Detecting novelty and significance

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 404-411

  Ferrari, Vera ^a   Bradley, Margaret M ^a   Codispoti, Maurizio ^b   Lang, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 75749135665     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21244     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.
2. Breton, F., Ritter, W., Simson, R., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1988). The N2 component elicited by stimulus matches and multiple targets. Biological Psychology, 27, 23-44.
3. Chong, H., Riis, J. L., McGinnis, S. M., Williams, D. M., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2008). To ignore or explore: Top-down modulation of novelty processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 120-134.
4. Codispoti, M., Ferrari, V., & Bradley, M. M. (2006). Repetitive picture processing: Autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Research, 1068, 213-220.
5. Codispoti, M., Ferrari, V., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). Repetition and event-related potentials: Distinguishing early and late processes in affective picture perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 577-586.
6. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1998). P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 41-48.
7. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30.
8. Courchesne, E., Courchesne, R. Y., & Hillyard, S. A. (1978). The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 16, 189-199.
9. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
10. Czigler, I., Csibra, G., & Ambró, A. (1996). Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 43, 27-40.
11. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F., Calvo, V., Faust, R., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology, 37, 737-747.
12. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F., Cohen, L. G., Kennedy, B. P., West, W. C., et al. (1998). Regulation of attention to novel stimuli by frontal lobes: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 9, 787-791.
13. Daffner, K. R., Scinto, L. F., Calvo, V., Faust, R., Mesulam, M. M., West, W. C., et al. (2000). The influence of stimulus deviance on electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to novel events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 393-406.
14. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513.
15. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 406-425.
16. Donchin, E., Kubovy, M., Kutas, M., Johnson, R., & Herning, R. I. (1973). Graded changes in evoked response (P300) amplitude as a function of cognitive activity. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 319-324.
17. Donchin, E., Ritter, W., & McCallum, C. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, & S. H. Koslow (Eds.), Brain event-related potentials in man (pp. 349-411). New York: Academic Press.
18. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467.
19. Ferrari, V., Codispoti, M., Cardinale, R., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1753-1761.
20. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170.
21. Folstein, J. R., Van Petten, C., & Rose, S. A. (2008). Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli. Psychophysiology, 45, 467-479.
22. Gratton, G., Bosco, C. M., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1990). Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 419-432.
23. Jacoby, L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 300-324.
24. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.
25. Junghöfer, M., Elbert, T., Tucker, D., & Rockstroh, B. (2000). Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology, 37, 523-532.
26. Junghöfer, M., & Peyk, P. (2004). Analyzing electrical activity and magnetic fields in the brain. MATLAB News & Notes, 2/04, 14-15.
27. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1998). Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33.
28. Knight, R. T. (1984). Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 9-20.
29. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
30. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective rating of measures and instruction manual (Tech. Rep. No. A-6). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
31. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Näätänen, R., & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1983). The orienting reflex and the N2 deflection of the event related potential (ERP). In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in event related potential research: Endogenous components (10th ed.). Amsterdam: North Holland.
33. Nittono, H., Shibuya, Y., & Hori, T. (2007). Anterior N2 predicts subsequent viewing time and interest rating for novel drawings. Psychophysiology, 44, 687-696.
34. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Jr., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
35. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
36. Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain and Topography, 15, 141-152.
37. Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506-540.
38. Pritchard, W. S., Shappell, S. A., & Brandt, M. E. (1991). Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. In P. K. Ackles & M. G. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (pp. 43-106). London: Jessical Kingsley Publishers.
39. Roth, W. T. (1983). A comparison of P300 and skin conductance response. In A. W. K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in event related potential research: Endogenous components (10th ed.). Amsterdam: North Holland.
40. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2006). Stimulus context determines whether nontarget stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2532-2539.
41. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2007). Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information. Psychophysiology, 44, 374-382.
42. Snyder, E., & Hillyard, S. A. (1976). Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. Behavioral Biology, 16, 319-331.
43. Squires, K. S., Petuchowski, C., Wickens, C., & Donchin, E. (1977). The effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials: A comparison of visual and auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 31-40.
44. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
45. Squires, N. K., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
46. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
47. Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1967). Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science, 155, 1436-1439.
48. Wang, Y., Cui, L., Wang, H., Tian, S., & Zhang, X. (2004). The sequential processing of visual feature conjunction mismatches in the human brain. Psychophysiology, 41, 21-29.