Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 614-622

  Anderson, Heather A ^a   Glasser, Adrian ^a   Manny, Ruth E ^a   Stuebing, Karla K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMMETROPIA; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS; LATENT PERIOD; MYOPIA; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SCHOOL CHILD; SPECTACLES; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75749120699     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3653     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Howland HC. Optics of photoretinoscopy: results from ray tracing. Am J Optom Physiol Optics. 1985;62(9):621-625.
2. Schaeffel F, Farkas L, Howland HC. Infrared photoretinoscope. Appl Opt. 1987;26(8):1505-1509.
3. Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol. 1993;461:301-320.
4. Campbell FW, Robson JG. High-speed infrared optometer. J Opt Soc Am. 1959;49(3):268-272.
5. Campbell FW, Westheimer G. Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. J Physiol. 1960;151:285-295.
6. Kotulak JC, Schor CM. Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions. Opt Soc Am A. 1986;3(2):223-227.
7. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter. Vision Res. 1993;33(15):2083-2090.
8. Heron G, Schor C. The fluctuations of accommodation and ageing. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1995;15(5):445-449.
9. Beers APA, Van der Heijde GL. Age-related changes in the accommodation mechanism. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73(4):235-242.
10. Stark LR, Atchison DA. Pupil size, mean accommodation response and the fluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17(4):316-323.
11. Sun F, Stark L, Nguyen A, Wong J, Lakshminarayanan V, Mueller E. Changes in accommodation with age: static and dynamic. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65(6):492-498.
12. Heron G, Charman WN, Gray LS. Accommodation responses and ageing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2872-2883.
13. Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vis Res. 2003;43:2945-2956.
14. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Acceleration characteristics of human ocular accommodation. Vis Res. 2005;45:17-28.
15. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Vis Res. 2006;46:1507-1519.
16. Tondel GM, Candy TR. Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(2):949-956.
17. Tondel GM, Candy TR. Accommodation and vergence latencies in human infants. Vis Res. 2008;48:564-576.
18. Candy TR, Bharadwaj SR. The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants. J Vision. 2007;7(11):1-16.
19. Heron G, Charman WN, Schor C. Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Vis Res. 2001;41(4):507-519.
20. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53(11):740-745.
21. Hyvarinen L, Nasanen R, Laurinen P. New visual acuity test for pre-school children. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1980;58(4):507-511.
22. Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Refractive Error. In: Zadnik K, ed. The Ocular Examination Measurements and Findings. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997:51-86.
23. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):1111-1119.
24. Phillips S, Shirachi D, Stark L. Analysis of accommodative response times using histogram information. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1972;49(5):389-401.
25. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3463-3472.
26. Schor CM, Lott LA, Pope D, Graham AD. Saccades reduce latency and increase velocity of ocular accommodation. Vision Res. 1999;39:3769-3795.
27. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Effect of target luminance on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 1993;13:258-265.
28. Shirachi D, Liu J, Lee M, Jang J, Wong J, Stark L. Accommodation dynamics I. Range nonlinearity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(9):631-641.
29. Beers APA, Van der Heijde GL. In vivo determination of the biomechanical properties of the component elements of the accommodation mechanism. Vision Res. 1994;34(21):2897-2905.
30. Buehren T, Collins MJ. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality. Vision Res. 2006;46:1633-1645.
31. Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Legras R, Montes-Mico R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(4):1736-1743.
32. Mordi JA, Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Res. 2004;44(6):591-601.
33. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vision Res. 1999;39:1991-2015.
34. Heys KR, Cram SL, Truscott RJW. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? Mol Vis. 2004;10:956-963.
35. Ciuffreda KJ, Kruger PB. Dynamics of human voluntary accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988;65(5):365-370.
36. Van Alphen GWHM, Graebel WP. Elasticity of tissues involved in accommodation. Vision Res. 1991;31(7/8):1417-1438.