Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 151-158

  Mealey, L ^a,c   Bridgstock, R ^a   Townsend, G C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c St Johns University School of Nursing   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ESTHETICS; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; TWINS;

ADULT; BEAUTY; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 0032604095     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.151     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adobe Photoshop (Version 3.05) [Computer software]. (1994). San Jose, CA: Adobe Systems.
2. Alexander, J., & Stimson, W. H. (1988). Sex hormones and the course of parasitic infection. Parasitology Today, 4, 189-193.
3. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395-424.
4. Bernstein, H., Lin, T., & McClellan, P. (1982). Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 495-503.
5. Borod, J. C. (1993). Cerebral mechanisms underlying facial, prosodic, and lexical emotional expression: A review of neuropsychological studies and methodological issues. Neuropsychology, 7, 445-463.
6. Brown, T., Townsend, G. C., Richards, L. C., Travan, G. R., & Pinkerton, S. K. (1991). Facial symmetry and mirror imaging in South Australian twins. In T. Brown & S. Molnar (Eds.), Craniofacial variation in Pacific populations (pp. 79-98). Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: University of Adelaide.
7. Buss, D. (1984). Evolutionary biology and personality psychology: Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. American Psychologist, 39, 1135-1147.
8. Buss, D. (1987). Sex differences in human mate selection criteria: An evolutionary perspective. In C. Crawford, M. Smith, & D. Krebs (Eds.), Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 335-351). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Buss, D. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628.
10. Buss, D. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
11. Buss, D., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
12. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
13. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935.
14. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61-72.
15. Cunningham, M., Roberts, R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. (1995). Their ideas of attractiveness are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261-279.
16. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (2nd ed.). Boston: Willard Grant Press.
17. Ekman, P., Davidson, R. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342-353.
18. Enlow, D. H. (1990). Facial growth (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
19. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
20. Furlow, F. B., Armijo-Prewitt, T., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 264, 823-829.
21. Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.
22. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69-96.
23. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
25. Gedda, L., Brenci, G., Franceschetti, A., Talone, C., & Ziparo, R. (1981). A study of mirror imaging in twins. In L. Gedda, P. Parisi, & W. E. Nance, Twin research 3: Part A. Twin biology and multiple pregnancy (167-168). New York: Alan R. Liss.
26. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233-242.
27. Halverson, C. F., Jr., & Wampler, K. S. (1997). Family influences on personality development. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (241-267). New York: Academic Press.
28. Hamilton, D., & Zuk, M. (1982, October 22). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218, 384-387.
29. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30. Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183-199.
31. Jones, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36, 723-748.
32. Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4, 271-296.
33. Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H., & Johnson, R. M. (1998). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, 9, 8-13.
34. Kowner, R. (1995). Laterality in facial expressions and its effect on attributions of emotion and personality: A reconsideration. Neuropsychologia, 33, 539-559.
35. Kowner, R. (1996). Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 662-675.
36. Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A., & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology, 27, 79-84.
37. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214-220.
38. Livshits, G., & Kobyliansky, E. (1991). Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Human Biology, 63, 441-466.
39. Loehlin, J. C. (1989). Partitioning environmental and genetic contributions to behavioral development. American Psychologist, 44, 1285-1292.
40. Manning, J. T., & Chamberlain, A. T. (1994). Fluctuating asymmetry, sexual selection and canine teeth in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 255, 189-193.
41. Markow, T. A., & Ricker, J. P. (1992). Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of 3 Drosophila species. Heredity, 69, 122-127.
42. Markow, T. A., & Wandler, K. (1986). Fluctuating dermatoglyphic asymmetry and the genetics of liability to schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 19, 323-328.
43. Mazur, A., Halpern, C., & Udry, J. R. (1994). Dominant-looking male teenagers copulate earlier. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 87-94.
44. McGinnis, R. (1958). Campus values in mate selection. Social Forces, 36, 368-373.
45. Mealey, L. (in press). Kinship: The tie that binds (disciplines). In P. Davies & H. Holcomb, III (Eds.), Evolution and minds: Psychological and philosophical perspectives. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
46. Mealey, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces associated with potential threat. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 119-128.
47. Møller, A. P. (1990). Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1185-1187.
48. Møller, A. P. (1992). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357, 238-240.
49. Møller, A. P., & Höglund, J. (1991). Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: Implications for models of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 245, 1-5.
50. Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta-analysis. American Naturalist, 151, 174-192.
51. Ofoto (Version 2.0.2) [Computer software]. (1993). San Rafael, CA: Light Source Computer Images.
52. Palmer, A. R., & Strobeck, C. (1986). Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 391-421.
53. Parsons, P. A. (1990). Fluctuating asymmetry: An epigenetic measure of stress. Biological Reviews, 65, 131-145.
54. Peretz, B., Ever-Hadani, P., Casamassimo, P., Eidelman, E., Shellhart, C., & Hagerman, R. (1988). Crown size asymmetry in males with FRA (X) or Martin-Bell syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 30, 185-190.
55. Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239-242.
56. Phelps, J.A., Davis, J.O., & Schartz, K.M. (1997). Nature, nurture, and twin research strategies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 117-121.
57. Phillips, K., & Matheny, A. P., Jr. (1997). Evidence for genetic influence on both cross-situation and situation-specific components of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 129-138.
58. Polak, M., & Trivers, R. (1994). The science of symmetry in biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 122-124.
59. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 659-669.
60. Rintamaki, P. T., Alatalo, R. V., Hoglund, J., & Lundberg, A. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry and copulation success in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 54, 265-269.
61. Rose, R. J., Reed, T., & Bogle, A. (1987). Asymmetry of a-Ib ridge count and behavioral discordance of monozygotic twins. Behavior Genetics, 17, 125-140.
62. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185-1204.
63. Segal, N. L. (1993). Twin, sibling, and adoption methods: Tests of evolutionary hypotheses. American Psychologist, 48, 943-956.
64. Segal, N. L., & MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Behavior genetics and evolutionary psychology: A unified perspective on personality research. Human Biology, 70, 175-182.
65. Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial symmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456-466.
66. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
67. Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1995). Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: Symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 261, 111-116.
68. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/Sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago: Chicago University.
69. Thornhill, R. (1992). Female preference for the pheromones of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera). Behavioral Ecology, 3, 277-283.
70. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
71. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297-302.
72. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 98-102.
73. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601-1615.
74. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: An evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137-173.
75. Tooby, J. (1982). Pathogens, polymorphism and the evolution of sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 97, 557-576.
76. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Male selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
77. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). New York: Aldine-Atherton.
78. Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16, 125-142.
79. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
80. Watson, P. J., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 21-25.
81. Wedekind, C. (1992). Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 247, 169-174.
82. Zuk, M. (1992). The role of parasites in sexual selection: Current evidence and future directions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 39-67.