Trilobite body patterning and the evolution of arthropod tagmosis

BioEssays

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 386-395

  Hughes, Nigel C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOX PROTEIN;

ARTHROPOD; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY GROWTH; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GROWTH RATE; HEAD; MORPHOGENESIS; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; REVIEW; SKELETON; TRUNK;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; EVOLUTION; FOSSILS; GENES, HOMEOBOX;

ARTHROPODA; TRILOBITOMORPHA;

EID: 0037388931     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.10270     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression patterns of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. Development 2002;129: 1225-1238.
2. Budd GE. A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 2002;417:271-275
3. Conway Morris S. Crucible of Creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
4. Hughes NC. Trilobite tagmosis and body patterning from morphological and developmental perspectives. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2003;43, in press.
5. Burmeister H. The Organization of Trilobites. London: The Ray Society; 1846.
6. Minelli A, Fusco G, Hughes NC. Tagmata and segment specification in trilobites. Special Papers in Palaeontology 2003;70, in press.
7. Stubblefield CJ. Notes on the development of a trilobite, Shumardia pusilla (Sars). Zool J Linnean Soc 1926;35:345-372.
8. Whittington HB. Exoskeleton, moult stage, appendage morphology, and habits of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Olenoides serratus. Palaeontology 1980;23:171-204.
9. Briggs DEG, Fortey RA. The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science 1989;246:241-243.
10. Edgecombe GE, Ramsköld L. Relationships of Cambrian Arachnata and the systematic position of Trilobita. J Paleont 1999;73:263-287.
11. Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 2001;413:157-161.
12. Sundberg FA. Homeotic evolution in Cambrian trilobites. Paleobiology 2000;26:258-270.
13. Beeman RW, Stuart JJ, Brown SJ, Denell RE. Structure and function of the homeotic gene complex (Hom-C) in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. BioEssays 1993;15:439-444.
14. Cisne JL. Evolution of the world fauna of aquatic free-living arthropods. Evolution 1974;28:337-366
15. Wills MA, Briggs DEG, Fortey RA. Evolutionary correlates of arthropod tagmosis: scrambled legs. In: Fortey RA, Thomas RH, editors. Arthropod Relationships, Systematics Association Special volume 55. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997; p 57-65.
16. Hughes NC, Chapman RE. Growth and variation in the Silurian proetide trilobite Aulacopleura konincki and its implications for trilobite palaeobiology. Lethaia 1995;28:333-353.
17. Fortey RA, Owens RM. Feeding habits in trilobites. Palaeontology 1999;42:429-465.
18. Hughes NC. Ecologic evolution of Cambrian trilobites. In: Zhuravlev AY, Riding R, editors. The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000; p 370-403.
19. Budd GE. Ecology of nontrilobite arthropods and Iobopods in the Cambrian. In: Zhuravlev AY, Riding R, editors. The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000; p 404-427.
20. Akam M, Averof M, Castelli-Gair J, Dawes R, Falciani F, Ferrier D. The evolving role of Hox genes in arthropods. Development 1994; Supplement to volume 124:209-215.
21. Wills MA, Briggs DEG, Fortey RA. Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology 1994;20: 93-130.
22. Raymond PE. The appendages, anatomy, and relationships of trilobites. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences 1920;7:1-169.
23. McNamara KJ. Progenesis in trilobites. Special Papers in Palaeontology 1983;30:59-68.
24. Hughes NC, Chapman RE, Adrain JM. The stability of thoracic segmentation in trilobites: a case study in developmental and ecological constraints. Evol Dev 1999;1:24-35.
25. Hughes NC. Morphological plasticity and genetic flexibility in a Cambrian trilobite. Geology 1991;19:913-916.
26. Erwin DH. Macroevolution is more than repeated rounds of microevolution: Evol Dev 1999;2:78-84.
27. Clarkson ENK, Henry J-L. Structures coaptatives et enroulement chez quelques Trilobites ordoviciens et siluriens. Lethaia 1973;6: 105-132.
28. Vermeij GJ. Evolution and Escalation: Princeton, Princeton University Press; 1987.
29. Akam M. Arthropods: developmental diversity within a (super) phylum. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:4438-4441.
30. Chatterton BDE. Taxonomy and ontogeny of Siluro-Devonian trilobites from near Yass, New South Wales. Palaeontographica Abt. A 1971;137: 1-108.
31. Owen AW. Trilobite abnormalities. T Roy Soc Edin-Earth 1985;76:255-272.
32. Hughes NC, Chapman RE. Morphometry and phylogeny in the resolution of paleobiological problems - unlocking the evolutionary significance of an assemblage of Silurian trilobites. In: Adrain JM, Edgecombe GD, Lieberman BS, editors. Fossils, Phylogeny and Form: An Analytical Approach. Boston/Dordrect/London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001; p 29-54.
33. McShea DW. A metric for the study of evolutionary trends in the complexity of serial structures. Biol J Linnean Soc 1992; 45:39-55.
34. Abzhanov A, Kaufman TC. Novel regulation of the homeotic gene Scr associated with a crustacean leg-to-maxilliped appendage transition: Development 1999;126:1121-1128.
35. Budd GE. Does evolution in body patterning genes drive morphological change or vice versa? BioEssays 1999;21:326-332.
36. Raw F. The ontogenies of trilobites and their significance Part 1. Am J Sci 1927;14:7-35.
37. Cisne JL. Life history of an Ordovician trilobite, Triarthrus eatoni: Ecology 1973;54:135-142.