Mathematics for gifted students in an arts- and technology-rich setting

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 397-433

  Gadanidis, George ^a   Hughes, Janette ^b   Cordy, Michelle ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

^c Thames Valley District School Board   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955507331     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235321103400303     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adhami, M. (2007). Cognitive and social perspectives on surprise. Mathematics Teaching, 200, 34-36.
2. Barbeau, E. J., & Taylor, P.J. (2005). ICMI study 16: Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom: Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 125-139. (Pubitemid 41545557)
3. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. New York, NY: Pearson.
4. Borba, M. C. (2007). Humans with media: A performance collective in the classroom? In G. Gadanidis & C. Hoogland (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fields Institute Digital Mathematical Performance Symposium (pp. 15-21). Toronto, ON: Fields Institute.
5. Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. New York, NY: Springer.
6. Cornett, C. (2007). Creating meaning through literature and the arts. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7. Cummins, J., Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing times. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
8. Damico, J. S. (2005). Evoking hearts and heads: Exploring issues of social justice through poetry. Language Arts, 83, 137-146.
9. Davis, A., Millward, P., & Pettitt, D. (1994). Using story and drama to develop mathematics. In A. Davis & D. Pettitt (Eds.), Developing understanding in primary mathematics: Key stages 1 and 2 (pp. 20-46). London, UK: Falmer Press.
10. Deasy, R. (Ed.). (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
11. Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7-31. (Pubitemid 33385980)
12. Feldhusen, J. F., & Kroll, M. D. (1991). Boredom or challenge for the academically talented in school. Gifted Education International, 7, 80-81.
13. Gadanidis, G. (2004). The pleasure of attention and insight. Mathematics Teaching, 186, 10-13.
14. Gadanidis, G. (2007). Designing an online learning platform from scratch. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, Vancouver, BC (pp. 1642-1647). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
15. Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 44-51.
16. Gadanidis, G., Gadanidis, J., & Huang, A. (2005). Using humor to gain mathematical insight. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10, 244-250.
17. Gadanidis, G., & Namukasa, I. (2007). Mathematics-for-teachers (and students). JournalofTeaching and Learning, 5, 13-22.
18. Galbraith J. (1985). The eight great gripes of gifted kids: Responding to special needs. Roeper Review, 8, 15-18.
19. Gallagher, J., Harradine, C., & Coleman, M. (1997). Challenge or boredom? Gifted students' view of schooling. Roeper Review, 19, 132-137.
20. Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Springer, P. (2000). Gifted and nongifted middle school students: Are their attitudes toward school different as measured by the new affective instrument, "My Class Activities"? Journalfor the Education of the Gifted, 24, 74-95.
21. George, N.J. (2000). Beneficial use of dramatics in the classroom. Childhood Education, 75(1), 2-6.
22. Ginsburg, H. P. (1996). Tobys math. In R.J. Sternberg & T. BenZeev(Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 175-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Henderson, D. W. (2001). Experiencing geometry in Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic spaces. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Henderson, D. W., & Taimina, D. (2006). Experiencing meanings in geometry. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (Eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: Modern approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 58-83). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
25. Higginson, W. (2006). Mathematics, aesthetics and being human. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (Eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: Modern approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 126-142). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
26. Hoogland, C. (2009). Cognitive, affective and kinesthetic meaning making through the arts. In J. Sobocan & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking: Teaching and testing in an era of educational accountability (pp. 151-175). London, ON: Althouse Press.
27. House, P. (Ed.). (1987). Providing opportunities for the mathematically gifted K-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28. Howley, A., Pendarvis, E., & Gholson, M. (2005). How talented students in a rural school district experience school mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 123-160.
29. Hughes, J. (2009). Poets, poetry and new media. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
30. Hughes, J. (2008a). The performative pull of research with new media. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(3), 16-34.
31. Hughes, J. (2008b). The "screen-size" art: Using digital media to perform poetry. English in Education, 42, 148-164.
32. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Johnsen, S. K. (2004). Definitions, models, and characteristics of gifted students. In S. K. Johnsen (Ed.), Identifying gifted students: A practical guide (pp. 1-22). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
34. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice-Hall.
35. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.
36. Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
37. Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 236-282.
38. Michaels, J. R. (1999). Risking intensity: Reading and writing poetry with high school students. Urbana, IL: NCTE Press.
39. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
40. Peacock, M. (1999). How to read a poem... and start a poetry circle. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.
41. Poincare, H. (1913). The foundations of science. New York, NY: The Science Press.
42. Prensky, M. (2001). Digitalnatives, digital immigrants. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing.
43. Prescott, J. O. (1999). The power of reader s theatre. Instructor, 112(5), 22-27.
44. Rose, D. S., Parks, M., Androes, K., & McMahon, S. D. (2000). Imagery-based learning: Improving students' reading comprehension with drama techniques. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 55-64.
45. Sheffield, L. J. (2003). Extending the challenge in mathematics: Developing mathematical promise in K-8 students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46. Sinclair, N. (2001). The aesthetic is relevant. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 25-32.
47. Sinclair, N., Pimm, D., & Higginson, W. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics and the aesthetic: Modern approaches to an ancient affinity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
48. Stanley, J. C. (1991). An academic model for educating the mathematically talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 36-42.
49. Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. (1989). Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
50. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. New York, NY: Pearson.
51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2007). Surprise and inspiration. Mathematics Teaching, 200, 4-6.
53. Wechsler, D. (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
54. Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms (Research Monograph No. 93103). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
55. Whitcombe, A. (1988). Mathematics: Creativity, imagination, beauty. Mathematics in School, 17, 13-15.
56. Zwicky, J. (2000). Wisdom and metaphor. Kentville, NS: Gaspereau Press.