. E. (2001). Association patterns among male and female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) reflect male mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 231-238.
159. Tanner, J. M. (1990). Foetus into man: Physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
160. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
161. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297-302.
162. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior 20, 175-201.
163. Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: Sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 25-51.
164. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
165. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998, May 8). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.
166. Waynforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12, 207-219.
167. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 245-249.
168. Whissell, C. (1996). Mate selection in popular women's fiction. Human Nature, 7, 427-447.
169. White, D. R., & Burton, M. L. (1988). Causes of polygyny: Ecology, economy, kinship, and warfare. American Anthropologist, 90, 871-887.
170. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
171. Wilson, G. D. (1997). Gender differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 27-31.
172. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
173. Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A. H., Te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D. F., Vrieswijk, B., et al. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conceptions rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484-487.
174. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection - A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.