An investigation into the receptivity of undergraduate students to assessment empowerment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 547-557

  Francis, Robert A ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955556117     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701698991     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Browne, B.A., D.O. Kaldenberg, W.G. Browne, and D.J. Brown. 1998. Student as customer: factors affecting satisfaction and assessments of institutional quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 8, no. 3: 1-14.
2. Boud, D. 1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
3. Dancer, D., and P. Kamvounias. 2005. Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 4: 445-54.
4. Healey, M., and J. Roberts. 2004. Engaging students in active learning: case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines. Gloucestershire: Geography Discipline Network.
5. Hodgson, V. 1997. Lectures and the experience of relevance. In The experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education, eds. F. Marton, D. Hounsell, andN. Entwistle, 159-71. 3rd (Internet) ed. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
6. Hunt, J. 2004. Using a self-assessment marking checklist. In Engaging students in active learning: case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines, eds. M. Healey and J. Roberts, 107-15. Gloucestershire: Geography Discipline Network.
7. Leach, L., G. Neutze, and N. Zepke. 1998. Motivation in assessment. In Motivating students, eds. S. Brown, C. Thompson, and S. Armstrong, 201-09. London: Kogan Page.
8. Leach, L., G. Neutze, and N. Zepke. 2001. Assessment and empowerment: some critical questions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 4: 293-305.
9. Maguire, S., S.E. Evans, and L. Dyas. 2001. Approaches to learning: a study of first-year geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 25, no. 1: 95-107.
10. Ramsden, P. 1992. Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
11. Roberts, J. 2004. Getting to grips with assessment criteria. In Engaging students in active learning: case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines, eds. M. Healey and J. Roberts, 122-3. Gloucestershire: Geography Discipline Network.
12. Robinson, N. 2004. Peer group review in design teaching. In Engaging students in active learning: case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines, eds. M. Healey and J. Roberts, 45-7. Gloucestershire: Geography Discipline Network.
13. Rowland, S. 2003. Teaching for democracy in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 8, no. 11: 89-101.
14. Rust, C. 2002. The impact of assessment on student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 3, no. 2: 145-58.
15. Rust, C, M. Price, and B. O'Donovan. 2003. Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 2: 147-64.
16. Taras, M. 2001. The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 6: 605-14.