After the P3: Late executive processes in stimulus categorization

Psychophysiology

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 825-841

  Folstein, Jonathan R ^a   Van Petten, Cyma ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Classification; ERPs; Event related potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955515960     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01146.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3-19.
2. Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 191-206.
3. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
4. Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Parvaz, M. A., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology, 43, 253-260.
5. Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Watson, T. D., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biological Psychology, 71, 278-288.
6. Breton, F., Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G. Jr. (1988). The N2 component elicited by stimulus matches and multiple targets. Biological Psychology, 27, 23-44.
7. Christensen, C. A., Ivkovich, D., & Drake, K. J. (2001). Late positive ERP peaks observed in stimulus-response compatibility tasks tested under speed-accuracy instructions. Psychophysiology, 38, 404-416.
8. Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136-1149.
9. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-533.
10. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
11. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41, 665-678.
12. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938-940.
13. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
14. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1994). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 148-160.
15. Ferrari, V., Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., & Lang, P. J. (2010). Detecting novelty and significance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 404-411.
16. Folstein, J. R. (2007). On the category's edge: Event-related potential correlates of novelty and conflicting information in rule-based categorization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
17. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2004). Multidimensional rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: Event-related potential correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1026-1044.
18. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N200: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170.
19. Folstein, J. R., Van Petten, C., & Rose, S. A. (2008). Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli: N2 and P3 correlates. Psychophysiology, 45, 467-479.
20. Fox, A. M., Michie, P. T., Wynne, C. D., & Maybery, M. T. (2000). ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1045-1053.
21. García-Larrea, L., & Cézanne-Bert, G. (1998). P3, positive slow wave and working memory load: A study on the functional correlates of slow wave activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 260-273.
22. Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 198-216.
23. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 331-344.
24. Grossman, M., Smith, E. E., Koenig, P., Glosser, G., DeVita, C., Moore, P., & McMillan, C. (2002). The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory. NeuroImage, 17, 1549-1561.
25. Hahn, U., Prat-Sala, M., Pothos, E. M., & Brumby, D. P. (2010). Exemplar similarity and rule application. Cognition, 114, 1-18.
26. Holyoak, K. J., & Kroger, J. K. (1995). Forms of reasoning: Insight into prefrontal functions? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 253-263.
27. Ilan, A. B., & Polich, J. (1999). P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 367-373.
28. Iguchi, Y., & Hashimoto, I. (2000). Sequential information processing during a mental arithmetic is reflected in the time course of event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 204-213.
29. Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482-553.
30. Johnson, R. Jr. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.) Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 69-138). Connecticut: JAI Press.
31. Johnson, R. Jr., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology, 17, 167-178.
32. Johnson, R. Jr., & Donchin, E. (1985). Second thoughts: Multiple P300s elicited by a single stimulus. Psychophysiology, 22, 182-194.
33. Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 51-63.
34. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
35. Knowlton, B. J., Squire, L. R., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory, 1, 106-120.
36. Koenig, P., Smith, E. E., Glosser, G., DeVita, C., Moore, P., McMillan, C., et al. (2005). The neural basis for novel semantic categorization. NeuroImage, 24, 369-383.
37. Kroger, J. K., Sabb, F. W., Fales, C. L., Bookheimer, S. Y., Cohen, M. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: A parametric study of relational complexity. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 477-485.
38. Kuo, T. Y., & Van Petten, C. (2006). Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1133-1146.
39. Kuo, T. Y., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Perceptual difficulty in source memory encoding and retrieval: Prefrontal versus parietal electrical brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2243-2257.
40. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
41. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211, 77-80.
42. Mecklinger, A., & Pfeifer, E. (1996). Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 211-224.
43. Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477-494.
44. Münte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 71-73.
45. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.
46. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1998). A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 345-369.
47. Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. 1992. On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
48. Patalano, A. L., Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. A. (2001). PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 360-370.
49. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
50. Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (1998a). Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. Learning & Memory, 5, 420-428.
51. Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (1998b). Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 747-750.
52. Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92-114.
53. Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1997). Different cortical activation patterns in blind and sighted humans during encoding and transformation of haptic images. Psychophysiology, 34, 292-307.
54. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R. Jr., Canoune, H., & Ritter, W. (1991). Event-related potentials during arithmetic and mental rotation. [Erratum appears in Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 1992, 85, 396-8]. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 79, 473-487.
55. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Grafman, J., Canoune, H., & Ritter, W. (1992). Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 53-66.
56. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R. Jr., Grafman, J., Canoune, H., & Ritter, W. (1997). Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 35, 195-209.
57. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R. Jr., Mahaffey, D., & Sutton, S. (1988). Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. Psychophysiology, 25, 339-353.
58. Schendan, H. E., & Maher, S. M. (2009). Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms. NeuroImage, 44, 1423-1438.
59. Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (1998). Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1005-1025.
60. Senkowski, D., & Herrmann, C. S. (2002). Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1742-1753.
61. Smid, H. G. O. M., Jakob, A., & Heinze, H.-J. (1999). An event related potential study of visual selective attention to conjunctions of color and shape. Psychophysiology, 36, 264-279.
62. Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., & Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition, 65, 167-196.
63. Smulders, F. T. Y., Kenemans, J. L., Schmidt, W. F., & Kok, A. (1999). Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: Reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated. Psychophysiology, 36, 118-125.
64. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electrophysiology and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
65. Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., & Ritter, W. (1997). Item and source memory: Differential age effects revealed by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 8, 3373-3378.
66. Van Petten, C., Luka, B. J., Rubin, S. R., & Ryan, J. P. (2002). Frontal brain activity predicts individual performance in an associative memory exclusion test. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1180-1192.
67. Van Petten, C., Senkfor, A. J., & Newberg, W. M. (2000). Memory for drawings in locations: Spatial source memory and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 37, 551-564.
68. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
69. Verleger, R., Jaœkowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 165-181.
70. Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., Mulder, L. J. M., & Scheffers, M. K. (1989). Attention to color: An analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 26, 89-109.
71. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.