Migration of connective tissue-derived cells is mediated by ultra-low concentration gradient fields of EGF

Experimental Cell Research

Volumn 317, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1491-1502

  Kong, Qingjun ^a   Majeska, Robert J ^a   Vazquez, Maribel ^a  

^a City University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemotaxis; Concentration; EGF; Fibroblast; Gradient; Microfabrication

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; FIBRONECTIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMOTAXIS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLANT; KNEE LIGAMENT; MACROPHAGE; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 79956313171     PISSN: 00144827     EISSN: 10902422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Van Haastert P.J., Devreotes P.N. Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5(8):626-634.
2. Van Haastert, P.J., Chemotaxis: insights from the extending pseudopod. J Cell Sci. 123(Pt 18): p. 3031-7.
3. Nakahama, K., Cellular communications in bone homeostasis and repair. Cell Mol Life Sci. 67(23): p. 4001-9.
4. Fuller, D., W. Chen, M. Adler, A. Groisman, H. Levine, W.J. Rappel, and W.F. Loomis, External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(21): p. 9656-9.
5. Goodwin A.M. In vitro assays of angiogenesis for assessment of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents. Microvasc. Res. 2007, 74(2-3):172-183.
6. Ware M.F., Wells A., Lauffenburger D.A. Epidermal growth factor alters fibroblast migration speed and directional persistence reciprocally and in a matrix-dependent manner. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111(Pt 16):2423-2432.
7. Kleinman H.K., Jacob K. Invasion assays. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2001, (Chapter 12). Unit 12 2.
8. Lauffenburger D., Farrell B., Tranquillo R., Kistler A., Zigmond S. Gradient perception by neutrophil leucocytes, continued. J. Cell Sci. 1987, 88(Pt 4):415-416.
9. Xie H., Pallero M.A., Gupta K., Chang P., Ware M.F., Witke W., Kwiatkowski D.J., Lauffenburger D.A., Murphy-Ullrich J.E., Wells A. EGF receptor regulation of cell motility: EGF induces disassembly of focal adhesions independently of the motility-associated PLCgamma signaling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111(Pt 5):615-624.
10. Dalous J., Burghardt E., Muller-Taubenberger A., Bruckert F., Gerisch G., Bretschneider T. Reversal of cell polarity and actin-myosin cytoskeleton reorganization under mechanical and chemical stimulation. Biophys. J. 2008, 94(3):1063-1074.
11. Sattler M., Quackenbush E., Salgia R. Cell motility, adhesion, homing, and migration assays in the studies of tyrosine kinases. Methods Mol. Med. 2003, 85:87-105.
12. Weiger M.C., Wang C.C., Krajcovic M., Melvin A.T., Rhoden J.J., Haugh J.M. Spontaneous phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling dynamics drive spreading and random migration of fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122(Pt 3):313-323.
13. Ono S.J., Nakamura T., Miyazaki D., Ohbayashi M., Dawson M., Toda M. Chemokines: roles in leukocyte development, trafficking, and effector function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111(6):1185-1199. quiz 1200.
14. Wang F. The signaling mechanisms underlying cell polarity and chemotaxis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1(4):a002980.
15. Schneider I.C., Haugh J.M. Mechanisms of gradient sensing and chemotaxis: conserved pathways, diverse regulation. Cell Cycle 2006, 5(11):1130-1134.
16. Biname, F., G. Pawlak, P. Roux, and U. Hibner, What makes cells move: requirements and obstacles for spontaneous cell motility. Mol Biosyst. 6(4): p. 648-61.
17. Eccles S.A., Box C., Court W. Cell migration/invasion assays and their application in cancer drug discovery. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2005, 11:391-421.
18. Schneider I.C., Haugh J.M. Quantitative elucidation of a distinct spatial gradient-sensing mechanism in fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 171(5):883-892.
19. Sheetz M.P., Felsenfeld D., Galbraith C.G., Choquet D. Cell migration as a five-step cycle. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 1999, 65:233-243.
20. Whitesides G.M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 2006, 442(7101):368-373.
21. Lin F., Nguyen C.M., Wang S.J., Saadi W., Gross S.P., Jeon N.L. Effective neutrophil chemotaxis is strongly influenced by mean IL-8 concentration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 319(2):576-581.
22. Tranquillo R.T., Zigmond S.H., Lauffenburger D.A. Measurement of the chemotaxis coefficient for human neutrophils in the under-agarose migration assay. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1988, 11(1):1-15.
23. Paguirigan A.L., Beebe D.J. Microfluidics meet cell biology: bridging the gap by validation and application of microscale techniques for cell biological assays. Bioessays 2008, 30(9):811-821.
24. Folch A. BioMEMS and cellular biology: perspectives and applications. J. Vis. Exp. 2007, 8:300.
25. Kong Q., Vazquez M. Internal fluid flow increases cellular interconnects between medial collateral ligament fibroblasts and cellular extensions within three-dimensional collagen matrixes. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2006, 13(3):139-149.
26. Galbraith C.G., Yamada K.M., Sheetz M.P. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 159(4):695-705.
27. Stalling S.S., Akintoye S.O., Nicoll S.B. Development of photocrosslinked methylcellulose hydrogels for soft tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5(6):1911-1918.
28. Stalling S.S., Nicoll S.B. Fetal ACL fibroblasts exhibit enhanced cellular properties compared with adults. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008, 466(12):3130-3137.
29. Legnani, C., A. Ventura, C. Terzaghi, E. Borgo, and W. Albisetti, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature. Int Orthop. 34(4): p. 465-71.
30. Kong, Q., R.A. Able, Jr., V. Dudu, and M. Vazquez, A microfluidic device to establish concentration gradients using reagent density differences. J Biomech Eng. 132(12): p. 121012.
31. Glasgow J.E., Farrell B.E., Fisher E.S., Lauffenburger D.A., Daniele R.P. The motile response of alveolar macrophages, an experimental study using single-cell and cell population approaches. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1989, 139(2):320-329.
32. Farrell B.E., Daniele R.P., Lauffenburger D.A. Quantitative relationships between single-cell and cell-population model parameters for chemosensory migration responses of alveolar macrophages to C5a. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 1990, 16(4):279-293.
33. Tranquillo R.T., Lauffenburger D.A., Zigmond S.H. A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106(2):303-309.
34. Lauffenburger D.A., Rivero M., Kelly F., Ford R., DiRienzo J. Bacterial chemotaxis. Cell flux model, parameter measurement, population dynamics, and genetic manipulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1987, 506:281-295.
35. Wiley H.S., Shvartsman S.Y., Lauffenburger D.A. Computational modeling of the EGF-receptor system: a paradigm for systems biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13(1):43-50.
36. DeWitt A., Iida T., Lam H.Y., Hill V., Wiley H.S., Lauffenburger D.A. Affinity regulates spatial range of EGF receptor autocrine ligand binding. Dev. Biol. 2002, 250(2):305-316.
37. Kong Q., Vazquez M. Flow-induced shear stresses increase the number of cell-cell contacts within extracellular matrix. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2009, 89(4):968-979.
38. Haller M.F., Saltzman W.M. Localized delivery of proteins in the brain: can transport be customized?. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15(3):377-385.
39. Thorne R.G., Hrabetova S., Nicholson C. Diffusion of epidermal growth factor in rat brain extracellular space measured by integrative optical imaging. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92(6):3471-3481.
40. Thorne R.G., Nicholson C. In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(14):5567-5572.
41. Kojic N., Kojic M., Tschumperlin D.J. Computational modeling of extracellular mechanotransduction. Biophys. J. 2006, 90(11):4261-4270.
42. Haugh J.M., Wells A., Lauffenburger D.A. Mathematical modeling of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling through the phospholipase C pathway: mechanistic insights and predictions for molecular interventions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 70(2):225-238.
43. Lauffenburger D.A., Fallon E.M., Haugh J.M. Scratching the (cell) surface: cytokine engineering for improved ligand/receptor trafficking dynamics. Chem. Biol. 1998, 5(10):R257-R263.