Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses transmitted to implants from metal frameworks

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1735-1739

  de Torres, Érica Miranda ^a   Barbosa, Gustavo Augusto Seabra ^b   Bernardes, Sérgio Rocha ^c   de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello ^d   Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

^c ILAPEO   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental alloys; Dental implants; Fixed implant prosthesis; Marginal misfit; Photoelastic analysis

Indexed keywords

CO-CR ALLOYS; COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUMS; CORRELATION TESTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FIXED IMPLANT PROSTHESIS; MARGINAL MISFIT; MAXIMUM SHEAR STRESS; METAL MODELS; ONE-WAY ANOVA; OPTICAL MICROSCOPES; PHOTO-ELASTIC ANALYSIS; PHOTOELASTIC MODELS; RANK CORRELATION; STANDARD DEVIATION;

ALLOYS; CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COBALT; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; PROSTHETICS; TITANIUM; TITANIUM CASTINGS;

TITANIUM ALLOYS;

ALLOY; CHROMIUM; COBALT; METAL; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; BONE STRESS; ELASTICITY; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRESS; STANDARDIZATION; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TORQUE; VERTICAL MISFIT;

ALLOYS; BIOMECHANICS; CHROMIUM; COBALT; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; METALS; MICROSCOPY; NICKEL; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 79956125378     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.032     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abreu R.T., Spazzin A.O., Noritomi P.Y., Consani R.L.X., Mesquita M.F. Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution. Journal of Prosthodontics 2010, 19:425-431.
2. Aparício C. A new method to routinely achieve passive fit of ceramometal prostheses over Brånemark osseointegrated implants: a two-year report. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 1994, 14:405-419.
3. Bevilacqua M., Tealdo T., Menini M., Pera F., Mossolov A., Drago C., Pera P. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implantsupported fixed dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2011, 105:5-13.
4. Bernardes S.R., Araújo C.A., Fernandes Neto A.J., Simamoto Júnior P., Neves F.D. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2009, 24:781-789.
5. Brånemark P.I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1983, 50:399-410.
6. Brodsky J.E., Caputo A.A., Furstman L.L. Root typping: a photoelastic-histopathologic correlation. American Journal of Orthodontics 1975, 67:1-10.
7. Carr A.B., Gerard D.A., Larsen P.E. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1996, 76:500-509.
8. Cheshire P.D., Hobkirk J.A. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1996, 23:782-789.
9. Dally J.W., Riley W.F. Experimental Stress Analysis 1978, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Tokyo, New York, (pp. 571). 2nd ed.
10. Goodacre C.J., Bernal G., Rungcharassaeng K., Kan J.Y.K. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003, 90:121-132.
11. Goossens I.C., Herbst D. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures. Journal of the South African Dental Association 2003, 58:279-287.
12. Gratton D.G., Aquilino S.A., Stanford C.M. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2001, 85:47-52.
13. Greco G.D., Jansen W.C., Landre Júnior J., Seraidarian P.I. Biomechanical analysis of the stresses generated by different disocclusion patterns in an implant-supported mandibular complete denture. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2009, 17:515-520.
14. Hecker D.M., Eckert S.E. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003, 89:346-351.
15. Jansen V.K., Conrads G., Richter E.J. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1997, 12:527-540.
16. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1996, 11:151-158.
17. Jemt T., Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1996, 11:620-625.
18. Kan J.Y.K., Rungcharassaeng K., Bohsali K., Goodacre C.J., Lang B.R. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1999, 81:7-13.
19. Karl M., Winter W., Taylor T.D., Heckmann S.M. Fixation of 5-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures and resulting bone loading: a finite element assessment based on in vivo strain measurements. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2006, 21:756-762.
20. Karl M., Winter W., Dickinson A.J., Wichmann M.G., Heckmann S.M. Different bone loading patterns due to fixation of three-unit and five-unit implant prostheses. Australian Dental Journal 2007, 52:47-54.
21. Markarian R.M., Ueda C., Sendyk C.L., Laganá D.C, Souza R.M. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics 2007, 16:117-122.
22. Millington N.D., Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1995, 8:511-516.
23. Ogawa T., Dhaliwal S., Naert I., Mine A., Kronstrom M., Sasaki K., Duyck J. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010, 37:525-531.
24. O'Mahony A., Macneill S.R., Cobb C.M. Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants. Quintessence International 2000, 31:249-256.
25. Renner A.M. Fabrication of implant overdentures that are passive and biocompatible. Implant Dentistry 2000, 9:96-101.
26. Riedy S.J., Lang B.R., Lang B.E. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997, 78:596-604.
27. Romero G.G., Engelmeier R., Powers J.M., Canterbury A.A. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000, 84:602-607.
28. Sadowsky S.J., Caputo A.A. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2000, 84:327-334.
29. Sagat G., Yalcin S., Gultekin B.A., Mijiritsky E. Influence of arch shape and implant position on stress distribution around implants supporting fixed full-arch prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Implant Dentistry 2010, 19:498-508.
30. Sahin S., Cehreli M.C. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dentistry 2001, 10:85-92.
31. Taylor T.D., Agar J.R. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002, 88:89-95.
32. Torres E.M., Rodrigues R.C.S., Mattos M.G.C., Ribeiro R.F The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks. Journal of Dentistry 2007, 35:800-805.
33. Uludamar A., Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures Part II: efficacy of the Preci-disc system for the correction of errors. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1996, 9:16-20.
34. Waskewicz G.A., Ostrowski J.S., Parks V.J. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1994, 9:405-411.
35. Watanabe F., Uno I., Hata Y., Neuendorff G., Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2000, 15:209-218.
36. Weinberg L.A. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1993, 8:19-31.
37. Winter W., Möhrle S., Holst S., Karl M. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2010, 25:947-952.