Pattern-related visual stress, chromaticity, and accommodation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6843-6849

  Allen, Peter M ^a,b   Hussain, Atif ^b   Usherwood, Claire ^b   Wilkins, Arnold J ^c  

^a Vision and Eye Research Unit   (United Kingdom)

^b ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COLORIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECCENTRIC MUSCLE CONTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT REFRACTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STRESS;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLOR VISION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; VISION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955947388     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-5086     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690-694.
2. Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18:13-20.
3. Allen PM, O'Leary DJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. 2006;46:491-505.
4. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held RA. Dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 1995;35:1299-1304.
5. Schmid KL, Hilmer KS, Lawrence RA, Loh, S-Y, Morrish, L Brown B. The effect of common reductions in letter size and contrast on accommodation responses in young adult myopes and emmetropes. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:602-611.
6. Johnson CA. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J Opt Soc Am. 1976; 66: 138-142.
7. Charman WN, Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res. 1977;17:129-139.
8. Morgan MW. Accommodation and its relationship to convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1944;21:183-195.
9. Atchison DA, Charman WN, Woods RL. Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:511-520.
10. Birnbaum, MH. Optometric Management of Nearpoint Vision Disorders. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.
11. Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Wilkins AJ. The influence of tinted lenses upon ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 2001;41:1229-1238.
12. Chase C, Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH. Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86:883-889.
13. Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH, Chase C. Accommodation response and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29: 625-633.
14. Evans BJW, Wilkins AJ, Brown J, et al. A preliminary investigation into the aetiology of Meares-Irlen syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:286-296.
15. Evans BJW, Patel R, Wilkins AJ, et al. A review of the management of 323 consecutive patients seen in a specific learning difficulties clinic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:454-466.
16. Robinson GL, Foreman PJ. Scotopic sensitivity/Irlen syndrome and the use of coloured filters: a long-term placebo controlled and masked study of reading achievement and perception of ability. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;89:83-113.
17. Wilkins AJ, Evans BJW, Brown J, et al. Double-masked placebocontrolled trial of precision spectral filters in children who use coloured overlays. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:365-370.
18. Singleton C, Henderson LM. Computerised screening for visual stress in reading. J Res Reading. 2007;30:316-331.
19. Allen PM, Gilchrist JM, Hollis J. Use of visual search in the assessment of pattern-related visual stress (PRVS) and its alleviation by coloured filters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 4210-4218.
20. Ciuffreda KJ, Scheiman M, Ong E, Rosenfield M, Solan HA. Irlen lenses do not improve accommodative accuracy at near. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:298-302.
21. Wilkins AJ, Nimmo-Smith MI, Tait A, et al. A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain. 1984;107:989-1017.
22. Wilkins AJ, Nimmo-Smith MI. The clarity and comfort of printed text. Ergonomics. 1987;30:1705-1720.
23. Hollis J, Allen PM Screening for Meares-Irlen sensitivity in adults: can assessment methods predict changes in reading speed? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006; 26: 566-571.
24. Conlon E, Lovegrove W, Chekaluk E, Pattison P. Measuring visual discomfort. Vis Cognit. 1999; 6: 637-663.
25. Davies LN, Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:320-324.
26. Allen PM, Radhakrishnan H, O'Leary DJ. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:245-251.
27. Wilkins AJ, Jeanes RJ, Pumfrey PD, Laskier M. Rate of Reading Test: its reliability, and its validity in the assessment of the effects of coloured overlays. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:491-497.
28. Choi M, Weiss S, Schaeffel F, et al. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (Power- Refractor). Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77: 537-548.
29. Seidemann A, Schaeffel F. An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction. Vision Res. 2003; 43: 419-430.
30. Krumholz M, Fox RS, Ciuffreda KJ. Short-term changes in tonic accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:552-557.
31. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Filmartin B. Continuous measurement of accommodation in human factor applications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:380-384.
32. Anderson HA, Glasser A, Manny RE, Steubing KK. Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:614-622.
33. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ. Effect of surround propinquity on the open-loop accommodative response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991; 32: 142-147.
34. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ, Rosenfield M. Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:31-41.
35. Owens DA. A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings, Vision Res. 1980;20: 159-167.
36. Tucker J, Charman WN. Effect of target content at higher spatial frequencies on the accuracy of the accommodation response. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7:137-142.
37. Niwa K, Tokoro T. Influence of spatial distribution with blur on fluctuations in accommodation. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:227-232.
38. Ciuffreda, KJ. Accommodation, the pupil, and presbyopia. In: Benjamin, WJ, Borish, IM, eds. Borish's Clinical Refraction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006:93-144.
39. Chase C, Dougherty RF, Ray N, Fowler S, Stein J. L/M speed matching ratio predicts reading in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84:229-236.
40. Rucker FJ, Kruger PB. Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. 2006; 46:3079-3089.
41. Day M, Strang NC, Seidel D, Gray LS, Mallen EAH. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26:88-96.
42. Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis. 2005;5:466-477.
43. Allen PM, Radhakrishnan H, Rae SR, et al. Aberration control and vision training as an effective means of improving accommodation in myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5120-5129.
44. He JC, Burns SA, Marcos S. Monochromatic aberrations in the accommodated human. Vision Res. 2000;40:41-48.
45. Ninomita S, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, et al. Changes of ocular aberration with accommodation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:924-926.
46. Cheng H, Barnett JK, Vilupuru AS, et al. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004;4: 272-280.
47. Atchison DA, Collins MJ, Wildsoet CF, Christensen J, Waterworth MD. Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique. Vision Res. 1995;35:313-323.
48. Howland HC, Buettner J. Computing high order wave aberration coefficients from variations of best focus for small artificial pupils. Vision Res. 1989;29:979-983.
49. Lu C, Campbell, MCWA, Munger R. Monochromatic aberrations in accommodated eyes. Ophthalmic Vis Opt Tech Digest. 1994;3: 160-163.
50. Stark LR, Atchison DA. Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:528-537.
51. Seidel D, Gray LS, Heron G. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82: 279-285.
52. Wilkins AJ, Sihra N, Nimmo-Smith I. How precise do precision tints have to be and how many are necessary? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005; 25: 269-276.